TAXI -TAXI, Where the Hell is My TAXI -SHITHEAD?

TAXI-TAXI,Where the Hell is My TAXI--SHITHEAD?

Have any of YOU been  awakened at 2.30 a.m. by a Drunken Foul Mouthed Man Knocking and  Shouting  in a loud Voice “Where’s My F***** Taxi SHITHEAD,    I HAVE , ? On a Number of Occasions,


 It’s Not Funny, it’s  very Difficult if Not Impossible to Explain to a Drunken Slob, at 2.30 a.m. that he is Knocking at the Wrong Door, he  should be Knocking  at my Neighbours Door, they are the “Owners” and “Operators” of the TAXI Business, Not Me, he Eventually Leaves, after Waking up all the Bairns, but Not
before telling me that I am A Complete Arsehole,? Unbelievable, but True, , but then it Could Only Happen  in Hartlepool, after All is Said and Done, a Town that Elects Mandelson Must Be Dolalee ?

 I was Wrong,  Not to  Complain at the Time, I though like many others,  did not wish to cause any trouble, how wrong I was all those years ago .but then age and  Hind Site is a Wonderful Thing ?

My Latest F.O.I. request to Hartlepool Borough Council, copies sent to Iain Wright M.P. for Hartlepool ,
and "All" three (3) of the Councillors for the De-Brus Ward,? No doubt they will just ignore me once again, Corruption in Public Office is Endemic in Little old Hartlepool.? but Right or Wrong I intend to Continue,

Friday, 21 September 2012

 Dear Freedom of Information Officer

The Land Title Deeds of my Freehold Land and Property, I Purchased from Hartlepool Borough Council in 1984, when the Legal Ownership of the Freehold Land and Property was Transferred, Registered and Filed in both the Property Register and the Proprietorship Register  at Land Registry on the 29th.3.1984,  Contains  a number of what I believe to be Legal  Restrictive Covenants ? Prohibiting Certain activities, such as :-
1.
 Not to carry on “ANY” Trade, Business or Occupation, or do any act which might be Noxious or Offensive to Any Person Occupying  Land in the Neighbourhood. ? I wish to know did the same restrictions apply to Council House Tenants .?

My Freedom of Information Questions are as Follows,
(a)
Did Hartlepool Borough Council have a  Council House Tenancy Agreement or Similar Document,  which clearly Authorised or  Prohibited, a Weekly Paying Council House Tenant to Commence operating a Commercial Business Enterprise, from their Council House Premises ?
(b)
If the answer is “YES”  could you please supply to me a Copy of All and Any Documentation Agreement ,  Prohibiting or Authorising  a Weekly Paying Council House Tenant to Commence operating a Commercial Business Enterprise, from their Council House Premises ?
(c )
If the Answer is “YES” would you please tell me  how many Rent
Paying Council House Tenants  applied to Hartlepool Borough Council  for permission to operate a Commercial Business Enterprise, from their Council House Premises ?
Please note I am “NOT” asking for Personal Details subject to the Data Protection Act,  simply the Total Number of Applicants  who applied , if Any.
(d)
If a Rent Paying  Council House Tenant was  Given Council Permission to Operate an Commercial Business, were they subjected to any increase in their weekly Rent Paid to Hartlepool Borough Council,  and were they also  Required  to pay  a Business tax. ? And to whom,?
And was the immediate neighbours of the Rent Paying Council House Tenants operating a Commercial Business for Profit,  Consulted , Regarding  their right to Object on Grounds of  General Public Nuisance .

Yours Sincerely

TAXI--TAXI-Where 's My TAXI--SHITHEAD?

An update of my Latest Request to Hartlepool Borough Council, and of Copies to Sent to
Iain Wright M.P. for Hartlepool , and  “ALL” three (3) Councillors of the De-Brus Ward.
Sylvia Tempest (Labour)
Rob Cook (Labour)
Sheila Griffin (Labour)

Have any of YOU been  awakened at 2.30 a.m. by a Drunken Foul Mouthed Man  Shouting  in a loud voice “Where’s My F***** Taxi)  I HAVE, It's  not Funny, but Like many others, I didn't Like to Complain, I now realise, a little late, It does NOT work, if you let them walk over you ,they just return,  I now fight my Corner, Complain,  Raise you Voice, Complain again, ,  Hartlepool Council if a byword for Corruption,  just read this Blog, I have no reason to lie, and if any Council Official in Public Office, wishes to sue me, Go ahead ,


Friday, 21 September 2012

 Dear Freedom of Information Officer

The Land Title Deeds of my Freehold Land and Property, I Purchased from Hartlepool Borough Council in 1984, when the Legal Ownership of the Freehold Land and Property was Transferred, Registered and Filed in both the Property Register and the Proprietorship Register  at Land Registry on the 29th.3.1984,  Contains  a number of what I believe to be Legal  Restrictive Covenants ? Prohibiting Certain activities, such as :-
1.
 Not to carry on “ANY” Trade, Business or Occupation, or do any act which might be Noxious or Offensive to Any Person Occupying  Land in the Neighbourhood. ? I wish to know did the same restrictions apply to Council House Tenants .

My Freedom of Information Questions are as Follows,
(a)
Did Hartlepool Borough Council have a  Council House Tenancy Agreement or Similar Document,  which clearly Authorised or  Prohibited, a Weekly Paying Council House Tenant to Commence operating a Commercial Business Enterprise, from their Council House Premises ?
(b)
If the answer is “YES”  could you please supply to me a Copy of All and Any Documentation Agreement ,  Prohibiting or Authorising  a Weekly Paying Council House Tenant to Commence operating a Commercial Business Enterprise, from their Council House Premises ?
(c )
If the Answer is “YES” would you please tell me  how many Rent
Paying Council House Tenants  applied to Hartlepool Borough Council  for permission to operate a Commercial Business Enterprise, from their Council House Premises ?
Please note I am “NOT” asking for Personal Details subject to the Data Protection Act,  simply the Total Number of Applicants  who applied , if Any.
(d)
If a Rent Paying  Council House Tenant was  Given Council Permission to Operate an Commercial Business, were they subjected to any increase in their weekly Rent Paid to Hartlepool Borough Council,  and were they also  Required  to pay  a Business tax. ? And to whom,?
And was the immediate neighbours of the Rent Paying Council House Tenants operating a Commercial Business for Profit,  Consulted , Regarding  their right to Object on Grounds of  General Public Nuisance .

Yours Sincerely

Another Employee of Land Registry Convicted of Fraud

Thanks Jean for your Interest, but to bring you up to date, and answer your question,  I thought that I had already reported it to the Information Commissioner? on the 17th May 2010, without, I may say,  any Success  (copy of my request is still available on this Site)

While I thank you for your advice and  your previous annotation, I feel it would be utterly pointless to
 report anything  further to the Information Commissioner? Who I believe , is totally unfit for purpose,

I did Contact My Member of Parliament for Hartlepool  Iain Wright M.P. who in turn contacted Richard Dawson O.B.E. who it was claimed, was the  Head of Land Registry to investigate Internally my Serious Allegations of Criminal activities in the Offices of Land Registry Durham,?

Surprise, Surprise,  Richard Dawson O.B.E  found nothing wrong with the Conduct of any of his own employees in Land Registry, Durham.

evidently my time and dated   “Official Copy” of the entries in the register of title on the 9th October 2008, at 10.55.27 issued on the 10th October 2008, from Land Registry, Durham  filed in the Land Register on 29th.3. 1984.
Which  under s67 of the Land Registration Act 2002, is admissible in evidence to the same extent as the “Original” ,  is “Groundless” when Compared to a Coloured Photograph of an Outside Toilet Door,?

 Malcolm Dawson O.B.E, did say the “Original” Plans had been Destroyed,? BUT a Copy of the Plan,  was retained, and could be accepted as an “Authentic” copy of the Original Plan, ? Not you will note, A timed and dated “Official Copy” of the entries in  the register of Title ,which under s67 of the Land Registration Act 2002, is admissible in evidence  to the same extent as the Original. ? An Unbelievable statement  from the HEAD of Land Registry.

If Land Registry are “ not aware of” or don’t  see, any evidence of Criminal  activity, then they can't be criticised for not reporting it to the Proper Authorities ?
However, in this case, it is obvious that Malcolm Dawson O.B.E,.  Head of Land Registry,  did not wish to Report my Criminal Allegations to the Authorities, ? Why,  was it beyond Possibility  the Wrongdoer was one of their own employees,  ?

I think it should be noted, in March 2012, an Employee of Land Registry for 33 years was Convicted at Southwark Crown Court after being found guilty of abusing her position of trust , Her fraud involved nine identified properties but Scotland Yard suspect that many more homes may have changed hands illegally,  my personal experiences of Land Registry, makes me believe that this was NOT an Isolated Incident and may yet prove to be just the tip of the Iceberg, I am Certainly NOT finished,

Further Progress will be published ,