MORE PLANNING HANKY PANKY IN MONKEY TOWN

Tuesday 10/6/2014

In my view it is vitally important if not essential to understand the Major Part if not the most Important Critical Part  played  by Richard Trow   Hartlepool Council Planning Officer enthusiastically  assisted  by Mr. Reece,  the Development Control Manager who together Deliberately  Conspired to Pervert the Course of Justice when they  jointly Decided to  “Grant” a Highly Controversial Retrospective Planning Application H/2009/0568 for a friend, knowing the application was Legally Flawed.

 I Seriously Question the personal integrity   of Richard Trow and his  involvement in this Highly Controversial Retrospective Planning Application, when one considers that he  himself admitted to me at our first meeting  held in  Brian Hanson House in August/September 2008 * that he was the Architect/Draughtsman personally engaged by the Retrospective Planning Applicants NOT only to Design the Detailed Drawing for the New Kitchen Extension but to assist and Personally advise the Planning applicants on HOW Best to obtain Planning approval from Hartlepool Planning Authority,

It is Important to note that Richard Trow, was employed by Hartlepool Borough Council as a Planning Officer &  would have been or should have been  fully  Conversant &  knowledgeable on HOW, Retrospective Planning approval could  be Quietly  and Discretely achieved  for the  Disputed Retrospective Planning  application H/2009/0568 he knew it   Contained  False Claims of Property “Ownership” & was therefore  Legally Flawed.- WITHOUT - It  should  be noted , the involvement of any of the Democratically Elected Councillors on the Hartlepool Planning Committee, No Consultation, No Seeking Guidance or Legal  Advice  for such a Disputed Controversial Retrospective Planning Application

Hindsight is a wonderful thing- there can be little doubt now, WHY Richard Trow’s was so Confident and Certain at the Meeting held  in  Brian Hanson House August/September 2008 *  that the Initial  Planning application H/2008/0467 later change to that legally flawed  Controversial Retrospective Planning application H/2009 0568 would be approved & eventually granted planning permission  by Hartlepool Planning authority,

He Himself Richard Trow Hartlepool Councils Planning Officer  on assuming  personally responsible for this Project H/2009 0568 assisted by Mr Reece Control Planning Manager  would use  HIS  Delegated  Power of Authority in the total  absence of the Hartlepool Planning Committee to decide the final outcome of this Highly Controversial Retrospective Planning Application.

A  Very Unhealthy  Situation  for a  Council Officials to be placed in, there is always the Suspicion even  the  Possibility which has happen before- that Council  Officials Particularly Planning Officers  when dealing with a Strongly Disputed  Controversial  Retrospective Planning application as H/2009/0568  could be offered and have  accepted  some  kind of inducement it need not be money, to adopt a dishonest course of action  by  Granting Planning approval for a Strongly  Disputed  Retrospective  Planning  Application, although fully Conscious  that this Particular Retrospective Planning application  Contained False Claims of Property “Ownership” & was therefore  Legally Flawed.

Imagine  the following  Scenario,  a  School Boy Placed in a very Similar Position, alone in his classroom WITHOUT  any School Teachers  present  being allowed to Alter or Mark  his  OWN  Examination Papers, would it be a Complete and Utter Surprise  to find the School Boy had passed his examination with flying colour, even Top Marks .

It is Important to keep in mind,  that Richard Trow the Planning Officer for this Project had been informed on Numerous Occasions has had Hilary Martin, F,O.I. Officer,  Alyson Carman, Solicitor & Complaints Reviewer, (who had requested &  been given  an Official Copy of the Register of Title in  December 2008 )  and  Paul Burgon, Enforcement Officer, that the Retrospective Planning applicants H/2009/0568 – had  NOT  repeat had NOT Purchased from Hartlepool Borough Council in 1972,  any of the Disputed  Property, and therefore DID NOT repeat DID NOT OWN any of the Freehold Land & Property their Illegally built Kitchen Extension  had  been Built on,

Rt. Hon Lord Denning , Lord Chief Justice  His Appeal Court Ruling January 12.13.24.1956 was –No Court in this Land  will allow a person  to keep an  advantage he has Obtained by FRAUD , NO  Judgement of a Court, NO order of a Minister can be allowed to stand if it has been Obtained by FRAUD –FRAUD unravels  everything.

It is also important to Remember that both Richard Trow Planning Officer and Mr Reece, Development Control Manager, were Both Well Paid Senior Council Planning Officials employed in Positions of Trust in  Public  Office, although  neither were Legally Qualified. it was NOT in my view, Unreasonable for members of the General Public to have expected BOTH these Highly Paid  Senior Council Officials employed by Hartlepool  Borough Council in the Planning Department  to have  at Least a  Basic Working Knowledge  if  NOT  Fully Conversant with the Town & Country Planning Act 1990, & Both  Should have known  that Ownership Certificates A.B.C & D. are a Statutory Requirement under Sections 65(5) of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990

I was also Informed In answer to a Freedom Information request I made to the Office of the Secretary of State for Communities and local Government, the Right Honourable ERIC PICKLES M.P.  

It is  a Criminal Offence under Section 65(6) of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 to issue a Certificate Knowing it Contains False or Misleading information.

The Right Honourable Eric Pickles MP

I

Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

The local Planning authority, in this case, Richard Trow, the Hartlepool Council Planning Officer, assisted by   Mr. Reece, Development Control Manager, KNEW  or Should  Have KNOWN they   “Must Not Entertain” an application for Planning  Permission  Unless  the Relevant Certificates  Concerning  the Ownership” of the Applicants  Site have been Completed  Stating the “Ownership” of the Property

Copies to be sent to the under mentioned although ALL have been previously made aware of the Corrupt Situation festering in Hartlepool

Iain Wright Member of Parliament for Hartlepool.

The Right Honourable Eric Pickles M.P.

De-Brus Ward Labour Councillors, BOB COOK. SYLVIA TEMPEST.SHEILA GRIFFIN.

 NONE of the above named Labour Councillors have sought fit to acknowledge or even attempted to contact me to explain .WHY my Serious Criminal  Allegations have been Ignored, Instead  they collectively instructed PETER DEVLIN believed to be the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool to write to me to me to say in essence ,that if I have any other Critical Comments  to make, I should submit them to him first & NOT  to my elected ward Labour Councillors,

This is Freedom of Speech Hartlepool  NEW LABOUR   Style, an obvious attempt to  TRY and INTIMIDATE  or  FRIGHTEN this  OLD FART, they know I am an OCTOGENARIAN  & Hope I will Just Fade Away,

They  ALL Know  a Simple visit to my Home as was undertaken by ROB COOK ( a Genuine Incompetent  would be Politision  Compulsive Liar ) prior to his election  as the De-Brus Ward Councillor,   would quickly establish and Prove my Allegation Correct.

There can be no room for Misunderstanding or Further Doubts when one considers the Previous favourable & Extra Special treatment given to this Particular Retrospective Planning Applicant H/2009/0568

(a)            Being allowed to Operate a Business enterprise from a Council House , Strictly Prohibited in  Council Tenancy agreements

(b)            Allowed to Purchase their Council House Property in 1972, at a Time of a Critical National Shortage of Social Housing- a Privilege denied to others.

(c)             Allowed to Continue Operating  a Business Enterprise in their  newly Purchased Ex-Council House , although expressly Prohibited in  the Registered Land Title Covenants

Shocking - Unbelievable  - BUT TRUE - Once you get over your initial shock, you will no longer doubt MY Allegations that All  the Undermentioned Council Officials , Richard Trow, Planning Officer, Hilary Martin, F,O.I. Officer Alyson Carman, Solicitor & Complaints Reviewer, (who had requested &  been given  an Official Copy of the Register of Title in  December 2008 and  Paul Burgon, Enforcement Officer, Conspired -Collaborated with the Retrospective Planning Applicants H/2009/0568 to Pervert the Course of Justice, & to Falsely Claim  by Criminal Deception “Ownership” of Registered Land & Property NOT in their Registered Title !

Please Note, If anything I have Written or Published is NOT TRUE – Why have NONE repeat NONE  of the  named Hartlepool Council Individuals Disputed any of my allegations, NOR Commenced ANY Legal Proceeding against ME for Slander, or whatever other crimes they can think of, BUT remember  a Council Cannot Sue for Libel ( Derbyshire  vs  Sunday Times , House of Lords. 1993 ) NOR can it Indemnify a Councillor or Council Officer who wishes to Sue an Individual (Local authorities  indemnity  for Members and Officers ) order 2004 ?

Yours Sincerely

Alan Harvey Flounders

Does Culture of LIES and DECEIT Still Exist in Land Registry,

IF YOU DO'NT PROTEST  WHEN YOU KNOW  YOU HAVE BEEN SHAFTED--THEN ALL THOSE GALLANT  BOYS WHO DIED ON D-DAY GAVE THEIR  LIVES IN VAIN. STAND UP AND BE COUNTED-THE NAME OF THIS  GAME - IS NAME & SHAME

Sent on Thursday 5/6/2014   to   PAUL TROTTER- LAND REGISTRY

Dear Paul

Thank you for your apology for the delay in answering my F.O.I. request, “Please Confirm Existence and supply a Copy of the Authentic Copy of Original Survey Plans” submitted on the 2^nd May 2014, and your explanation as follows –

I refer to your e-mail dated 2^nd MAY 2014, and I must first apologise   for the Delay In Dealing With Your Enquiry.

 In View Of The Contents I Am Referring This Matter To One Of Our Senior Officers And He Will Consider It As Soon As Possible, I Should Say However That The Senior Officer Concerned Is Here In The Office To-Day And Tomorrow, But Is Then Away For A Further Week Or So, It May Be That He Is Unable To Contact You Further Until His  Return , Regards,  PAUL TROTTER,

My Reply  to Land Registry 5^th June 2014 

 I am a little Disappointed  and Bewildered  that  my Simple  F.O.I. Request  for a copy of the "Authentic Copy" of the Survey  Plans  that the Head of Land Registry , MALCOLM DAWSON O.B.E  assured IAIN WRIGHT  M.P.  Member of Parliament for Hartlepool, was available, now appears Difficult to Produce for Inspection ?

If I don’t receive a Copy of this Document in the next fourteen (14) days I believe I will be justified in reporting the Matter to a Higher Authority.Link to th

WHO QUALIFIES & WHAT SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED -APART FROM MONEY-TO RECEIVE SPECIAL & FAVOURABLE TREATMENT FROM HARTLEPOOL PLANNING AUTHORITY

 

 

Tuesday  3rd  June 2014

To avoid any misunderstanding, I neglected to include & failed to fully  Emphasis the Vital if not the  Major Part played in this Disgraceful Planning affair, by Richard Trow, the Harrtlepool Councils Planning Officer, he was , the prime mover, personally involved, from  day one- in this deliberate attempt to Pervert the Course  of  Justice,  He was without doubt the orchestra  leader of these  despicable band of Dishonest scoundrels ,

It should be remembered that in addition to being the Planning Officer and Monitoring Officer for this Controversial Retrospective Building Project, He was also the draughtsman, hired by the Planning Applicants for the supply of the drawings, for the new kitchen extension,  Built on Registered Freehold  Land & Property  he  KNEW was NOT in the Ownership of the Controversial Planning Applicants.  He will be exposed for what he is, in my next Article

 

 WHO QUALIFIES & WHAT SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED -APART FROM MONEY-TO RECEIVE SPECIAL & FAVOURABLE TREATMENT FROM HARTLEPOOL PLANNING AUTHORITY

Culture of Lies and Deceipt Still Exists in Land Registry, Part 2

This letter was posted to Iain Wright M.P. on Wednesday Evening 28^th May 2014.at 10.00 p.m.

Dear Iain Wright M.P.  Member of Parliament for Hartlepool, 

To-day Wednesday 28^th May 2014, I am pleased to report that I have received your written response, to my last  letter, a Culture of Lies and Deceipt Still Exists in Land Registry, Durham. Dated 27^th April 2014 Regarding my allegations of Criminal Misconduct in Public Office against Officials of Land Registry, Durham.

I am also pleased to note that you have Reproduced and sent a copy of my letter, (still available on this site,) outlining my Criminal  allegations to Mr Ed Lester, Chief Land Registrar and Chief  Executive of Land Registry, Head Office, Trafalgar House, 1 Bedford  Park, CRO 2AQ.

One Can Only Hope that Mr Ed Lester, Chief Land Registrar and Chief Executive of Land Registry, has more Knowledge and Understanding of the Land Registration Act 1925, L.R.A 2002, And is fully aware of Land Registry’s Published Guides Particularly Public Guide N0.8. March 2011, which replaced the August 2009 edition. Explaining   WHY Registering Title to Land so Important, because  it provides an up-to-date OFFICIAL RECORD OF WHO OWNS LAND- A  REGISTERED TITLE IS GUARANTEED

I also believe that in the Interests of Justice,  Mr Ed Lester, Chief Land Registrar and Chief Executive of Land Registry, Does NOT repeat the Mistakes of the Previous Head of Land Registry, Malcolm  Dawson O.B.E. who appeared to Support Alan H Smith,  the Assistant Land Registrar DURHAM,  who,  It is Important to Remember- accepted Two (2) Coloured Photographs of an Outside Toilet Door,   as Greater Proof of Ownership of Freehold Property and Rejected as Groundless  the  original land title deeds CE74844 “Absolute” REGISTERED with Land Registry DURHAM –by the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough J Anthony Brown on the 29^th 3. 1984 ?

In addition to Rejecting all the other Bona Fide Legal Documentation associated with the Sale & Purchase in all Good Faith from Hartlepool Borough Council, of the Ex-Council House Freehold Land & Property- including an “Official Copy” of the Register of Title CE74844 “Absolute” Issued by Land Registry Durham Themselves on the 10^th October 2008, showing the Entries in the Register of Title CE74844 “Absolute” on the 9^th October 2008 at 10.55.27.

 (Under s67 of the Land Registration Act 2002 this “Official Copy” is admissible in Evidence to the same extent as the Original)

Also Rejecting as Irrelevant was the Pre-Purchase Land & Property Survey No.M44684, undertaken by the Chief Engineer & Senior Surveyor of Hartlepool Borough Council, B.R.Davies  B.Sc .dated September 1983, Titled “Sale of Council House”, Which very Clearly Shows, without any “Misunderstanding” all the Freehold Land  & Property including the “Outbuildings” Purchased in All Good Faith from Hartlepool Borough Council in February 1984 !

I await, like yourself Mr Iain Wright M.P. in anticipation , for Mr Ed Lesters Explanation, WHY- the  Original Registered Land Title Documents  CE74844 “Absolute” and an “Official Copy” of the Title , and all the other Bona-Fide Survey Documents  can be Rejected as Groundless and  Classed as Irrelevent by Alan H Smith assistant Land Registrar, Durham. BUT two (*2) Coloured Photographs of an Outside Toilet Door can be accepted as Greater Proof of Property  Ownership,

While I appreciate your Support,  I am Disappointed to Record, that you have not Commented on my other Serious allegations Of Criminal Misconduct by Hayley Martin, Alyson Carman, Mr. Reece Paul Burgon  all Paid Council Officials employed in the Planning and Legal Departments of Hartlepool Borough Council who Conspired and Colluded to “Grant” a Retrospective Planning application H/2009/0568, Knowing the Planning application Contained False & Misleading Claims of  “Property Ownership” a Blatant & Deliberate Breach of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990.

It has taken quite some time for me to Compile these Criminal activities , I have fought a long lonely battle for my allegations to be taken seriously by the authorities,  these allegation may date  back a few years, that does not make them  any less disgraceful  and unlawful,  nor should it be a reason for the authorities, to take them less seriously, there must be a thorough  investigation of the allegations of FRAUD, and the deliberate attempt  to cover up Criminal Misconduct  in Public Office, and the attempt by Paid Council Officials to Pervert the Course of Justice,         

As a Victim  I Deserve Nothing Less !

I believe most honest people now accept that there is a major problem of Corruption in local government and that it is time for genuine action.  a few of the issues are likely to continue, but most will fester if they are not addressed.

Yours Sincerely

Alan Harvey Flounders

UPDATE OF DEMOCRACY - HARTLPOOL STYLE

Status update-

To-Day is the Day - The Good  People Of Hartlepool Can Vote-  and I Hope Help Rid Us Of A Corrupt Labour  Dominated  Local Council ! Remember   we once had a Lovely Hospital, till the Present Group of Self Interested Labour Scoundrels Decided  Otherwise !

It up to You- If You Can’t be Bothered to Vote them Out, You Will Only Get What You Deserve!- Nothing !

My Own Experiences  of Serious Criminal Misconduct and Special  Favourable Treatment for Some, ( No one  mentioned Brown Envelopes )   are well  known to Our  Labour Member of Parliament  for Hartlepool Iain Wright M.P.  & the Three (3) Elected  LABOUR Councillors  for the DE-BRUS Ward!  ROB COOK-    SHEILA GRIFFIN – SYLVIA TEMPEST

THIS IS DEMOCRACY -- HARTLEPOOL STYLE

Monday 19^th May 2014.

 I have been following  an excellent site Real Whitby,  for a couple of years now, I was so impressed when I first read it, I now have my own amateur web Site I have always found NIGEL WARDS  articles and those of TIM THORNE and many others on  the  Real Whitby  site,  to be well written and  very easily to  follow, NIGEL WARDS  most recent article  make his  points quite clearly, even to and old fart like me,  I have to say  that a very, very,  similar situation of blatant Council  Corruption - exists here in Hartlepool, to this very day?  it is Unbelievable  when One remembers that Hartlepool have had a Labour Dominated Council for the Past 50 Years- a Political Party that Continually  Shouts about  Fair Play and Democracy but here in Hartlepool  they Certainly Do Not Practice What they Preach !

NIGEL WARD clearly  Highlights the Blatant Disgraceful  Corruption that Exists in Scarborough  Council, on the evidence he produces they certainly appear  to be a little bit ? but not much worse than Hartlepool !

I too have personally experienced similar problems, of Blatant Corruption-  my three (3) DE-BRUS Labour Ward Councillors, SHEILA GRIFFIN----SYLVIA TEMPEST----ROB COOK--- when supplied with overwhelming documentary  evidence of Hartlepool  Council Officials  Criminal Misconduct , failed  to take any action whatsoever- their Combined actions was to report my allegations  of Criminality by Unelected Paid Officials of  Hartlepool Borough Council, to the Town Solicitor   PETER DEVLIN who’s reaction on hearing of my Criminal Allegations Criminal Misconduct committed by  some of HIS  Paid Officials, in both the Legal and Planning Departments of Hartlepool Borough Council, was to write to me- saying that any further critical comments I wish to make-  should be addressed to him  and NOT to my  Elected Ward Representatives- this unhealthy suspicious situation, clearly indicates to me- that  genuine complaints to the authorities  may be kicked into the long grass- that  he- PETER DEVLIN- and he alone- an Unelected Highly  Paid Council Official of Hartlepool Borough Council- will decide if any of  my truthful  Critical Comments etc. etc. are to be  passed on to my Elected Ward  Councillors, that decision  is I believe unlawful,  It clearly Breaches  my Human and Legal rights-  although  I am a  Honest Law a Biding  Council  Tax Payer- I am  being deliberately denied my Democratic Right  to Contact my Democratically Elected Ward Representatives,  although it should be noted for the records- and , from my personal experiences  neither  GRIFFIN—TEMPEST- COOK- because of their Combined  Incompetence-  are suitable people to represent ANYONE on Hartlepool Borough Council ! Be Careful- VERY Careful- Who You Vote for on Thursday ? Believe me - It could happen to You !

                         That is Democracy – Hartlepool Style