Tuesday 10/6/2014
In my view it is vitally important if not
essential to understand the Major
Part if not the most Important Critical
Part played by Richard Trow Hartlepool Council Planning
Officer enthusiastically assisted
by Mr. Reece, the Development
Control Manager who together
Deliberately Conspired to Pervert the
Course of Justice when they jointly
Decided to “Grant” a Highly
Controversial Retrospective
Planning Application H/2009/0568 for a friend, knowing the application was Legally Flawed.
I Seriously Question
the personal integrity of Richard Trow and his involvement in this Highly Controversial
Retrospective Planning Application, when one considers that he himself admitted to me at our first
meeting held in Brian Hanson House in August/September 2008 * that he was the Architect/Draughtsman personally engaged by
the Retrospective Planning Applicants NOT only to Design the Detailed Drawing for the New Kitchen
Extension but to assist and Personally advise the Planning applicants on HOW Best to obtain Planning approval from Hartlepool Planning
Authority,
It is Important to note that Richard Trow, was employed by Hartlepool Borough Council as a Planning
Officer & would have been or should
have been fully Conversant & knowledgeable on HOW,
Retrospective Planning approval could
be Quietly and Discretely
achieved for the Disputed Retrospective Planning application H/2009/0568
he knew it Contained False Claims
of Property “Ownership” & was
therefore Legally Flawed.- WITHOUT - It should be noted , the involvement of any of the
Democratically Elected Councillors on the Hartlepool Planning Committee, No Consultation, No Seeking
Guidance or Legal Advice
for such a Disputed Controversial Retrospective Planning
Application
Hindsight is a wonderful thing- there can be little doubt now, WHY Richard Trow’s was so Confident and Certain at the
Meeting held in Brian Hanson House August/September 2008 * that the Initial Planning application H/2008/0467
later change to that legally flawed
Controversial Retrospective Planning application H/2009 0568 would be approved & eventually granted planning
permission by Hartlepool Planning
authority,
He Himself Richard
Trow Hartlepool Councils Planning
Officer on assuming personally responsible for this Project H/2009 0568 assisted by Mr Reece
Control Planning Manager would
use HIS Delegated Power of Authority in the total absence of the Hartlepool Planning Committee
to decide the final outcome of this Highly Controversial
Retrospective Planning Application.
A Very
Unhealthy Situation for a Council Officials to be placed in, there is
always the Suspicion even the Possibility which has
happen before- that Council
Officials Particularly Planning Officers
when dealing with a Strongly Disputed
Controversial Retrospective
Planning application as H/2009/0568 could be offered and have accepted some
kind of inducement it need not be money,
to adopt a dishonest course of action
by Granting Planning approval for
a Strongly Disputed Retrospective
Planning Application, although
fully Conscious that this Particular
Retrospective Planning application Contained
False Claims of Property “Ownership” & was
therefore Legally
Flawed.
Imagine
the following Scenario, a School
Boy Placed in a very Similar Position, alone in his classroom WITHOUT any
School Teachers present being allowed to Alter or Mark his OWN Examination
Papers, would it be a Complete and Utter Surprise to find the School Boy had passed his
examination with flying colour, even Top Marks .
It is Important to keep in mind, that Richard Trow the
Planning Officer for this Project had been informed on Numerous Occasions has
had Hilary Martin, F,O.I. Officer, Alyson Carman, Solicitor
& Complaints Reviewer, (who had requested & been given
an Official Copy of the Register of Title
in December 2008
) and Paul Burgon, Enforcement
Officer, that the Retrospective Planning applicants
H/2009/0568 – had NOT repeat had NOT Purchased from Hartlepool Borough Council in 1972, any of
the Disputed Property, and therefore DID NOT repeat DID NOT OWN any
of the Freehold Land & Property their Illegally built Kitchen
Extension had been Built on,
Rt. Hon Lord
Denning , Lord Chief Justice His
Appeal Court Ruling January 12.13.24.1956 was –No Court in this Land will allow a person to keep an
advantage he has Obtained by FRAUD ,
NO Judgement of a Court, NO order of a
Minister can be allowed to stand if it has been Obtained by FRAUD –FRAUD unravels
everything.
It is also important to Remember that both Richard Trow Planning
Officer and Mr Reece, Development Control Manager, were Both Well Paid Senior
Council Planning Officials employed in Positions of
Trust in Public Office, although neither were Legally Qualified. it was NOT in my view,
Unreasonable for members of the General Public to have expected BOTH these Highly
Paid Senior Council Officials employed
by Hartlepool Borough Council in the
Planning Department to have at Least a
Basic Working Knowledge if NOT Fully Conversant with
the Town & Country Planning Act 1990, & Both Should
have known that Ownership Certificates A.B.C & D. are a Statutory
Requirement under Sections 65(5) of the Town
& Country Planning Act 1990
I was also
Informed In answer to a Freedom Information request I made to the Office of the
Secretary of State for Communities and local Government, the Right Honourable ERIC PICKLES M.P.
It is a Criminal Offence under Section 65(6) of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 to
issue a Certificate Knowing it Contains False or Misleading information.
The Right Honourable
Eric Pickles MP |
The local
Planning authority, in this case, Richard Trow, the
Hartlepool Council Planning Officer, assisted by Mr. Reece, Development
Control Manager, KNEW or Should
Have KNOWN they “Must Not Entertain”
an application for Planning Permission Unless the Relevant Certificates Concerning
the Ownership” of the Applicants Site have been Completed Stating the “Ownership”
of the Property
Copies to be sent to the under mentioned although ALL have been previously made aware of the Corrupt Situation
festering in Hartlepool
Iain Wright Member of Parliament for Hartlepool.
The Right Honourable Eric Pickles M.P.
De-Brus Ward Labour Councillors, BOB COOK. SYLVIA
TEMPEST.SHEILA GRIFFIN.
NONE of the above named
Labour Councillors have sought fit to acknowledge
or even attempted to contact me to explain .WHY
my Serious Criminal Allegations have
been Ignored, Instead they collectively instructed PETER DEVLIN
believed to be the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool to write to me to me to
say in essence ,that if I have any other Critical Comments to make, I should submit them to him first
& NOT
to my elected ward Labour Councillors,
This
is Freedom of Speech Hartlepool NEW LABOUR Style,
an obvious attempt to TRY and INTIMIDATE or FRIGHTEN this OLD FART,
they know I am an OCTOGENARIAN & Hope I will Just Fade Away,
They ALL Know a
Simple visit to my Home as was undertaken by ROB
COOK ( a Genuine Incompetent would be Politision Compulsive Liar ) prior to his election as the De-Brus Ward Councillor, would quickly establish and Prove my
Allegation Correct.
There can be no room for Misunderstanding or Further Doubts when
one considers the Previous favourable & Extra Special treatment given to
this Particular Retrospective Planning Applicant H/2009/0568
(a)
Being allowed to Operate a Business enterprise from
a Council House , Strictly Prohibited in Council Tenancy agreements
(b)
Allowed to Purchase their Council House Property
in 1972, at a Time of a Critical National
Shortage of Social Housing- a Privilege denied to others.
(c)
Allowed to Continue Operating a Business Enterprise in their newly Purchased Ex-Council House , although
expressly Prohibited in the Registered Land Title Covenants
Shocking - Unbelievable
- BUT TRUE - Once you get over your initial shock, you
will no longer doubt MY Allegations that All
the Undermentioned Council Officials , Richard Trow, Planning
Officer, Hilary Martin, F,O.I. Officer Alyson Carman, Solicitor
& Complaints Reviewer, (who had requested & been given
an Official Copy of the Register of Title
in December 2008
and Paul
Burgon, Enforcement Officer, Conspired -Collaborated with the
Retrospective Planning Applicants H/2009/0568 to Pervert
the Course of Justice, & to Falsely Claim
by Criminal Deception “Ownership” of
Registered Land & Property NOT in their Registered Title !
Please Note, If anything I have Written or Published is NOT TRUE – Why have NONE repeat NONE of the named Hartlepool Council Individuals Disputed
any of my allegations, NOR Commenced ANY Legal Proceeding against ME for Slander, or whatever other crimes they can
think of, BUT remember a Council Cannot Sue for Libel (
Derbyshire vs Sunday Times , House of Lords. 1993 ) NOR can it Indemnify a Councillor or Council Officer
who wishes to Sue an Individual (Local authorities indemnity
for Members and Officers ) order 2004 ?
Yours Sincerely
Alan Harvey Flounders
Received an acknowledgement from the Office of Eric Pickles M.P.
ReplyDeleteSecretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Words of Truth & Wisdom
ReplyDeleteIf you are Right & Know it , Speak your Mind, Even if you are a Minority of ONE ,
THE TRUTH IS STILTHE TRUTH- GANDHI