DECEITFUL PLANNING OFFICERS
Wednesday, 18 June 2014
More Evidence of Planning Hanky Panky in Hartlepool
I firmly believe that Richard Trow case planning officer of Hartlepool Borough Council was the main instigator of this carefully orchestrated blatant attempt to obtain a certificate of lawfulness by any deceitful dishonest means available to him, he was in a position of trust and Influence - a position he unashamedly exploited for his own ends , he believed that without any involvement of any of the elected council planning committee he had unlimited powers – he believed he was above the law- untouchable- he could walk on water, and with the willing assistance of his colleague Mr.Reece development control manager he took full advantage of their unique positions of Delegated Authority & Responsibility and “GRANTED” the Controversial Retrospective Planning application H/2009/0568 Although both these senior Planning Officials were fully aware that part of the building of a kitchen extension had been illegally erected on a neighbours Registered Freehold Private Land and Property & was Definitely NOT in the Ownership of the Retrospective planning applicant.
A blatant criminal breach of the Town and Country Planning Act 1999, sections 65 (5) and 65(6)
It Should be remembered, it was Richard Trow Hartlepool Councils Planning Officer, who had admitted to me at the Meeting held in Brian Hanson House that he was the Architect/Draughtsman engaged by the Planning Applicants, Not Only to supply the detailed Drawing for the New Kitchen Extension, but to Personally assist and advise them on how best to obtain Planning approval from Hartlepool Planning Authority
Richard Trow was quite Confident & Rightly so, that planning approval would be eventually be granted, by Hartlepool Planning Authority, Little did I know then, that He would be ultimately have the opportunity to sit in Judgement on his OWN Planning Project, and Grant Planning Approval to the Planning applicants H/2009/0568 despite all the Over whelming protests & Irrefutable Documentary Legal Evidence of Legal Registered Land & Property Owners.
NOT Surprising when one considers that Both these Hartlepool Highly Paid Council Officials,Who have NO repeat NO Legal Qualifications Whatsoever, Contemptuously Dismissed as of No importance the Legal Guidance Notes for Local Council to Follow BEFORE Granting a Certificate of Lawfulness to applicants Seeking Retrospective Planning Permission who had Previously& Deceitfully built Extensions without applying for Council Approval handed down by High Court Judge Sir Thayne Forbes when sitting in the Queen’s Bench Division on the 3rd February 2010 when Dismissing an appeal by Robert Fidler pursuant to s289 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990.
I Believe that the actions of Both Richard Trow Hartlepool Council Planning Officer & Mr Reece , Hartlepool Development Control Manager were Dishonest & Criminal in Intent , When they deliberately GRANTED planning permission to the legally flawed Retrospective Planning Application H2009/0568 , I believe they acted illegally in Public Office with the intention of making a gain for themselves or someone else by inflicting a loss or a risk of loss on another a clear breach of s4 of the FRAUD ACT 2006,