Friday, 29 September 2017

Notes on Misconduct in Public Office

·         HI Diana-I to Remain disappointed with Land Registry – their total lack of Positive Responses to my Request for a Review of my Complaints of criminal misconduct by Officials in Public Office , particularly after Ms. Derringtons recommendations that I should be awarded the £300. 00 for mistakes made by Land Registry, Durham Office,(this sum of money I have rejected and returned to Land Registry as unacceptable ) for their disgraceful criminal Conduct and attempts by the assistant Land Registrar of Durham-Alan H Smith-   to Deprive me by Fraud- Malicious criminal  deception & Misconduct in Public Office-   of part of the freehold of Land and Property which we Legally Purchased in all good faith- from Hartlepool Borough Council, on the 1st February 1984 under the right buy law -introduced by Margaret Thatcher as the Housing Act 1980- in consideration of £5,750.00-Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds- Transferred-Recorded and Registered with Land Registry by J Anthony Jones- Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council on the 29.3.1984.

·          Consequently, I was left with no alternative but to report this serious matter of criminal deception & Fraud in Public Office to a higher authority, Cleveland Police- & the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council-Peter Devlin to request a Criminal investigation into my allegations-unfortunately I am still awaiting an acknowledgement of my complaint of Financial Fraud and Misconduct n Public Office  from both Cleveland Police -& the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council-Peter Devlin.

 I have also implemented my Right to complain to the Commissioner under Section 50. Of the Code of Practice, issued by the Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs, who have also failed to answer my concerns- - their silence might be a clear indication to me that they are ALL involved in misconduct in Public Office!

Land Registry have previously stated that Schedule 4 of the Land Registry Act 2002 makes provision for alteration of the Register of Title to correct a mistake, having searched the Office of Public Sector Information and the Land Registry Act 2002 Schedule 4, on the Internet.

This section I believe requires an explanation or a comment from Land Registry. What in these circumstances constitutes a mistake - is it a failure by Land Registry to Record and Register something recorded on some other Title Deeds?

It is also- my Understanding that H.M. Land Registry, pays out Indemnity ONLY where there has been a mistake on the Register and a Registered Proprietor has suffered loss due to the mistake (Schedule 8. Land Registry Act 2002.)

Alan H Smith- the assistant Land Registrar Durham- categorically stated in his letter to me signed & dated 3rd December 2008-that a previous conveyance/Purchase of the property in dispute had been made between the MAYOR =ALDERMEN & BURGESSES of the Borough of HARTLEPOOL in NOVEMBER 1974! Which contradicts ALL the Irrefutable Documentary evidence of Purchase available and therefore can only be a  

A BLATANT LIE- unsupported by ANY credible evidence- to CONFIRM such an OUTRAGEOUS STATEMEN- My previous requests to my Last Local Labour Member of Parliament Iain Wright- to request a “Copy” of this fraudulent purchase document was also kicked into the long Grass?

Friday, 8 September 2017

Blue Badge Criteria!

Blue Badge Criteria!

Of course, it is not until you really need help when you are really disabled and start looking into the qualifying criteria that you realise how complicated and difficult it is to get any of those things that help you make life more bearable- not only do the Government but Local Council seem to deliberately go out of their way to hinder you at every turn-
 After years without any financial government help whatsoever-simply because I had a small private pension- in addition to my state pension- which I had paid into all my working life after leaving Galley’s Field School- at the age of 14! I was continually told by Government Officials in Public Office-I was not entitled to any financial help to replace my bathroom for instance with a walk-in shower Ect! Ect!

I discovered after reading an excellent article published by the “Which” magazine- on “Attendance Allowance” I discovered that if you have serious walking disabilities & other chronic health problems as I have-  and require assistance and over 65 years of age you can apply for attendance  allowance which is NOT Means Tested – I was absolutely delighted -& applied – simply because with my catalogue of medical issues-although well treated and monitored by the Excellent N.H.S. & the Visiting Nurse I feel sure that I'm never going to recover but hope to improve, at last - six months before my 85th Birthday I was awarded Attendance Allowance at the higher rate-How's that for care in the Community   
I Recently received from Hartlepool Borough Council a Letter telling me that my Blue Badge I currently hold will expire on the 5/10/2017.consequently I phoned Hartlepool Council yesterday morning Thursday 07thSeptember 2017- I was told to apply on line to fill in application form-having Attendance allowance does NOT--entitle you to a disability blue badge?

Do this not confirm that both this Government and the Local Council who issue the Disability Blue Badges – try to make things as difficult as possible-?

Tuesday, 1 August 2017

Family History----Melancholy Death from Drowning at Hartlepool.1864

Extracts from the Stockton & Hartlepool Mercury, Wednesday, July 27th. 1864.

Melancholy death from drowning at Hartlepool

On Friday afternoon, July 22nd 1864, a melancholy accident, resulting in the death of a young man named John Farrar, occurred at the works in course of construction near the Hartlepool Slake. It appears that the deceased, who is a carpenter, was engaged in the wood work at the sluices, he was about to step on the scaffolding, when the chain that held it gave way, and the unfortunate man was precipitated into the current, which was running very fast at the time, and has not been seen since. A fellow workman was also immersed, but fortunately seized hold of the hanging timber and was thereby saved from inevitable drowning. The body had not yet been found up to the time of this edition going to press. (Friday Evening, July,22nd.1864 )

From our Second Edition of Saturday. July 23 rd 1864.

Finding of the body--Coroners Inquest , &c.

The body of the young man, drowned under the melancholy circumstances reported in our second edition of Friday evening, was found at a late hour the same evening,( Friday 22nd. ) in the Slake, having been washed through  the sluice gates by the heavy current of flood-tide which sets in through this narrow opening. The place where it was found was about a hundred yards from the spot where the melancholy accident occurred. The deceased was a  highly respectable young man in his own rank of life, and had, with a brother who was also drowned, been for some years the only support of a widowed mother, now some time deceased. He was married to a daughter of Mr.Colling, the deputy Harbour Master of Hartlepool, and leaves a wife and a young family bereaved by his sudden and melancholy death.

An inquest was held on view of the body on the following (Saturday ) evening, before John Settle, Esq and the following jury,

John Lawrenson, Foreman. Chas. Ferrier, Benjamin Roome,?

David Myers, Daniel Ellwood, Robert Brown, Jabez Smith,

Adam McKenzie, Christopher Hoggett-Thos. Hudspith,

Wm. Wilson and Jas. Brown,

The first witness called was :-

Wm. Colling, Deputy-Harbour Master, who stated that the deceased was his son-in-law, aged 28 years, and a ships carpenter to trade.

Wm. Banks, acting foreman of the works, said that the deceased and he were working together, rigging a stage upon the side of the slope at the head of the old harbour. After they had it erected, deceased jumped upon it from off the pile head, and the stage went down in consequence.

The stage was merely a temporary one, and there was no necessity for the deceased to jump upon it. The distance he jumped would be about 3/ feet. Witness said to him -just when he jumped What business had you to jump on the stage before I had it secured? He replied Oh Bill, I am nervous and with that the stage went down, taken with it himself and witness.

Witness escaped by swimming to the chain which crosses the sluice gate, leading to the Slake. Deceased could not swim. The depth of the water would be about 20 feet. There is no life -buoy within 300 or 400 yards of the place.

Wm.Sheffield, mariner, said he found the body of the deceased about half past 10 at night, 100 yards from the place where he was drowned, washed in the Slake

Dorothy Sharp said, I laid out the body and I saw a piece of flesh had been cut out of his right eye, His left ear was cut, and there was a large wound on the back of his neck.

William Nipper, shipwright, said I assisted the deceased to hang the stage,I saw the deceased jump upon it, I was on the opposite side of it, The chain broke and the deceased vanished from view, The chain which broke was merely temporary. The same chain bore the weight of four of us before, besides two deals,about three weeks ago. At the time it broke there were only two men and one deal resting on it. I had confidence in the chain and risked my own life on it. I have examined the chain, and the link I now produce is the only bad one in the chain. If I had been in Banks position on the stage, or in the deceaseds when he jumped, I should have had no fear. The chain 3 weeks ago was double and Banks did not say whether the stage was right or wrong. The stage was only one plank, and quite safe to walk over.

The jury after a short consultation returned a verdict of Accidentally Drowned .


The deceased, who was a member of the St. Hilda Court of Foresters, was interred in Hartlepool Cemetery-Hart-Warren ,(Spion Kop) on Sunday Afternoon, and was followed to his last resting place by 230 of the brethren of the various Courts, and by a large number of his friends and fellow workmen.

John Farrar (many different spellings) was my Great Grandfather, John Farrar had married my Great Grand Mother Ann Colling on Wednesday the 23rd.May 1860 in the Independent Chapel, they had one child, a daughter Jane Isabella Farrar my Grand Mother, On Monday the 6th.August 1866, John Farrars widow Ann remarried in St Hildas Church to John Horsley, a widower and Sea Pilot, they both lived at 2 Chapel Street for the rest of their lives.

On the Birth, Marriage and Death Certificates, their surnames are spelt differently, it is likely that the people spoke their names and the correct spelling was left up to the registrar, priest, or enumerator, you have to bear this fact in mind at all times that the spellings of Surnames was far more flexible in times gone bye-

it should also be remembered that few men and even less females- could read or write-in the 1860’s –I don’t doubt the Honesty or Integrity- of any of the witnesses at the inquest- but the answers given and the manner in which they replied to the Coroners questions-does give the impression that their answers had been a little inspired-or rehearsed- I leave others to make up their own minds on that?

Alan Harvey Flounders-

Monday, 22 May 2017


Setting the Records Straight- Remember ! once it's posted online, it's out there”
In Public life occurs in a wide variety of forms; from the large-scale, complex and sophisticated machinations of a group of influential elected members and/or paid public servants working in concert to systematically siphon off literally millions of pounds of the public purse (as in the John Poulson case), to the lone activities of the single individual exploiting an opportunity to obtain an advantage (pecuniary or otherwise) that may even be felt by that individual to be no more than the privilege that comes with the exalted position of employment like Alan H Smith assistant LAND REGISTRAR in Public Office of a Government Department –Land Registry Durham, or like Peter Devlin Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council- who like
the current hapless useless LABOUR Member of Parliament (but not for much longer) Iain Wright also knew of the Corruption but  as usual did nothing.
Be careful very careful who you vote for next time- you may Heaven Forbid end up with what we have here in Hartlepool a Bunch of Labour Party Scoundrels & Compulsive liars !!!
I think that most reasonable decent Hartlepool people would say we are the Innocent Victims of Hartlepool Council Corruption, we have done nothing wrong but object to an illegally building originally built without Seeking Planning Permission that was attached to our Private Property-causing Severe Damage-!!!
Its worth remembering it was our immediate neighbours who started this fraudulent conspiracy to obtain by criminal deception a Certificate of Lawfulness and Retrospective Planning Permission for a Kitchen and Taxi Drivers Toilet Built WITHOUT first seeking Planning Permission & attaching it to their Immediate neighbor’s Detached Wash House Building causing Severe Structural Damage !!! 
Here is a photograph of our immediate next door neighbours Kitchen and Taxi Drivers Toilet Extension ,attached to our Detached Wash House obviously they have Influential friends in positions of authority on the Hartlepool Planning Committee- their own personal adviser, Architect & Draughtsman the Project the Planning Officer himself Richard Trow- even Peter Devlin the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council has been informed on a number of Previous Occasions as was the Labour Party Councillor for the BRUS WARD 
How’s that for Democracy Hartlepool Labour Party Style !!!
Modern law’s is I believe derived from the old Courts of Common Law and equity which in includes the Law of Property Act 1925 the Settled Land Act 1925 the Land Charges Act 1972 the Land Registration Act 2002- and the European Convention on Human Rights at it core English Land Law involves the acquisition the traditional content of relates to property rights that derive from Common Law equity and the Registration System-Ownership of Land is aquired by a Contract of Sale and to Complete a Purchase the “Buyer” must Formally Register his/her interest with HM Land Registry! Land Registration is NOW Compulsory for ALL land Transactions in England & Wales

The TITLE Plan M44684 “Sale of Council House” dated September 1983 gives a detailed description of the property & also shows very clearly the full extent of the plot within the title being Purchased in all good faith-& transferred from Hartlepool Borough Council on the 1st February 1984 edged in RED & Confirmed by Land Registry Durham in a letter dated 16th February 1984
The Land Registry’s registers of TITLE for a particular piece of Land are considered at LAW to be definitive proof of ANY matter affecting the Land!

Real estate contracts aren’t enforceable unless the parties have exchanged something of value, called Consideration Valuable  Consideration is “MONEY” or something that has Monetary Value.
In this case-our Consideration was £5,750.00 (Five Thousands Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds)
A Letter from Land Registry to me-dated 19th February 2009, said that under English law the same area of freehold land cannot be simultaneously in the ownership of two separate parties, and are PROPERLY in your Title.CE74844 “Absolute”

Proof if further proof of purchase was needed that the two (2) Land Registry Officials in Public Office, Alan H Smith the assistant Land Registrar- & his colleague Anthony Lowes Land Registry Durham acted unlawfully when rejecting our VALID  documents of Purchase of the Ex-Council House Freehold Property Registered Title CE74844”Absolute”
One would have expected - that the assistant Land Registrar- Durham ,Alan H Smith- employed in a Position of Trust & Authority in Public Office- of a Government Department would have known that the class of title “Absolute” will ONLY be granted by Land Registry-IF-when the freehold property- is “FIRST” presented for“ Registration” in this case on the  29th March 1984-the person applying for “Registration” (J.Anthony Brown) Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council- the“Sellers” of the freehold Property-can show an “Unbroken” Chain of “Ownership” going back at least- Fifteen (15 ) Years- to ensure Land Registry own legal oblgation that the “Sellers” of the Ex-Council Freehold Property Hartlepool Council- had  owned the property- for 15 years & had  full legal authority to sell the freehold property to a Council House Tenant!

-Valid Evidence presented to Land Registry Durham by (J.Anthony Brown) Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council Confirming that a Complete Thorough Property Search of ALL Previous Hartlepool Council Property Sales-had been undertaken-by the Chief Engineer and Senior Land Surveyor- B.R. Davies, B.Sc. C. Eng. M.I.C.E. on behalf of Hartlepool Borough Council-the “Sellers” of the EX-Council House Land & Property- in order to allow sufficient time to deal with any issues which may arise-following the Exchange Of Contracts-!!

The Land Registry’s registers of TITLE for a particular piece of Land are considered at LAW to be definitive proof of ANY matter affecting the Land!
The significant issue in this particular case is Did We or Did We Not purchase in all good faith the freehold property Registered Land Title CE74844 “Absolute” including the property details highlighted in RED on the plan M44,684 title “Sale of Council House” pursuant to the Housing Act 1980 in Consideration of £5,750.00 (Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds)
A genuine certificate of authenticity must fully and accurately describe the property being sold or being or purchased   attached-if further irrefutable proof- of this dishonest illegal unsavoury and unhealthy criminal situation were needed is a copy of the letter sent to us- by Alan H Smith the assistant Land Registrar of a Government Department-Land Registry Durham- signed &  dated 3rdDecember 2008- in which he categorically states that our neighbours have better documentary evidence of purchase of the freehold ex council house land and property – than us- if that was the case WHY was it NOT produced for our inspection- ?
What better way to prove your legal purchase of your property than in the words of senior officials of Land Registry "A owner is a person who can show legal title to the Land/Property through Registration of their ownership with Land Registry
Had the unthinkable actually happened was it possible that some form of inducement had been offered and possibly accepted by these two (2) Government Officials in Public Office Alan H Smith & Anthony Lowes to Pervert the Course of Justice & assist the B141 applicants to obtain by Criminal Deception Land & Property NOT in their Legal Entitlement to enable them to falsely obtain a Certificate of Lawfulness & Retrospective Planning Permission for their  Kitchen and Taxi-Drivers Toilet Extension attached to their neighbours Detached Wash House Building.

Yours Sincerely
Alan Harvey Flounders

Friday, 17 March 2017


Dear Ms Alexander Hartlepool Borough Council Chief Executive,

Corruption in Labour Controlled Councils particularly in the North East is nothing new- 
I have sufficient factual credible evidence of legal purchase in all good faith from Hartlepool Borough Council  of my freehold Ex-Council House Land & Property, Registered Title CE74844 “Absolute” available to legally contest & challenge that obvious fabricated false claim- made by Alan H Smith assistant Land Registrar Durham- a government official employed in a public office in his letters to us signed and dated 5th December 2008 that -try and support his misleading spurious  statement without any factual evidence to support his ridiculous claim- that a previous conveyance of the property in dispute had taken place between the Mayor Aldermen and Burgesses of Hartlepool Borough Council and Mr/Mrs E Bennison in November 1974 despite repeatedly asking the chief solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council Peter Devlin to re-examine the fraudulent evidence of property ownership said by Hilary Martin the Freedom of Information Officer to have been examined by Hartlepool Council Planning and Legal Officials prior to granting approval- to the legally flawed Retrospective Planning application H/2009/0568-
I am still awaiting a honest reply from Land Registry Durham, to that ?

Can there be anything more contemptuous than the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Town Council Peter Devlin-and my Labour De Brus Ward Councillor-Bob Cooke- trying to wriggle out of their responsibilities by lying through their teeth.
I am still awaiting a honest reply from Peter Devlin.

How can Both those two (2) named scoundrels in Public and Elected office ( there are others) can only continually to lie as blatantly as this only if they obviously know they are doing so with impunity-courtesy of others in senior positions of authority- but obviously no principles?

There are several question worthy of answers on this matter, as a full Council Tax payer I would appreciate your explanation as to why- my legitimate questions as the Registered freehold property owners –I believe I am legally entitled to make- have been deliberately & continuously brushed under the carpet- who decided that this information should be withheld- it is now obvious that everyone here in Hartlepool can safely assume the "Nolan Principles" went out the window a long time back- particularly in this case
I have always thought-that if any law abiding tax paying member of the general public- has irrefutable factual evidence -as I have- of financial fraud and misconduct in "Public Office" then the place to report it is to Cleveland Police-which I honestly believe I did-some time ago- also kept fully informed and given a copy of all my evidence of legal purchase- was my Labour Party Parliamentary representative in Westminster Iain Wright. (still awaiting for a reply from him on that) including one from the last Monkey elected Mayor of Hartlepool- Mr Drummond ?
What good did he do? Nothing-Heard he’s got a very good little earner now?
Could be he knows where the bodies are buried?

Further information if needed can be found at alan harvey Flounders aka "Coffin Dodger"

Monday, 13 March 2017

POLITE REMINDER To :- Rt Hon:-Elizabeth Truss-M.P.@parliament.u.k.-Lord Chancellor

To :- Rt Hon:-Elizabeth Truss-M.P.@parliament.u.k.-Lord Chancellor & Secretary of State for Justice (a combined position).

Dear Madam- Lord Chancellor- Secretary of State for Justice-

It Is My Understanding Obtained from My Research of the Internet- that the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) is a ministerial department of the UK Government headed by the-Lord Chancellor-and- Secretary of State for Justice (a combined position)

It Is also my-My Understanding that in Accordance to the Land Registration Act 1925, Land Registration-Act 2002-Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act1989- Land Registry’s Only Remit-is to Record All The Information Conveyed To Them By The Solicitors Acting On Behalf Of The Sellers Or Buyers of the Property-Land Registry-Have No Legal Remit-Or Legal Authority Whatsoever-To Alter Any Of The Details Submitted for Registration Of Any-Land /Property Bought Or Sold-By Conveyancing / Solicitors-
“It is therefore vital –in my view-–that the General Public have Confidence in their Public Officials –particularly Land Registry-Durham- and in the legal framework that sets the boundaries of their conduct.

There is urgent need- to ensure that public officials are appropriately held to account for misconduct committed in connection with their official duties-owing to the gravity of my serious allegation- of misconduct in public office-including-conspiracy to pervert the course of justice- by abuse of office-premeditated fraud-as outlined in the Fraud Act 2006-
Having exhausted all the known avenues of Complaint available to me-including the Labour Dominated Hartlepool Borough Council- the Chief Solicitor-of Hartlepool Peter Devlin-who knows of my Concerns of Freehold Property Ownership-and refuses to act- my Labour Party Representative in the Palace of Westminster- Iain Wright-who also knows of my Justifiable concerns- but-refuses to reply to my Letters of Protest
I consider these allegations are a grave-serious matter & should be brought to your- attention-as- the Lord Chancellor-& Secretary of State for Justice-without further delay-

I am reluctantly left with no alternative but to Summit a Formal Complaint to –you- Lord Chancellor & Secretary of State for Justice-to request you-Commence an in-depth Inquiry into my serious allegations of Gross Criminal Misconduct -Abuse of Position in Public Office-including-Property Fraud & attempting to Perverting the course of Justice, in Public Office of the following named-Land Registry-Durham- Government Officials- Alan H Smith-the assistant Land REGISTRAR- Durham-his colleague-Anthony Lowes-& Andrew Schofield-Office Manager-

Who for the past five years -have pursued & supported-(for reasons best known to themselves-) a ludicrous obvious vicious spurious claim made by a B141 applicants-first made- in October 2008- to alter some of the registered & recorded freehold property details –on the Registered Land Title CE74844 “Absolute” freehold ex council house land and property -we purchased in all good faith- pursuant to the Housing Act 1980- on the 1st February 1984-from Hartlepool Borough Council- in Consideration of £5.750.00 Pounds- (Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds) the RECEIPT acknowledged by Hartlepool Borough Council-& -transferred &  registered by the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council- J Anthony Jones- on the 29/3/1984-

Despite the above irrefutable documentary evidence as proof-of purchase-& Ownership- beyond any reasonable doubt-they-refuse-to believe-for reasons best known to themselves- but suspected by others-that the B141 application –made in October 2008-Is a Fraudulent Document-and outside Land Registry’s  Remit-

Is that not a Clear Deliberate Case of Misconduct In Public Office- by Officials- of Land Registry-Durham- to pervert the Course Of Justice-particularly the assistant Land Registrar-Alan H Smith-and his Colleagues-Anthony Lowes- who-it must be remembered-stated-“categorically” in his signed letter dated 5th December 2008- that a conveyance-of the property in question-had previously-taken place-between Mr/Mrs Bennison-and the Mayor-Aldermen and Burgesses of the County Borough of Hartlepool in November 1972-However-the same area of land was-together with other land conveyed to YOU on the 1st February 1984-by Hartlepool Borough Council-as the council had previously Sold Off-the land in November-1972- it could NOT repeat could NOT-subsequently have included it in a Conveyance to you in 1984- this means that -Mr/Mrs Bennison-have the better documentary title to the Land than you-

This statement of fact-made by Alan H Smith- assistant Land Registrar-Durham-that-Mr/Mrs Bennison-have the better documentary title to the Registered Freehold Land CE 74844 “Absolute” than you- without any substantive documentary evidence-whatsoever-is based on fallacious reasons-a deceptive mistaken and false belief- (Held for personal Reasons) that a Conveyance had previously taken place between Mr/Mrs Bennison and the Mayor-Aldermen and Burgees of Hartlepool Borough Council in November 1972-without any substantive- proof whatsoever -it  may also-explain and “Question” -(the reasons best known to Alan H Smith- himself-) his Continual Refusal to accept as Proof-of Purchase & Transfer-the-irrefutable- documentary evidence-presented-for inspection-of the Freehold Property-issued by Land Registry-Durham-themselves-dated 16thFebruary 1984- Confirming”-the Purchased-and Transfer-in all good faith-of the ex-council house freehold land and property-Registered Title CE74844 “Absolute” - pursuant to the Housing Act 1980-in “Consideration” of £5.750. (Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds) and the receipt-acknowledged by Hartlepool Borough Council-of Civic Centre-Hartlepool-Conveys-:-to Alan Harvey Flounders and his wife-Jacqueline Flounders-on the Pre-Sale of Council House-Title Plan-No.M44684-dated September 1983-the entire total area of land edged in RED-–Purchased-from Hartlepool Borough Council-Hartlepool- on 1st February 1984-bound up within and with the dwelling house- known as number 48 Ridlington Way-Hartlepool-

There is- in my view- Sufficient substantive-evidence to show-that-he Alan H Smith-the assistant Land REGISTRAR- employed in public office of a government department- assisted by his colleague-Anthony Lowes- with the assistance-of the- B141 applicants- Mr/Mrs Bennison- and Officials of Hartlepool Borough Council-Planning & Legal Departments-Peter Devlin- Chief Solicitor-of Hartlepool Borough Council- Alyson Carman-Solicitor& amp; Complaints reviewer Hilary Martin-Solicitor and Freedom of Information Officer-Richard Trow- Project Planning Officer—Mr Reece-Planning Development-Manager-Paul Burgon- Enforcement Officer-Collaborated& amp; Conspired to Pervert the Course of Justice- including-Criminal Deception-by abuse of Public Office- intending to deprive the legal owners of part of their registered title-by- Fraud as defined in the FRAUD Act. 2006-

“FRAUD BY FALSE REPRESENTATION” is defined by Section-2-of the Fraud Act-2006- as a case where a person makes “any representation as to fact or law-expressed or implied- which they know to be UNTRUE or MISLEADING-( i.e. Alan H Smith’s -Categorical claim-in his letter to us- signed and dated 5th December 2008- that a Conveyance of the property-had Previously Taken Place between Mr/Mrs Bennison- and the Mayor-Aldermen and Burgesses of the County Borough of Hartlepool-in November 1972)
“FRAUD BY ABUSE OF POSITION” is defined by Section 4-of the Act-as a case where a person occupies a position- i.e. assistant Land Registrar-Durham -a Public Office-where they are expected- to safeguard the financial interests of another person- and abuses that position- this includes cases where the abuse consisted of an omission- rather than an overt act—In all classes of Fraud-it requires that for an offence to have occurred-the person must have acted dishonestly- and that they acted- with the intent of making a gain for themselves-or anyone else- i.e. Mr/Mrs Bennison-or inflicting a loss-or risk of loss-on another-i.e.-us- the Registered Legal owners of the property-Alan Harvey Flounders and his Wife-Jacqueline Flounders
The HM Land Registry Adjudicator was established under the Land Registration Act 2002. The HM Land Registry Adjudicator resolves disputes about registered land by considering references from HM Land Registry following applications made to the HM Land Registry by members of the public- my question is as follows-

How can this be right- when the Officials-complained about-particularly the assistant land REGISTRAR- Alan H Smith- are themselves-employed in Land Registry-Durham- does anyone seriously believe they will report themselves for misconduct in Public Office-
There are many different and varied applications that may be made under the rules but the most common matters referred to the HM Land Registry Adjudicator are disputes about boundaries; easements or restrictive covenants; beneficial ownership of land; and, adverse possession claims.
The varied provisions of the Land Registration Rules 2003 deal with each different application. These Rules must be consulted prior to any application.

The formal procedure before the HM Land Registry Adjudicator is set out within the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry (Practice and Procedure) Rules 2003 as amended by the 2008 Rules.
Any hearing will be as local to the dispute as possible, normally at the tribunal centre closest to hand. A site visit will normally be held before the hearing. The hearings are adversarial and decisions will normally be reserved and handed down in writing within 28 days.
The HM Land Registry Adjudicator has the power to award costs in essentially the same way as under normal civil litigation. Any appeal from any decision of the HM Land Registry Adjudicator is to the Chancery Division of the High Court Permission to appeal is required from either the HM Land Registry Adjudicator or the High Court.!
Judicial Review of a decision to grant, grant subject to conditions, or refuse planning permission is an alternative to the statutory review available under s.288 of the 1990 Act (which can only be pursued if the applicant appeals to the Secretary of State as a preliminary step).
 The procedure is open to any third party of sufficient standing but the first stage of applying for leave to apply for judicial review acts as a filter to prevent unmeritorious applications. The application for leave is made ex parte and allows the applicant to establish whether or not there is an arguable case without incurring excessive liability for costs.

An applicant has to have a ‘sufficient interest” in the matter to which the application relates’.I believe as the Registered Purchasers of the Freehold Land &  Property –CE74844 “Absolute” purchased in all good faith- pursuant to the Housing Act 1980- on the 1st February 1984-from Hartlepool Borough Council- in consideration of £5.750.00 Pounds- (Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds) the RECEIPT acknowledged by Hartlepool Borough Council-& Transferred & Registered by the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council- J. Anthony Brown- on the 29/3/1984- gives us sufficient interest” in the matter.
Yours Sincerely
Alan Harvey Flounders
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government-Rt Hon Greg Clark MP-
Iain Wright-Labour -Member of Parliament for Hartlepool-
Peter Devlin-Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Council-
F.V.Clough-Land Registry-Durham-