I have Corrected a few Typographical errors in the interest of Clarity , the salient points are the same.
in this letter to Iain Wright , M.P. Member of Parliament for Hartlepool
Dear Mr Iain Wright M.P.
I am Disappointed to note that you have failed to reply, to my last letter dated Tuesday 8th November 2011 after receiving an acknowledgement when I wrote to you, using the Internet Site, WriteToThem, Containing my answers to Malcolm Dawson's letter which is available on
I Did Think that You Would Question some of the Suspicious and Downright Misleading and Incorrect answers and even offer your thoughts on my Total Rejection of Malcolm Dawson O.B.E so called Investigation into my Allegations of Criminal Wrongdoing by Officers of Land Registry, Durham. it is clearly a "Whitewash" a "Cover-Up" of Criminal Wrongdoing,
One Particular Statement below, which should cause every Property Owner who, Purchased ,a Council House
from Hartlepool Borough Council some very Serious Concerns, because it clearly brings into Question the
Honesty , Professional Competence and Legal Integrity of the "Sellers" Solicitor J.Anthony Brown, the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council, who Checked and Validated and Legally Conveyed, Registered and Recorded the Purchase on Title Deeds CE 74844, “Absolute” with Land Registry, Durham on 29th March 1984
In addition it also Questions the Honesty ,Professional Competence and the Legal Integrity of the "Buyers"
” Solicitors ,Levinson, Walker and Lister, of Church Street, Hartlepool.
Where all these Qualified Solicitors “Criminally Incompetent” and Unfit for Office, I don’t think so.
Malcolm Dawson further states the following:-
“The 1972 transfer plan for numbers 46 &48 were endorsed to say that they had been prepared by the Local Authority’s Engineer and Surveyor ,( Unnamed) but Land Registry had Retained copies of the Original Transfer Documents in Accordance with Standard Practice at the Time,
He goes on say,
The 1972 Transfer plan had Recently been Converted to a Digital Format as part of a National programme
and the Original had been "Destroyed" "HOWEVER" there is "NO" Reason to Doubt the "Authentic Copy"
This statement is Debatable, my Original Legal Documentary Evidence Contradicts this "Opinion"
? Is it not Strange to "Destroy" the "Original" Transfer Documents "BUT" to Retain the "Copies"
What was the name of the Local Authorities Engineer and Surveyor in 1972 ?
Please note, Malcolm Dawson OBE, Chief Land Registrar and Chief Executive of Land Registry is Very Careful “NOT” to claim the “Authentic Copy” as an “Official Copy” of the Register of Title, “WHY”
And I ask once again “WHY” have I “Never” Received such a “Copy”
but did receive, as previously stated , Two Coloured Photographs of an Outside Toilet & Door "?
It must be Remembered that An “Official Copy” ( which I received in October 2008 shows the Entries in the “Register” of Title CE 74844, on the 9th October 2008, timed at 10.55.27 ) and Issued on 10th October 2008, showing and specifies the Class of Title “Absolute” and Identifies the “Owner “ or Proprietor on “Registration” on the 29th March 1984.
the “Official Copy”Is Admissible in “Evidence” of “Ownership” to the same extent as the “Original”. as under s 67 of the Land Registration Act 2002,
I make “NO” apologies for repeating that I personally very much DOUBT that the above Questionable Statement by Malcolm Dawson’s OBE that the “Original” Survey Documents had been “Destroyed” but there is “NO” Reason to Doubt the “Authenticity” of the “Copy” Would be Accepted as the Definitive Truth by a High Court Judge in a Court of Law, Without
(a) being made under oath and
(b) tested by Counter argument and Cross Examination by the Other Party,
It should also be noted that I personally with One Independent Witness Inspected and Validated all the Details ,in August 2008, on the Original Land Title Deeds DU 37533 “Registered” and Recorded in 1972
There was “NO” Indication or Evidence to Contradicted the Details Recorded at the time of Inspection.
As now claimed by Malcolm Dawson OBE . ?
In addition it most Certainly questions the Honesty, Integrity and Competence and can only Muddy the Professional Reputation of the Senior Engineer and Chief Surveyor of Hartlepool Borough Council, B.R. Davies, B.S.c, who it "MUST" be Remembered was the "Senior Engineer and Chief Surveyor" and therefore
Responsible for “ALL” Surveys and “Property Searches” regarding Council House Sales in 1972. Including Title Deeds DU 37533 .?
Are we to accept that he B.R. Davies, B.S.c. was so un- Professional and “Incompetent” that he had failed to uncover his Own Property Survey Searches which he had Previously Prepared Prior to the Council House sale of Land Title Deeds Du 37533, In 1972, did he also " Completely Forget" those Property Survey Details when “Searching” and Surveying the following Council Property sales, in September 1983.?
Pre-Purchase Sale of Council House Property Search and Survey No.M44684 by B.R. Davies BS c Hartlepool Chief Engineer and Surveyor, dated September 1983.
Supported by the “Hand Written Property Survey Report” for the attention of the “Buyers” Solicitors “Levinson Walker & Lister “ of Hartlepool, Confirming that “ALL” the Land and Property Surveyed was “Recorded” and all “Details” on Land Title Deeds CE 74844 “Absolute” had been “Checked” and were “Validated” as “Correct” dated September 1983.
I Wish to make it quite Clear, this is not a Political Blog. I have Never said or have Written anything Detrimental about you as my Labour Member of Parliament for Hartlepool, but if you feel you are Unable for Whatever Reason, to Continue to Support my Campaign for Justice any longer, Please be advised that With or Without your Commitment, ( and I would Rather Have you Inside My Tent than Outside, )
I fully intend to Continue my Peaceful Protest -------Corruption Needs to be Challenged ,
I am the Innocent Victim of Fraud, with Sufficient Legal Documentation to Substantiate my Allegations, against both Land Registry and the named Council Officers in the Planning and Legal Departments of Hartlepool
Borough Council who are attempting to Sweep under the Carpet my legitimate Complaints of Fraud and Abuse of Public Office,
Consequently , because of the Legal Restriction place on me by the Parliamentary Ombudsman ,that it may affect the Parliamentary
Ombudsman’s Ability to Consider my Complaint if I was Planning to take Legal Action , (an option I wish to retain,) I cannot, therefore accept your Offer to Submit my Legitimate Claims of Property Fraud, to the Parliamentary Ombudsman,
In view of the Very Serious Nature of my Allegations
I am left with No alterative but to Submit a Formal Complaint to both the Chief Constables of Durham and Cleveland, to Request an Investigation into my Allegations of Land and Property Fraud, as I believe Officers of both Land Registry and Hartlepool Borough Council are Guilty of Conspiracy in Perverting the Course of Justice.