Remember the Words of the late Lord Chief Justice-Lord Denning-who said-
No Court in this Land-will allow a person to keep an advantage- he has obtained by fraud-
No judgement of a Court-No Order of a Minister-, can be allowed to stand-
if it has been obtained by fraud- FRAUD- unravels everything-
I acknowledge and thank you for your six pages back to back notes type letter I received late on Friday 23/11/2018, sent to my home address and not as I would have preferred to this site, WDTK.
To avoid any future misunderstandings
can I request that Land Registry do not send any future F.O.I. Correspondence to my home address but send it to this site-WDTK to ensure all replies to F.O.I. requests are
Prominently Displayed in the Public Domain for all to See
I find your response very interesting it is undoubtedly well written but unfortunately, after such a long period of time trying to get Land Registry Durham to correct their blatant mistakesI am becoming a little cynical-It is Obvious to me that my Allegationsof Misconduct are been ignored swept under the Carpet your response contains a Catalogue of Plausible but very important factual errors?
I do not doubt for a moment your Personal Honesty or your Integrity, but I believe you have been Deliberately given False Misleading Untruthful Evidence
Simply to Hide the Truth of my allegations of Criminal activity including
Misconduct and Property Fraud in Public Office
Committed by Officials of LAND REGISTRAR Durham
My FOI request asked specific questions in order to ascertain the truth quickly and effectively-briefly
I wished to know what British Laws were consulted that allowed the assistant Land Registrar Durham Alan H Smith
Employed in a Position of Trust and Authority in Public Office of a Government Department Land Registry Durham
from Hartlepool Borough Council on the 1st February 1984 of the Total Area of Land and Property including
the Dwelling House-the Boundaries and Outbuildings Clearly Edged in RED
on the Land Registry Durham “Official Copy” of the Property Plan M44684 Dated September 1983
“Sale of Council House” 48 Ridlington Way
Pursuant to the Housing Act 1980
in Consideration of £5750.00 Pounds
(Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds
Registered Title CE74844 “Absolute”
He must have known as a Senior Government Official with Legal knowledge of the LAW on Purchase and registration contained in
Land Registration Act 1925, Land Registration-Act 2002-Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989-
That he was acting unlawfully and Committing Property Fraud intending to Pervert, the Course of Justice when he reject as Groundless and Irrelevant our Legally authenticated Documents of Purchase
Willingly accept as Sufficient evidence of a Previous Purchase of part of our Registered Land and Property Title CE74844 “Absolute” from our Immediate next-door neighbours
A General Drawing
SP 78985 dated 1971 Showing the Hartlepool Councils
West-View Council House Estate
It is Unbelievable that a Government Official occupying a Position of Trust and authority in Public Office of a Government Department and a qualified Solicitor to boot. would
Considered this MAP of a Council House Estate as Sufficient Evidence for our immediate neighbours
to CHALLENGE the VERACITY of our Legal Purchase of the Ex-Council House 48 Ridlington Way West-View Hartlepool from Hartlepool Borough Council
Pursuant the Housing Act 1980on the 1st February 1984 in Consideration of £5750.00 Pounds
(Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds)
As a Solicitor and a Senior Land Registry Official
he must have Known it was NOT a Receipt of Purchase of Land and Property
by our Immediate next-door Neighbours from Hartlepool Borough Council
in November 1972
His Dishonest Disgraceful Degusting Deceitful Behaviour questions the Legal Competence and Integrity of
ALLthe Solicitors involved in the Sale and Purchase of the Ex-Council House Land and Property from Hartlepool Borough Council
including the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council
J. Anthony Brown
Who with Levinson Walker and Lister the “Buyers” Solicitors had Validated the Purchase of the Ex-Council House Land and Property PRIOR to the Exchange of Contracts and PRIOR to the Registration of the Land and Property
Land Title CE74844 “Absolute”
with Land Registry on the 29/3/1984
This class of title “Absolute” will only be granted by Land Registry-IF-when the title is “FIRST” presented for “Registration” in this case 29th March 1984- the person applying for “Registration” (J. Anthony Brown) Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council- the “Sellers” of the Property-can (show an “Unbroken” chain of “Ownership” going back at least- 15 Years-
this is undoubtedly evidence Confirming that a search had been undertaken-PRIOR the exchange of contracts- in order to allow time to deal with any issues which may arise-
of any part- of our registered freehold property, Land Title CE74844 “Absolute” had previously take place between our immediate neighbours and the Hartlepool Borough Council- in November 1972-
As falsely claimed by the assistant-Land Registrar-Alan H Smith- in his letter to us-dated 3rd December 2008-
its beggar’s belief that someone in a Senior position of trust and authority in Public Office of Land Registry-Durham could allow himself to be party to an obvious fraudulent B141
application-containing a spurious document falsely claiming that they have Title to that piece of land on which they had illegally erected their kitchen and Taxi-Drivers Toilet- extension Without seeking Council Planning Permission- and Causing Serious Structural Damage- to a neighbour’s private property-intending by deception to avoid the Heavy Financial Cost of Demolition of the Illegal Building
There can be no doubt that the assistant Land Registrar Durham Alan H Smith an experienced Land Registry Official and a Solicitor KNEW he had No Credible Evidence to Justify or Validate his Spurious Letter dated 14th October 2008 to me, saying that Hartlepool Borough Council had made a MISTAKE when we had Purchased our Property- Registered Title CE74844 “Absolute” on the 1st February 1984
It was my belief that Alan H Smith the assistant Land REGISTRAR Durham deliberately designed this letter Intending to
Frighten Intimidate Misinform and Deceive
the TWO (2)
Very Elderly Vulnerable and Disabled Law- Abiding Innocent Tax Payers into Thinking and Believing that they might have done something Criminally Wrong when they had Purchased in all good faith the Ex-Council House Property 48 Ridlington Way West-View Hartlepool on the 1st February 1984 from Hartlepool Borough Council Pursuant to the Housing Act 1980 in Consideration of £5750.00 Pounds
(Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds)
Registered Title CE74844! Absolute
His Letter was in my View a Clear Breach of the Malicious Communications Act 1988 and the Fraud Act 2006
It is also my belief that "Misconduct” in Public Office is a Common Law Offence: it is not defined in any statute.
It carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment
The offence requires that: a Public Officer acting as such; wilfully neglects to perform his or her duty and/or wilfully misconducts him or herself; to such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in the office holder; without Reasonable excuse or justification."
It is also my Understanding after reading your letter that you have found it difficult to locate some all my historical records relating to this matter?
A Situation I honestly find unbelievable, as I was under the Impression that Land REGISTRY Durham
was one (1) of the Main Depositaries of Registered Land and Property Titles in the Country.
I did expect Land Registry Durham would have retained
A Copy of the Letter Dated 16th February 1984 issued by Land Registry Durham themselves
was explained to me by my Solicitor “Solomon Levinson” Head of the Local Firm of Solicitors Levinson Walker & Lister
of Church Street Hartlepool
Mr “Solomon Levinson” Explained to me that in Common Law Jurisdictions,
a Freehold is the Common Ownership of Real Property or Land, and all immovable structures attached to such land,
When people buy their house “Freehold" they not only own the HOUSE, they also own ALL outbuilding on the land on which the house is built
. Please Note
the Outbuilding (Wash-House) shown on the Land Registry Durham “Official Copy” of the Property Land Plan No. M44 684 dated September 1983
Registered Title CE74844 “Absolute”
Shows Cleary it was-Completely Detached from our Immediate neighbour's Property 46 Ridlington Way West-View Hartlepool
I believe it is also important to note the date 3.11 1974
Of the two (2) Valid Signatures of the
Mayor J Jones and the Chief Executive Mr Abrahams of Hartlepool Borough Council
Which Clearly Contradicts Alan H Smith and your Statement that Part of the Detached Wash-House Building had been Purchased Previously by our Immediate Next-Door Neighbours from Hartlepool Borough Council
Two (2) years earlier on the 3/11/1972
It is My Understand from my research of the Internet
In English Common Law,
A fee simple absolute is the most extensive interest
in real property that an individual can possess
It is also my Understanding that this type of estate Registered Title CE74844 “Absolute”
was Created when the Deed of Purchase was Registered
by J Anthony Brown
the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council
with Land Registry Durham on the 29.3.1984.
it is limited Completely to the individual and his or her heirs and assigns forever that the Land is Owned Completely, and it is NOT subject to any limitations or Condition
The Official Copy of the Property Plan No-M44684 dated September 1983
Hookway Adam -Correspondence
& enquiries Team Leader-
Customer Service 19th October 2009.
Head Office- Land Registry-Direct Line 020-7166-4831
Who said if the property is Conveyed and Registered an “Official Copy” of the Register of Title is “ALL” that is needed to prove ownership?
There is Sufficient authentic Documentary Evidence to Prove that our Immediate next-door Neighbours did NOT Purchase any part of the Registered property CE74844 “Absolute”
from Hartlepool Borough Council on the 3/11/1972
Therefore, there could NOT Possibly have been any Details of purchase by our immediate neighbours of Land and Property from Hartlepool Borough Council in 1972 conveyed and transferred by a Conveyance Solicitor to Officials of Land Registry Durham
to accurately Record this non-existing Purchase in the Property or Proprietary Registers at Land Registry Durham in November 1972
To Claim ownership of Land and Property without any evidence of Purchase is Deceitful – Dishonest-plain Theft.
My Evidence of Purchase was Confirmed and Validated By Land Registry Durham themselves in their Letter dated 16th February 1984
Rejected by the assistant Land Registrar Durham Alan H Smith and his Colleague Anthony Lowes
Which Proves that there is Something Radically Dishonest Happening at Land Registry Durham.
Rt. Hon Lord Denning the late Lord Chief Justice
His Appeal Court Ruling January 18.104.22.1686
was –No Court in this Land will allow a person
to keep an advantage, he has Obtained by FRAUD NO Judgement of a Court, NO order of a Minister
can be allowed to stand if it has been Obtained by FRAUD –FRAUD unravels everything
My original allegations of Misconduct in Public Office by Officials of Land Registry Durham
Were Investigated by Mrs Dorrington the Land Registry Complaints Reviewer who awarded me a payment of £300.00 pounds and an apology for mistakes made by
officials of Land Registry Durham
I Refused to accept the payment of £300.00. Pounds and returned it to Land Registry London
I explained that for me to have accepted the Payment of £300.00
Remember the Words of the late Lord Chief Justice-Lord Denning-who said- No Court in this Land-will allow a person to keep an advantage- he has obtained by fraud- No judgement of a Court-No Order of a Minister-, can be allowed to stand- if it has been obtained by fraud- FRAUD- unravels everything-
Thursday, 5 July 2018
Request to Land Registry
Dear Sir or Madam,
May I remind you that after an internal investigation into my Allegations of Fraud and Misconduct in Public Office committed by Alan H Smith assistant Land Registrar and other Registry Officials employed at Durham, by the Complaints reviewer Mrs Derrington
I received an apology and was awarded £300.00!
which I refused to accept and returned it to Mr Joe Timothy of Land Registry London, as I believe we have sufficient evidence of Purchase to prove my Allegations of Fraud were NOT fully investigated.
I would be grateful if you would kindly provide me with a copy of that written legal authority which permits Alan H Smith assistant Land Registrar Durham and his Colleague Anthony Lowes to act, advise and represent our immediate next-door neighbours Mr and Mrs E Bennison in their absence at the meeting Held in the Offices of Land Registry Durham in December 2008 andtheir failure to provide the Evidence they claimed to had had of their Purchase from Hartlepool Borough Councilin November1974?
·I would be grateful if you would kindly provide me with a copy of that written legal authority that allows and permits Alan H Smith assistant Land Registrar Durham and his Colleague Anthony Lowes to alter any of the property details conveyed to Land Registry Durham for Registration by the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council J. Anthony Brown on behalf of the “Sellers” of the Land and Property and Levinson Walker and Lister,Solicitors acting on behalf of their Clients!
·I require a Copy of thewritten evidence of a previous purchase to enable me to legally Challenge in a Court of Law the authenticity of the Fraudulent Evidence of a Previous Purchase
·Evidence which I believe was used by our Immediate next-door neighbours Mr and Mrs E Bennison to GAIN by Criminal Deception approval from Richard Trow the Hartlepool Project Planning Official acting WITHOUTthe approval of the ElectedHartlepool Planning authorities, for the illegal Planning application H/208/0467 later changed to Retrospective Planning Application H/209/0568
Government Departments like Land Registry
should be increasingly conscious of their reputation and their legal obligations, for providing safe and secure services to customers. Everyone should be entitled to rely on a Government Guarantee to a registered land title, the claim contained in the Land Registration Act 2002, highlighted in Guidance notes 8, stating a Registered Land Title is “Guaranteed” should be legally enforceable.