Monday, 3 December 2018

Letter to Land Registry


Monday, 03 December 2018

Dear Emily d’Albuquerque
I acknowledge and thank you for your six page back to back notes type letter I receive late on  Friday 23/11/2018, sent to my home address and not as I would have preferred to this site, WDTK.
To avoid any future misunderstandings
can I request that Land Registry do not send any future F.O.I. Correspondence to my home address but send it to this site-WDTK to ensure all replies to F.O.I. requests are
 Prominently Displayed in the Public Domain 
for all to see.

I find your response very interesting it is undoubtably well written but unfortunately, it contains a Catalogue of Plausible but very important factual errors?
                                I'll leave you to come to your own conclusions!
I do not doubt for a moment your Personal Honesty or your Integrity, but I believe you have been Deliberately given False Misleading Untruthful Evidenc
 by Officials of Land Registry Durham 
Simply to Hide the Truth of my allegations of Criminal 
 Misconduct and Property Fraud in Public Office 
Committed by Officials of LAND REGISTRAR Durha
My FOI request asked specific questions in order to ascertain the truth quickly and effectively-briefly

 I wished to know what British Laws allowed the assistant Land Registrar Durham Alan H Smith 
 To reject as 
Groundless and Irrelevant 
the legally authenticated Evidence of Purchase 
from Hartlepool Borough Council
Confirming the Purchase on the 1st February 1984 
and the letter dated the 16th February 1984
 from Land Registry Durham 
Validating the Transfer of the Total Area of Land and Property Purchased Title
“Sale of Council House” 48 Ridlington Way


Shown Clearly Edged in RED on the Land Registry Durham “Official Copy” of the Property Plan M44684 Dated September 1983
Pursuant to the Housing Act 1980
in Consideration of £5750.00 Pounds
(Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds)

Alan H Smith the assistant Land Registrar Durham
Was an Experienced Government Official?
employed in Public Office of a Government Department 
Land Registry Durham 
Believed to be a qualified Solicitor who must have known having legal knowledge
that he was clearly acting unlawfully and Committing Fraud Deliberately intending to Pervert, the Course of Justice
when he accepted the General Drawing
SP 78985 dated 1971 showing the Hartlepool Councils
West-View Council House Estate

Knowing it was NOT a Receipt of Purchase of Land and Property
by our Immediate next-door Neighbours from Hartlepool Borough Council
Alan H Smith the assistant Land Registrar Durham
an Experienced Government Land Registry Official
Considered this MAP of a Council House Estate
as Sufficient Evidence to indicate a Previous Purchase of
part of Our Registered Property CE74844 “Absolute”
by our Immediate next-door Neighbours 
to CHALLENGE the VERACITY of our Legal Purchase of the Ex-Council House 48 Ridlington Way West-View Hartlepool
from Hartlepool Borough Council
Pursuant the Housing Act 1980 on the 1st February 1984
in Consideration of £5750.00 Pounds
(Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds)

Disgraceful Conduct from a Government Official in Public Office
It questions the Legal Competence and Integrity of
ALL the Solicitors involved in the Sale and Purchase of the Ex-Council House Land and Property from Hartlepool Borough Council
including the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council
J. Anthony Brown

Who with Levinson Walker and Lister the “Buyers” Solicitors had Validated the Purchase of the Ex-Council House Land and Property PRIOR to the Exchange of Contracts and PRIOR to the Registration of the Land and Property with Land Registry on the 29/3/1984
  
There can be no doubt in my view that the assistant Land Registrar Durham Alan H Smith KNEW he had No Credible Evidence at All to Justify his Spurious Letter dated 14th October 2008 saying that Hartlepool Borough Council had made a MISTAKE when we had Purchased our Property- Registered Title CE74844 “Absolute” on the 1st February 1984

It was my belief that Alan H Smith the assistant Land REGISTRAR Durham deliberately Intended to
Frighten Intimidate Misinform and Deceive the TWO (2)

Very Elderly Vulnerable and Disabled Law- Abiding Innocent Tax Payers into Thinking and Believing that they might have done something Criminally Wrong when they had Purchased in all good faith the Ex-Council House Property 48 Ridlington Way West-View Hartlepool on the 1st February 1984 from Hartlepool Borough Council Pursuant to the Housing Act 1980 in Consideration of £5750.00 Pounds
(Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds)
Registered Title CE74844! Absolute

In my View a Clear Breach of the Malicious Communications Act 1988 and the Fraud Act 2006
It is my belief 
That "Misconduct” in Public Office is a Common Law Offence: it is not defined in any statute
It carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonmen

The offence requires that: a Public Officer acting as such; wilfully neglects to perform his or her duty and/or wilfully misconducts him or herself; to such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in the office holder; without Reasonable excuse or justification."

It is also my Understanding after reading your letter that you have found it difficult to locate some all my historic records relating to this matter?
 A Situation I honestly find unbelievable, as I was under the Impression that Land REGISTRY Durham
 was one (1) of the Main Depositaries of Registered Land and Property Titles in the Country.

I did expect Land Registry Durham would have retained
A Copy of the Letter Dated 16th February 1984 issued by Land Registry Durham themselves 
 Containing the “Official Copy” of the Property Plan M44684 Dated September 1983 
I have therefore taken the Liberty to attach a Copy for your Attention

Freehold Law 
was explained to me by my Solicitor “Solomon Levinson” Head of the Local Firm of Solicitors Levinson Waker and  Lister
of Church Street Hartlepool
Mr “Solomon Levinson” Explained to me  that in Common Law Jurisdictions, 
a Freehold is the Common Ownership of Real Property, or Land, and all immovable structures attached to such land,
When people buy their house “Freehold" they not only own the HOUSE, they also own ALL outbuilding on the land on which the house is built
. Please Note
the Outbuilding (Wash-House) shown on the Land Registry Durham “Official Copy” of the Property Land Plan No. M44 684 dated September 1983 
Registered Title CE74844 “Absolute”

 Shows Cleary it was-Completely Detached from our Immediate neighbours Property 46 Ridlington Way West-View Hartlepool
I believe it is also important to note the two (2) Valid Signatures of the 
Mayor J Jones and the Chief Executive Mr Abrahams and the date 3.11 1974

Confirming that the Total Area of Council Land and Properties of 48 Ridlington Way West-View including the Dwelling House-the Boundaries and Outbuildings Remained in the ownership of Hartlepool Borough Council. 

Which Clearly Contradicts Alan H Smith and YOUR  Statement that Part of the Detached Wash-House Building had been Purchased Previously by our Immediate Next-Door Neighbours from Hartlepool Borough Council from Hartlepool Borough Council 
Two (2) years earlier on the 3/11/1972

It is My Understand from my research of the Internet 
In English Common Law, 
A fee simple absolute is the most extensive interest
 in real property that an individual can possess

It is also my Understanding that this type of estate Registered Title CE74844 “Absolute”
was Created when the Deed of Purchase was Registered 
 by J Anthony Brown
the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council
with Land Registry Durham on the 29.3.1984.

it is limited Completely to the individual and his or her heirs and assigns forever that the Land is Owned Completely, and it is NOT subject to any limitations or Condition

The Official Copy Of the Property Plan No-M44684 dated September 1983

Hookway Adam -Correspondence

& enquiries Team Leader-
Customer Service 19th October 2009.
Head Office- Land Registry-Direct Line 020-7166-4831

Who said if the property is Conveyed and Registered an “Official Copy” of the Register of Title is “ALL” that is needed to prove ownership?

There is Sufficient authentic Documentary Evidence to Prove that our Immediate next-door Neighboursdid NOT Purchase any part of the Registered property CE74844 “Absolute” 
from Hartlepool Borough Council on the 3/11/1972

 There was No evidence of a purchase of Land and Property by our Immediate Neighbours from Hartlepool Borough Council, in 1972 
then there could NOT have been any Details of a  non-existing purchase of Land and Property 
Submitted by a Conveyance Solicitor 
to Officials of Land Registry Durham
 to accurately Record this non-existing Purchase in the Property or Proprietary Registers at Land Registry Durham?

Sufficient Evidence to Prove that there is Something radically dishonest happening at Land Registry Durham.

Rt. Hon Lord Denning the late Lord Chief Justice
 -said in  
His Appeal Court Ruling January 12.13.24.1956
 was –No Court in this Land will allow a person
  to keep an advantage, he has Obtained by FRAUD NO Judgement of a Court, NO order of a Minister
 can be allowed to stand if it has been Obtained by FRAUD –FRAUD unravels everything

It is my honestly held belief that I have a right being the Legal Registered Owner of the Land and Property CE74844 “Absolute” to challenge the B141 applicant/ plaintiff my immediate next-door neighboursand the assistant Land Registrar Durham Alan H Smith to Produce any evidence whatsoever to prove and validate the Controversial and Fraudulent Claims they had Previously made first in the letter from the assistant Land Registrar Durham dated the 14th October 2008
 When stating without ANY Credible Evidence that a Mistake had been made by Hartlepool Borough Council when we had purchased our Property on the 1st February 1984 Pursuant to the Housing Act 1980 on the 1st February 1984in Consideration of £5750.00 Pounds (Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds)

to Support this Spurious Claim. the assistant Land Registrar Durham Alan H Smith and our Immediate Neighbours Mr and Mrs E Bennison relied NOT on a Genuine Receipt of Purchase and Conveyance of any Property acknowledged by 
 Hartlepool Borough Council 
Confirming the Purchase by our Immediate Next-Door neighbours 
BUT on a General Drawing SP 78985 dated 1971 
Of Hartlepool Councils
 West-View Council House Estate

Alan H Smith the assistant Land Registrar Durham an Experience Government Official in Public Office 
Accepted this MAP of a Council House Estate 
as Sufficient Evidence of a Previous Purchase
 of part of the Registered Property Title CE74844 “Absolute”
 to CHALLENGE the VERACITY of our Purchase” of the Ex-Council House 48 Ridlington Way West-View; Hartlepool Pursuant to the Housing Act 1980 on the 1st February 1984 in Consideration of £5750.00 Pounds
(Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds)

Secondly, I Challenge the Untruthful and Fraudulent Claim made by the assistant Land Registrar Durham
 Alan H Smith in his Second letter dated the 3rd December 2008, 
When he Categorically stated that our immediate neighbours had previously purchased part of our Land and Property 48 Ridlington Way West-View Hartlepool Registered Title CE74844 “Absolute”
at a Meeting between the Mayor Aldermen and Burgees Hartlepool Borough Council and our immediate neighbours in November 1972
(this as since been proved to be incorrect)

I had been assured by Mr Solomon Levinson
that thorough searches of the Historical Records of All previous sales of Ex-Council House Properties
 had been made by the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council J Anthony Brown and Mr B.R. Davies BS.c 
the Chief Engineer and Land Surveyor 
the Hartlepool Councils Official authorised to Prepare all 
Pre-Sale Property Plans
Both had failed to discover any Mistakes made by Hartlepool Borough Council when selling the Ex-Council House Property 48 Ridlington Way PRIOR to the Exchange of Contracts and Registration of the Property at Land Registry Durham on the 29.3.1984
It was my Understanding that 
The most Important benefit of Registration of Land and Property is the Government Backed guarantee of Title which provides Compensation to an innocent person who suffers a financial loss because of a mistake in 
the register (for example) a mistake due to Fraud.

My original allegations of Misconduct in Pubic Office by Officials of Land Registry Durham
 Were Investigated by Mrs Dorrington the Land Registry Complaints Reviewer who awarded me payment of £300.00 pounds and an apology for mistakes made by
 officials of Land Registry Durham

I Refused to accept the payment of £300.00. Pounds and returned it to Land Registry London
I explained that for me to have accepted the Payment of £300.00 
would have indicated that I had accepted that their mistakes and the theft of part of my Registered Land and Property Title CE74844 “Absolute” had been innocently made by Alan H Smith assistant Land Registrar Durham and his Colleague Anthony Lowes

This is Simply NOT True- I have sufficient authentic Compelling evidence of Purchase that Proves I am the Innocent Victim of an Orchestrated Theft of Land and Property 
I maintain there was No Mistake made in the in the Land Register

Extensive Searches of ALL Previous Ex-Council House Sales
 have Proven that Hartlepool Borough Council did NOT sell part of our Ex-Council House Property Registered Title CE74844 “Absolute”
 to our Immediate neighbours  in 1972

Therefore, if there was NO purchase NO part of our Registered Title CE74844 “Absolute”  

Could Possible have been Conveyed by Solicitors on behalf of our Immediate neighbours Mr and Mrs E Bennison for Registration and Inclusion in their Land Title DU 37533
 at Land Registry Durham in 1972 

How then Can the Assistant Land Registrar Durham Alan H Smith and our Immediate neighbours Mr and MRs E Bennison claim there was a MISTAKE made in the Register at Land Registry Durham.
a Clear Indication of Criminal Deception and FRAUD.

Unfortunately, you have Stated that you have Enclosed a Copy of this elusive Conveyance of the Property in Dispute 
in your Letter to me dated 22 November 2018.
that was Incorrect! 
There was NO Copy of ANY description 
Enclosed in your letter

If the Non-inclusion of the elusive Document of Purchase and Conveyance of the Property by our Immediate next-door neighbours Mr and Mrs E Bennison from Hartlepool Borough Council in November 1972 
 was an Innocent Oversight on Your Part? 

Would you be kind enough to send a Copy to me.

I have been attempting for the Past (10) Ten Years to be Shown this Supposed Document of Purchase without SUCCESS 

It is my allegation which I maintain that I am the Innocent Vitim of an Orchestrated SCAM by those named Officials employed in Public Office of Land Registry Durham which I refuse to Withdraw

What Does Land Registry Durham Propose to do about It?
Report it the Proper Authorities- the Police?

You Cannot Continue to Ignore My Allegations

 The Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council J Anthony Brown PRIOR to the Exchange of Contracts also Validated the Purchase Documents as Correct as did Mr Solomon Levinson Senior Partner of the Legal Firm Levison Walker and Lister of Church Street Hartlepool

Documentary Evidence that Cleary Shows and Confirms that   
Alan H Smith assistant Land Registrar Durham
 Decision to alter some details on Land Title CE 74844 Absolute was 
Dishonest and Unlawful 
It was NOT Based on
Factual Legally accepted evidence of Previous Purchase 
by our next-door neighbours Mr and Mrs E Bennison 
from Hartlepool Borough Council in 1972

BUT

on a General Drawing No.78985 dated October 1971-
NOT a Receipt Indicating a Purchase of Property BUT a MAP 
 Clearly showing Hartlepool 
West-View Council House Estate

Clearly to abuse HIS Position of Trust in Public Office
and to Pervert the Course of Justice fully intending to "land grab" 
the Registered Proper in Dispute to Gain by Fraud and Criminal Deception a Financial Advantage for our immediate next-door neighbours !
It is my belief that Land Registry Durham have Failed to provide the requested evidence

 (no evidence provided – none exists)

I assume one of my first letters of Protest dated the 23rd October 2008, would be one of the missing (lost) records I sent to Land Registry Durham,

I say it’s unfortunate because the letter explains in detail all my concerns -and includes a “Official Copy” of the Property Plan M44684 dated September 1983
Title “Sale of Council House” 48 Ridlington Way West-View Hartlepool acknowledged by Hartlepool Bourgh Council and Confirmed, and Validated by Land Registry Durham in their Letter dated 16th February 1984

The “Official Copy” of Property Plan M44684 dated September 1983 (attached) Shows Quite Clearly the


ALAN HARVEY FLOUNDERS and His Wife JACQUELINGE FLOUNDERS
Pursuant to the Housing Act 1980 On the 1st February 1984
in Consideration of £5750.00 Pounds
(Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds)
Irrefutable Evidence of Purchase!

Alan H Smith the assistant Land Registrar Durham in his second letter to me dated 5th December 2008
Stated Categorically that a Conveyance of part of the property Title CE74844 Absolute had taken place between our immediate next-door neighbours and the Mayor Aldermen and Burgess of Hartlepool Borough Council on the 3rd November 1972

This was proved  to be Incorrect-
Here is other  example of more misleading evidence
in Public Office -

At a meeting held in the Main Offices of Land Registry Durham on the 17th December 2008 (a meeting requested by myself)

Both Alan H Smith the assistant Land Registrar Durham and his Colleague Anthony Lowes attended as Representatives of Land Registry Durham.

Our Immediate next -door neighbours Mr and Mrs E Bennison failed to attend this important  meeting to produce any documents of a Previous Conveyance of part of our Registered Land and Property CE74844 “Absolute”  which the  assistant Land Registrar Durham Alan H Smith had CATERGORICALLY stated in his last letter to me dated 5th December 2008, had taken place between Mr and Mrs E Bennison and the Mayor, Aldermen and Burgees of Hartlepool Borough Council in November 1972-

Surely it was up to the B141 Complainant our Immediate next-door neighbours Mr and Mrs E Bennison to Produce the Evidence of their alleged Previous Purchase of Part of Our Registered Land and Property CE74844 “Absolute” from Hartlepool Borough Council and the meeting between the Mayor Aldermen and Burgees in November 1972
to Challenge the VERACITY of our Purcha

I suspect that you have been deliberately been given false and misleading information, as was I believe was my previous 
Member of Parliament for Hartlepool Mr Iain Wright
 when he asked the Head of Land Registry to Investigate my original allegations of Property Fraud


they do NOT decide WHO’S or WHAT Property Details they see fit to Register-
 any Dispute must be settled in Court

It is my Understanding that If A and B are in dispute about ownership of a piece of land, the only question for the Court is which of the two of them has the better title to the land

- My Solicitor Mr SOLOMAN LEVINSON- Senior Partner in the LAW firm-LEVINSON WALKER & LISTER 
Church Street Hartlepool
had explained to us the meaning of “Freehold”
Prior to the Exchange of Contracts when arranging the Purchase of 48 Ridlington Way-
from Hartlepool Borough Council 
 on 1st February 1984 pursuant to the Housing Act 1980- 
in Consideration of £5,750.00”,
(Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds-)


In Common law jurisdictions, a freehold is the common ownership of real property, or land, and all immovable structures attached to such land, as opposed to a leasehold, in which the property reverts to the owner of the land after the lease period has expired.

For an estate to be a freehold, it must possess two qualities: immobility and ownership of it must be of an indeterminate duration.
 If the time of ownership can be fixed and determined, it cannot be a freehold



Mr Soloman Levinson Senior Solicitor of the law firm Levinson Walker and Lister-also personally requested the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Council-
 J Anthony Jones to obtain from the Hartlepool Council Chief Engineer & Senior Land Surveyors Officer B.R DAVIES-BS.c- 
the Official Responsible for preparing Pre-Sale Property Plans
to Further check- the accuracy of the Total area of Land and Property Purchased and transferred from Hartlepool Borough Council on the 1st February 1984 to ALAN HARVEY FLOUNDERS and His Wife JACQUELINE FLOUNDERS 
 “OFFICIAL COPY” of the 
Pre-Sale Property Plan-M 44684-dated September 1983-

Title “Sale of Council House” 
48 Ridlington Way West-View Hartlepool 
he informed me verbally that the whole of the Detached Wash House Building was part of our Freehold Property,
Please note and I have a Document to Prove that statement
The Boundaries of the estate including the Detached outbuildings can be clearly seen edged in RED on the “OFFICIAL COPY” of the Pre-Sale Property Plan-M 44684-dated September 1983-
Confirmed and signed by the Mayor J. Jones and Validated by the Chief Executive of Hartlepool Borough Council N.J. Abrahams

the Common Seal of Hartlepool was affixed in the presence of ALL dated 3/11/1974.?

This Validated Document Contradicts your Claim made in your letter of response that-as a result of H.M. Land Registry mistake on first Registration of each property a small outhouse was included within the RED Edging on the Title Plan to our Property CE74844 “Absolute” and ALSO within the RED Edging to the Title Plan to our neighbours Property 46 Ridlington Way -registered Title DU37533

Mr Solomon Levinson Senior Solicitor of the law firm Levinson Walker and Lister also explained that Under English Law-
No Two People can own the Same piece of Registered Freehold Land

When people buy their house, "freehold" they not only own the house, they also own the land on which the house is built

At the Meeting held in our Home 48 Ridlington Way in August 2008
at the Special Requested of our immediate neighbours

Mr and Mrs E Bennison to inspect and examine both sets of Title Deeds  
Mrs E Bennison Did NOT repeat Did NOT 
have a Property Plan Showing RED edging on any part of the Detached Wash-House Building on Registered Title CE74844 “Absolute “as your letter incorrectly states-nowhere have you included or provided even a photostat copy of any evidence whatsoever to validate the Purchase-of any property by the Plaintiff our immediate neighbours Mr and Mrs E Bennison from Hartlepool Borough Council in 1972

You state in your response to my FOI requests there is clear written evidence is the 1972 conveyance
to Mr and Mrs E Bennison and, in particular the plan to it.
You say the plan shows the area of land in question as included in the Conveyance. 
This is Completely Untrue-

I have repeatably requested a Copy for evidence for the past 10 years my last request for a copy was sent to Local Land Registrar, Durham on Saturday 21st June 2014 on WDTK site 
for the Attention of F.V. CLOUGH,
 without Reply.
This could only be construed by any normal right-thinking person,

that Malcolm Dawson O.B.E. Head of Land Registry, a Senior Civil Servant employed by Land Registry Deliberately and Wilfully Deceived and Misinformed Iain Wright M.P the Democratically Elected Member of Parliament for Hartlepool,

This Disrespectable Disgraceful Conduct was Totally Unacceptable and Seriously questions Malcolm Dawson’s O.B.E. Honesty, Integrity and Most Certainly Questions His claim in His letter to Iain Wright M.P. to have Fully Investigated my Serious allegations of Criminality & Misconduct in Public Office by the assistant Land Registrar, Alan H Smith and others at Land Registry Durham,

I have previously asked Land Registry Durham for a COPY of this document Described by the Head of Land Registry Malcolm Dawson O.B.E in his letter to Iain Wright M.P. the Member of Parliament for Hartlepool as an Authentic Copy of the Original Survey Plans to have Survived AFTER all the original survey plans had been Destroyed.

Unfortunately, I still feel highly suspicious but NOT unduly Surprised that Land Registry are still Unable to produce the claimed Authentic Copy of the Survey Plans that were NOT destroyed,

This could only be construed by any normal right- thinking person, that Malcolm Dawson O.B.E. Head of Land Registry, a Senior Civil Servant employed by Land Registry Deliberately and Wilfully Deceived and Misinformed Iain Wright M.P the Democratically Elected Member Of Parliament for Hartlepool,

The assistant Land REGISTRAR Durham Alan H Smith a experienced Professional Land Registry Official employed by a Government Department in a Position of Trust and Authority in Public Office

was in my view blatantly acting Unlawfully and Outside His REMIT when rejecting as Groundless and Irrelevant all the authentic documents of Purchase of our Registered Ex-Council Land and Property Title CE74844 “Absolute”
we purchased in all Good Faith
from Hartlepool Borough Council on the 1st February 1984 Pursuant to the Housing Act 1980 in Consideration of £5750.00 Pounds
(Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds)

an Experienced Government Land Registry Official

 employed in Public Office believed to be a qualified Solicitor must have known having legal knowledge
 He was clearly acting unlawfully and fraudulently 
intending to Pervert, the Course of Justice 
when he accepted the General Drawing (MAP) 
SP 78985 dated 1971 showing the Hartlepool Councils
West-View Council House Estate
 knowing it was NOT a Receipt of Purchase 
 from Hartlepool Borough Council of Land and Property
But he Alan H Smith the assistant Land Registrar Durham
an Experienced Government Land Registry Official

 Considered this MAP of a Council House Estate as Sufficient Evidence to indicate a Previous Purchase of 
part of Our Registered Property CE74844 “Absolute”

 by our Immediate next-door Neighbours to CHALLENGE the VERACITY of our Legal Purchase of the Ex-Council House 48 Ridlington Way West-View Hartlepool
from Hartlepool Borough Council 
Pursuant the Housing Act 1980 on the 1st February 1984 
in consideration of £5750.00 Pounds
(Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds)

Disgraceful Conduct from a Government Official in Public Office 
  It questions the Legal Competence and Integrity of ALL

the Solicitors involved in the Sale and Purchase of the Ex-Council House Land and Property from Hartlepool Borough Council
 including the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council 
J. Anthony Brown 
who with Levinson Walker and Lister the “Buyers” Solicitors had Validated the Purchase of the Ex-Council House Land and Property PRIOR to the Exchange of Contracts and PRIOR to the Registration of the Land and Property with Land Registry on the 29/3/1984

There can be No doubt in my view that the assistant 
Land Registrar Durham Alan H Smith  with his legal knowledge KNEW he had No Credible Evidence at All to Justify his  Spurious Letter dated 14th October 2008 saying that Hartlepool Borough Council had made a MISTAKE when we had Purchased our Property- Registered Title CE74844 “Absolute” on the 1st February 1984

This Letter was in my view, designed in Desperation  by the Assistant Land Registrar Durham Alan H Smith  fully  intending to

Frighten- Intimidate Misinform and Deceive the two (2) Elderly Disabled Law- abiding innocent tax payers into 
Thinking and Believing
that they might have done something Criminally Wrong
 when they had Purchased in all good faith the Ex-Council House property 48 Ridlington Way West-View Hartlepool
Registered Title CE74844! Absolute”
from Hartlepool Borough Council Pursuant to the Housing Act 1980 
on the 1st February 1984 in Consideration of £5750.00 Pounds
(Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds)


Your Sincerely

Alan Harvey Flounders

Copies:-

       






























Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)