Friday, 22 July 2016

AN OUTSTANDING EXAMPLE OF A LABOUR PARTY HYPORCRITE


Friday, 22 July 2016
Definition- of -a Hypocrite-a pretence of having a virtuous character, moral- socialist beliefs  principles, etc., that he does not really possess. See more.
There was a report broadcast on T.V. to-day- highlighting the activities of the Hartlepool Member of Parliament-Iain Wright-criticizing the Scandalous   Disgraceful behaviour of Mike Ashley-owner of the sports firm-and also owner of Newcastle Football Club- whether Mike Ashley is a Complete scoundrel I know Not- what I do know is that Iain Wright- the Labour Party Representative in the Palace of Westminster for the People of Hartlepool -is a complete “Hypercrite” who- in my view- and I believe many others- will do anything to gain public support- give interviews- make silly comments-anything- but what he is paid to do- represent his own town constituents-
Most people will find it difficult to believe that- Members of Parliament and Town Councillors need NO qualifications whatsoever- NO basic educational or even any work experience-and many don’t have any skills that would help them to do their job, what many Hartlepool Labour Councillors do possess in abundance, is a nasty arrogant attitude, they actually seriously think that they are doing a good job-and honestly believe they can do no wrong? The latest episode of stupidity is the announced demolition of the Jackson Landing-
Most if not all will certainly not admit to any mistakes- some will blatantly Lie- that they never said this or never said that- despite overwhelming evidence of their dishonest and outrageous comments-exist- it was NOT -my fault, is their cry, what is even more alarming is that they have the audacity to pass the buck, deny all and any involvement – in any controversial issue- even to delegate their functions- to even less qualified and experienced Council Staff, if that scenario is at all possible- an example is the Council Planning Committee- who do this often, particularly whenever any Controversial Planning application are submitted under the counter- for a consideration –of course-  such as my Objection- to- retrospective planning application H/2009/0568.-

Despite our objection it was  illegally built on our property- causing serious damage to our property- they hadn’t even applied for planning consent for their kitchen and toilet extension- but having friends in the know- where granted retrospective planning- permission-they even tried to alter our registered details of freehold property ownership- at Land Registry-Durham-despite having no credible documentary evidence- or proof of purchase of the freehold property built on- where as we have irrefutable documentary evidence of purchase-in all good faith- of the ex-council house freehold property-Title-CE74844 “Absolute” we purchased-from Hartlepool Borough Council-on the 1st February 1984-pursuant to the Housing act 1980-in consideration of £5.750.00-Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds--the Receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged by- HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL of Civic Centre Hartlepool-in the County of Cleveland (hereinafter called “the Transferor”) as beneficial owner hereby CONVEY to ALAN HARVEY FLOUNDERS & JACQUELINE FLOUNDERS-his-WIFE-both of 48-Ridlington Way-Hartlepool- aforesaid-(hereinafter called “the Transferee”) the Land-purchased- shown and edged in RED-on the title plan-number M44,684- dated –September 1983-bound-up-within-and with-the DWELLING-HOUSE-and Other Buildings-thereon known as Number 48 Ridlington Way-Hartlepool- the estate was -Conveyed, Transferred-Registered & Recorded in both the Property Register & the Proprietorship Register of the Land Title Register- by J Anthony Brown Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council-on behalf of the Sellers of the Freehold Property-on the 29th 3.1984-irrefutable -unchallengeable-documentary evidence of legal purchase & Ownership- BUT-completely ignored by Hartlepool Borough Council Planning and Legal Officials-What a copout- what intellectual cowardice, too: afraid to investigate allegations of Misconduct in public office- of Council Officials.
"This thing could not have occurred - without the Connivance and Collusion of Paid Officials in Hartlepool Borough Council and the Connivance and Collusion of Officials in the Land Registry Durham-

Tuesday, 14 June 2016

CORRUPTION & PERVERTING the COURSE OF JUSTICE-HARTLEPOOL STYLE


 

An explanation-WHY –I continue my Campaign- and WHY I have reported my Concerns to Cleveland Police-
 
PLEASE SHARE - remember just liking the post doesn't help spread it.

I don’t get a great deal of pleasure from exposing the Corruption in Hartlepool-but I believe it is necessary and in the public interest- when you discover some Councillors and Council officials not all I agree- are morally unfit to hold positions of authority in public office- they all get very well paid by the public to do a job- unfortunately-a few- start to believe their own publicity- they think they can do and say what they like- they even begin to think they are better than the average local- they also think they are above the law- they become big headed- supercilious –and arrogant- these scoundrels should be exposed- unfortunately some -Local authorities particularly Hartlepool-will in my opinion- always try and pass the buck but I think you will find that it is not possible when push comes to shove-particularly when you possess-as we do- the legal documents of Title- CE74844 “Absolute including the receipt for the purchase-of-the ex-council house-freehold-property- pursuant to the Housing Act 1980!  The best class of title to have is absolute.

This means that the proprietor’s right to the land is absolute and cannot be Challenged?-
 
I believe Peter Devlin Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council- should know the law-we are led to believe -he is -after all a Solicitor- particularly the Law regarding Purchase of Land & Property-sold by Hartlepool Borough Council-and bought by local citizens-consequently his silence- indicates-he is NOT taking my allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice & financial fraud-including abuse of Public Office-- by some of his Council Colleagues regarding our legal ownership of the registered freehold land and property-Title CE74844 “Absolute”- Seriously Enough - part of which was unlawfully given to our immediate next door neighbour-In my view- this Conduct in failing to pursue serious criminal offences reported to him-and I believe-Misconduct in a Public Office-Particularly his clear breach of  the Fraud Act 2006- Chapter 35-section 4-fraud by abuse of position-in which he is expected to Safeguard-or NOT act against-the financial interests of another person ? a breach of his standards professional behaviour in the areas of Honesty and Integrity-

Does he need to be reminded once again-that Hartlepool Borough Council- were the original sellers and mortgage holders-of the land and property that we originally purchased in all good faith from Hartlepool Borough Council in February 1984-Pursuant to the Housing Act 1980-in Consideration of Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds £5,759.00-the RECEIPT on the Land Registry-Official Copy- of the Document of Purchase.-is hereby acknowledged-by HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL-of the CIVIC CENTRE-HARTLEPOOL-
It was my understanding- has explained by our Solicitors-Levinson-Walker & Lister-that a Title Deed is a Legal Document by which Real Property is Owned, Sold and transferred-once the Land and Property is Purchased-Conveyed- transferred -recorded and registered by the Solicitor as was ours-by J Anthony Brown- Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council on the 29th /3/1984.with Land Registry- Durham- the Property Deed is Proof that the person named in it- owns the land described-edged in RED on the Deed Title Plan- and all of the buildings attached to it!  It was also my belief these entitlements are legally enforceable

This unfortunately does’nt appear to be the opinion of the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council-Peter Devlin- nor the Opinion of the LABOUR Member of Parliament – for Hartlepool- Iain Wright M.P. who was informed of the facts BUT remains SILENT- 
 
My continued research of the some Legal site on the Internet- has expose some interesting data-that I believe supports my allegation- that Alan H Smith-assistant Land Registrar-and Anthony- Lowes-both Officials -of Land Registry Durham- Colluded and Conspired -with Officials of Hartlepool Borough Council- namely--Alyson Carman-Solicitor and Complaints reviewer; Hilary Martin- Solicitor and Freedom of Information Officer- Richard Trow Project Planning Officer-Mr-Reece- Planning Development Manager-Paul Burgon-Enforcement Officer- to Pervert the Course of Justice-in Public Office- Particularly their  clear breach of  the Fraud Act 2006- Chapter 35-section 4-fraud by abuse of position-in which they-are- expected to Safeguard-or NOT act against-the financial interests of another person?
Here is Information readily available in the Public Domain-
Land Registry Proprietorship Register
 
The Land Registry’s register of land is made up of three sections, or registers, called the Property Register, Proprietorship Register and Charges Register. These three registers contain information as to the ownership of a particular piece of land, its extent, and any third party interests which affect it, such as mortgages, rights or covenants.

The proprietorship register tells us the legal owner(s) of the land and various other important pieces of information.  Proprietorship Register & Class of Title
 
1.       Firstly, the proprietorship register tells us the “class of title” which the land is registered with. There are six classes of title, three relating to freehold land and three to leasehold land. The freehold classes are absolute, qualified or possessory and the leasehold classes are absolute, good leasehold and qualified.

2.     The best class of title to have is absolute. This means that the proprietor’s right to the land is absolute and cannot be challenged.

3.      Possessory title is at the other end of the scale. This usually happens where the person who originally applied to register the land could not prove his ownership, either because he had lost the title deeds or he was claiming ownership through adverse possession (often termed “squatters’ rights”).

4.      Possessory title can be challenged by someone with a better claim to the land.

5.       
Next we have the name(s) of the Registered Proprietor(s). These are the legal owners of the land and except in exceptional circumstances (such as if a sole owner is bankrupt, the property has been repossessed or all owners are deceased) these are the people with power to transfer the property to a new owner.
There can be a maximum of four registered proprietors and a minimum of one. The date in brackets is the date on which the property was registered in the name of the current owners.
This will generally be several weeks after the date on which they actually completed their purchase.the Proprietorship Register may state the price paid by the current proprietors when they acquired the property. Any personal covenants; they are covenants which are only binding on the current proprietor, will be detailed here. The most common personal covenant found here is an indemnity covenant.The Proprietorship Register goes on to list any restrictions (entries which limit the way in which the proprietors can deal with the title) and bankruptcy notices.

If anything I have Written or Published is NOT TRUE why have NONE repeat NONE of the named Hartlepool Council Individuals Disputed any of my allegations-NOR Commenced ANY Legal Proceeding against ME for Slander-or whatever other crimes they can think of-?
If anyone named wishes to refute any of the allegations made against them-in a Court of law-they are of course-free to do so- indeed-I would welcome such action- I am led to believe from my internet research- a Council cannot sue for libel-(Derbyshire vs Sunday Times-House of Lords 1993) nor can it indemnify a Councillor or Council Officer who wished to sue an individual-(local authorities indemnity for members and officers) order 2004!
 If that is correct-they should be reminded-before deciding on such a Hazardous-Course of action-they will have to pay their own legal costs-and prove-in a Court of law-our Documents of purchase & Registration-to be fraudulent-? 10 years for Perjury- I think is the going rate at the moment!

Yours Sincerely
Alan Harvey Flounders

Tuesday, 14 June 2016

SUPRISE SUPRISE -IAIN WRIGHT, MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT FOR HARTLEPOOL -SENDS ME AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT -


Wednesday, 01 June 2016
Surprise Surprise- I -Have just received -would you believe an   acknowledgement –at last- from Iain Wright –M.P. for Hartlepool- to a recent critical letter I sent to him on Sunday 8th May-2016. In which he says the contents have been noted- that’s it- noted-
To avoid any further misunderstanding I wish-to publish the contents of my letter I sent to Iain Wright M.P.– on here to-day- and wait and  see if any action--is taken against me for telling the truth-and criticising his conduct- he has known about my allegations of misconduct by officials of both Land Registry Durham and Planning Officials of Hartlepool Borough Council-including the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council-Peter Devlin- for a number of years- and has done nothing- absolutely nothing-  both of these people- can never say- they didn't know who was the Legal owner of the Ex-Council House property
This letter was I believe both courteous and truthful-but like all the others I have sent -will be completely ignored-
Sunday 8th May 2016
Dear Sir,
Corruption –still festering away-in Hartlepool Labour Dominated Borough Council –

At last -the oxygen of publicity has put a spotlight on the Corruption--in Hartlepool Labour Dominated Borough Council –
 
Ask yourself this -How can a Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough
Council-Peter Devlin- despite having a copy of the legal conveyance and a copy of a receipt-from Hartlepool Borough Council- acknowledging- the price paid -Pursuant to the Housing Act-1980- in “Consideration of “Five Thousand Seven Hundred & Fifty Pounds-£5,750” for the ex-council house Land & Property- highlighted on the Title Plan in RED- is still trying-would you believe- to hide the fact that a number of his colleague-Richard Trow-Paul Burgon & Mr Reece- in the Hartlepool Council- Planning Department- & -Alyson Carman-& Hilary Martin- of the Legal- Departments –acted Dishonestly in Public Office- when Granting-a Certificate of Lawfulness & Retrospect Planning Permission to a Planning Applicant H/2009/0568 -knowing-as they were the original owners and Sellers of the Council House Property- the retrospective planning application contained fraudulent & misleading claims of Freehold Property Purchase &  ownership-
a Statutory Requirement- of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990- sections 65(5) & 65(6) for- part of a Kitchen Extension erected-without seeking- Hartlepool- council planning-permission- and attached-it-to the immediate neighboursPrivate -property-causing severe structural damage if that doesn’t STINK of CORRUPTION- and the FAVOURABLE and PREFERENTIAL Treatment Previously given to these Retrospective Planning applicants- then we are all going to HELL in a WHEEL-BARROW -

We want the public to know that this isn’t about money, I have already returned to Land Registry-London- the sum of £300.pounds awarded to us until this disgraceful theft of freehold property is rectified- the truth is we scrimped and saved to buy our 3 bedroomed ex- council house-and have no intension of allowing a few dishonest despicable un-elected Hartlepool Council Officials-& a few Government Officials employed at Land Registry-Durham- namely the assistant Land Registrar-  Alan H Smith- and Anthony Lowes- to conspire with the others particularly the Retrospective Planning applicant and Officials of Hartlepool Borough Council- to pervert the Course of Justice- to commit fraud-,in Public Office-& rob us of part of our legally purchased -Freehold Land & Property purchased in all good faith- on the 1st February 1984- pursuant to the Housing Act 1980 and in Consideration of “Five Thousand Seven Hundred And Fifty Pounds-£5,750.00”- registered-Land Title CE74844 “Absolute”
Yours Sincerely
Alan Harvey Flounders

My reference above to preferential treatment for example are these-
 
(a) to avoid the horrendous financial costs incurred by the Retrospective Planning applicants H/2009/0568 to demolish their illegal kitchen extension would have been astronomical-?

Does any level headed normal person still doubt that my allegations that the Retrospective Planning Applicant H/2009/0568 was again- shown Special Preferential and Privileged Treatment- don’t forget –they were allowed if not  encouraged to run and  operate a successful profit making taxi business from their Council House-strictly prohibited by their council house tenancy agreement and the covenants of the property- and what inducement other than money -you might well ask- was employed to receive that extra Special Treatment ? -

Just imagine- if some arrogant-I’ve got- more money than you-and have some-very-important-influential friends on Hartlepool  Council-so none of the planning rules or property laws apply to us- built- a un-safe- ugly monstrosity next door to you.-and attached to the rear wall of your detached outside wash-house-preventing your family the safe use of the -Wash House facilities-which- remember- you had  bought and paid-for-from Hartlepool Council in February 1984 !  Pursuant to the Housing Act 1980 in Consideration of Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds-£5,750.00.  
What do you do-about it-Do you lay down and accept it! –I don't think that would be your real honest- response, would it?

If anything I have Written or Published is NOT TRUE why have NONE repeat NONE of the named Hartlepool Council Individuals Disputed any of my allegations-NOR Commenced ANY Legal Proceeding against ME for Slander, or whatever other crimes they can think of-?
If anyone named wishes to refute any of the allegations made against them-in a Court of law-they are of course-free to do so- indeed-I would welcome such action-they should be reminded- they will have to pay the own legal costs-

Wednesday, 8 June 2016

DOES ANY ONE STILL THINK VOTING LABOUR-IN-HARTLEPOOL-IS A GOOD IDEA ?


Wednesday, 08 June 2016

I have been watching on T.V. as no doubt many thousands of other Hartlepool voters have- the amazing theatrical performance of our local M.P. Iain Wright- attempting to look intelligent when interrogating-Yesterday- Sports Direct  and Newcastle Football Club owner- Mike Ashley about the working conditions endured by his employees, No doubt- some of these allegations may possibly be found to be true- and-if so-I am convinced they will be rectified in the near future-what I personally find very difficult and distasteful-to understand-is how can this very insignificant Member of the Palace of Westminster- Iain Wright- be a member of the Business Committee let alone be the Chairman- he is-in my view-totally unfit to hold any Parliamentary Office-this is the man-it must be remembered- who has numerous other very serious local financial issues t0 address-here in Hartlepool-one court case in particular- involves–I believe- an ex-female Hartlepool labour councillor-accused of Financial misconduct- and includes - four employees –still awaiting to receive the compensation they were justifiably awarded by the court.

He must know- Hartlepool-Labour Party-Dominated-Borough Council-is totally Corrupt- even the Chief Solicitor- Peter Devlin- must be part of the band- he  has tried to hide and sweep under the carpet our Irrefutable evidence of the-Purchase in all good faith-of our Ex-Council House - Pursuant to the Housing Act 1980-in Consideration of “Five Thousand- Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds-£5,750.00.the Receipt-which we have- whereon is hereby acknowledged by J ANTHONY BROWN Chief Solicitor-of Hartlepool Borough Council- we also have the Mortgage redemption statement from the-chief Financial Officer- of Hartlepool Council- J.D. WALTON Confirming that the Land Certificate had been passed to Land Registry for DISCHARGE of the MORTGAGE –this Mortgage Redemption Statement is binding on the entity to whom it is issued, and stands as the lender's Hartlepool Borough Councils Official Word on the progress of the mortgage.
This legally means that once WE as the borrower have finished repaying the mortgage the property is ours and the lender -Hartlepool Borough Council-has no further claim on it.

The Chief Solicitor-of Hartlepool Borough Council- Peter Devlin-in refusing to answer my Reasonable and legitimate questions as we are entitled to do- as the legal registered Property owner- is doubting the veracity and integrity of J ANTHONY BROWN his predecessor- in the position- of Chief Solicitor-of Hartlepool Borough Council simply to allow his colleagues -Hilary Martin-Solicitor and F.O.I officer-Alyson Carman- Solicitor and Complaint Reviewer-in the Legal departments-and Richard Trow-Planning Officer- Paul Burgon- Enforcement Office and Mr Reece- Development Manager of the Planning departments-to flout the Law- and ride roughshod over the concerns of the legal property owners- simply to award Certificates of Lawfulness and Retrospective planning -to personal friends!  No surprises there then!

Iain Wright M.P. in NOT taking our complaints seriously- is now eligible-in my view-to apply for full membership of that-other exclusive group of new Labour Party  Scoundrels-consisting of Jack Straw-Tony Blair-Gordon Brown-and who can possibly forget- our-very own-previous member of Parliament for Hartlepool-Peter Mandelson-who after years of skulduggery-filling their own pockets- in Public Office- have all got one thing in common-they are all very wealth men- and without doubt- Premier League Liars-

We are long past you-can’t-do-that-or you can’t say that-. Have the balls to Stand up and tell the truth-if you are frightened of being sued- don’t play in the big boy’s school yard-

-BOB CROW-1961-2014- - love him or hate him- his quote-His words NOT - mine-I believe was spot on the money- and it fits all occasions-of life- and can never be challenged-be honest-isn’t what–BOB CROW-said-the TRUTH.

“If you fight you might lose-BUT if you don’t fight -you will always lose”-
Very sound and true advice

Please Note
If anything I have Written or Published is NOT TRUE why have NONE repeat NONE of the named Hartlepool Council Individuals Officials- Disputed any of my allegations-NOR Commenced ANY Legal Proceeding against ME for Slander, or whatever other crimes they can think of-?

If anyone named wishes to refute any of the allegations made against them-in a Court of law-they are of course-free to do so- indeed-I would welcome such action-they should be reminded- they will have to pay the own legal costs-and produce the documents of Purchase & Registration  of the Land and Property- to refute  our claims!

A deed is a formal written document that has force in law to alter the rights and duties of the parties to it. To be effective a deed has to be signed, sealed and delivered.
      When someone applies to Land Registry to register their title to a piece of land then they have to show at least some of the pre-registration title deeds to Land Registry to prove that they have title to that land-if you are going to Court in a litigation against your neighbour, and if your neighbour's case relies upon information contained in a title deed, then the law requires him to disclose that title deed to you (in fact, he is required to disclose to you any evidence on which he seeks to rely in his case against you). The right thereto shall be deemed absolute and indefeasible,

I am still awaiting a reply or an acknowledgement to the following e-mail I recently sent to Cleveland Police- as a law abiding full council tax payer- I will send a polite reminders.

Could you please advise me on the correct procedure- to follow- and clarify for me- the  following situation- having exhausted all the know avenues of complaint- available to me- without success -I wish to formally lodge an official complaint of criminal misconduct in Public Office involving– Alan H Smith –assistant Land Registrar- and Anthony Lowes-both officials of Land Registry Durham and Officials in Public Office of Hartlepool Borough Council-namely-Richard Trow-Planning Officer-Hilary Martin-Solicitor and F.O.I. officer-Alyson Carman- Solicitor and Complaint Reviewer-Paul Burgon- Enforcement Officer- my question is- do I submit my documentary evidence in person- requesting a full police investigation into my criminal allegation to Cleveland Police only-or am I obliged to send my documentary evidence in support of my allegation of misconduct and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice in Public Office concerning Officials of Land Registry –Durham Office-to Durham Police- “separately” -although they are closely linked-?  Thank you

Yours Sincerely

Alan Harvey Flounders

Thursday, 26 May 2016

Wide Spread Corruption in Land Registry Durham- and Hartlepool Borough Councils



QUESTIONS (WELL WORTHY OF AN ANSWER)
An update of my campaign to expose Wide Spread Corruption in both - Land Registry Durham- and Hartlepool Borough Councils and a polite reminder to my LABOUR Member of Parliament for Hartlepool-Iain Wright-who refuses to acknowledge my letters or take my allegations seriously-where have we heard this before- including the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council Peter Devlin-who knows the truth of my allegations- but remains silent!

Just a thought- is remaining silent when you know the truth- classed as aiding and abetting fraud –the internet is a wonderful way to seek knowledge-

Would you, like many an honest citizen, think that a crime may have been committed? Would you suppose that it could well have been a case of fraud? Or fraudulent deception -please read the interesting but idiotic written statement made by the head of land registry-Malcolm Dawson O.B.E. to Iain Wright-the Honourable Labour Member of Parliament for Hartlepool- and make up your own mind-is this another
A Classic case of Smoke and Mirrors

My understanding of Land Registry- Guidance Notes No.8 explaining the Land Registration Act 2002 is that Registered Title is “Guaranteed” by Government Legislation –I now find a little confusing –is this real or what! It certainly smells strongly of corruption-
The supposed investigation of my Serious Criminal Allegation by Malcolm Dawson O.B.E. Head of Land Registry was Requested by my M.P. Iain Wright, the Honourable Labour member of Parliament for Hartlepool to investigate my Complaints of serious Criminal Misconduct by some Land Registry Officials-namely- Richard Fearnley Land Registrar, Alan H Smith-Assistant Land Registrar, Malcolm Schofield- Office Manager, Anthony Lowes, official-Position Unknown! ALL-employed at Land Registry Durham-my allegations –-included –Misconduct in Public Office- Property Fraud-including attempting to pervert the course of justice by illegally altering the recorded details on our Registered Land Title Deeds-CE74844 “Absolute” Ex-Council House Freehold Land and Property-we had purchased in all good faith –on the 1st February 1984- from Hartlepool Borough Council- Pursuant to the Housing Act 1980-in Consideration of “Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds-£5,750.00- the Receipt –whereof-is hereby acknowledged-by Hartlepool Borough Council-hereinafter called the (Transferor) as beneficial owner hereby –(Convey)-to ALAN HARVEY FLOUNDERS-and-JACQUELINE FLOUNDERS-his-WIFE-the Land Shown-and –edged in –RED –on the Land Plan- No.M44,684-Title-“Sale of Council House”48 Ridlington Way-Hartlepool- The Title Plan –clearly shows –ALL- the Land and Property Purchased- including the Dwelling House and the Outbuildings –the entire estate –was “Conveyed” “Transferred” Recorded—and Registered-in both- the Property Register- and the Proprietorship  Register- at Land Registry Durham- by the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council -J.ANTHONY BROWN-on behalf of the “Sellers” of the Council House Land and Property-Hartlepool Borough Council on the 29.3.1984.

I personally find it very hard to accept Malcolm Dawson O.B.E. report of his internal investigation into my Serious Criminal allegations, in anyway- truthful-it is in my view- nothing other than a Complete Whitewash, an Un- Surprisingly Clumsy effort, to avoid exposing the truth -some might even say a staggering act of Criminal incompetence, most certainly it is without doubt-  a “hypocritical nonsense”,

Obviously my irrefutable  documentary evidence of  Purchase of the Property-  and the price paid to Hartlepool  Borough Council- of  “Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds-£5,750.00 for the Ex-Council House- Freehold -Land and Property in 1984- to  support my claim to be the victim of Criminal Fraud and Misconduct in Public Office-were “Not” Considered  a Serious enough –issue- to interest the Honourable Labour member of Parliament for Hartlepool Iain Wright, M.P. –who appeared to have accepted, accepted without Question, Malcolm Dawson’s O.B.E. explanation that he had conducted a thorough Internal investigation into my Serious Criminal allegations of Gross Misconduct in Public Office, by Officials employed in Land Registry, Durham, and found nothing wrong- and was satisfied that the “Original Survey Documents had been “Destroyed,” but the “Copy” of  the Unsigned  “Original” Survey Documents had “Survived” which said, Malcolm Dawson O.B.E. Could to be“ Considered” as an “Authentic Copy,” of the “Original” Survey Documents, ? unbelievable-
It is important to Note that, Malcolm Dawson O.B.E. did NOT claim that the Authentic Copy of the Original Survey Documents, that survived-  was an “Official Copy” of the entries in the Register of Title DU37533, and it most Certainly does “NOT” provide Proof of Property Purchase or Conveyance or a Recorded Record of the Transfer of Ownership of Any Freehold Land and Property, Claimed by Alan H Smith- assistant Land Registrar-  to have been Purchased  by the B141 applicant- in 1972 from Hartlepool Borough Council, (Eight years before the Law giving Council House Tenants the Right to Buy Council House Property was introduced in 1980) . and would “NOT” be accepted or admissible as Evidence of Purchase in a Court of Law, to the Same Extent, as a Time and Dated “Official Copy” of the “Original” Entries in the Register of Title-

I firmly believe our evidence of Property Ownership- proves the B141 claim to be absolutely spurious. Which clearly –in my view- establishes the suspicion that Alan H Smith an assistant Land Registrar a senior government official in public office of Land Registry- Durham- had colluded and conspired with the B141 applicant- and officials of Hartlepool Borough Council- particularly Richard Trow- planning officer and others -to gain  property by criminal deception- intending to pervert the course of justice- ownership of part of  registered property-CE74844 “Absolute”  on which the B141 applicant –had previously and unlawfully erected –without planning permission- -part of their kitchen extension-and attached it to the immediate neighbours property -causing severe structural criminal damage to private property ! –
      Malcolm Dawson M.B.E Head of Land Registry, Controversial-highly suspicious  written Statement to Iain Wright, the Honourable Labour member of Parliament for Hartlepool is in my Opinion a Deliberate Misleading Deceitful and Dishonest attempt by a Senior Official in a Government Public Office-Land Registry, to Deliberately Divert attention away from “All” my Criminal Allegations ,that Paid Public Officials in one of his own Government Departments are Guilty of Serious Criminal activities including conspiracy to  pervert the course of justice- including- “Fraud” in Public Office-  and is nothing more than a Desperate attempt to Muddy the Waters regarding  his Claim to have fully investigated my Allegations of Land and Property Fraud by Officials in Land Registry, Durham.
For Malcolm Dawson O.B.E. Head of Land Registry to even suggest or imply that this so called “Authentic Copy,” of the “Original” Destroyed Survey Documents, would be acceptable in a Court of Law as a Bono-Fide Legal Document as Proof of Property Purchase and Transfer from Hartlepool Borough Council, is absolutely ridiculous-absolute nonsense!
Unfortunately this written assurance by Malcolm Dawson M,B,E, that an Internal Investigation had been undertaken ,appeared to have been very quickly accepted, without question or any hesitation by Iain Wright, M.P. for Hartlepool- and it must therefore be assumed, in my view- that Iain Wright, Labour, M. P. for Hartlepool, accepted without any reservations, the truthfulness of Malcolm Dawson M.B.E. claim to have fully investigated my Serious allegations of Criminal Wrongdoing in Public Office, by Officials in his own Government Department Land Registry, Durham-
Iain Wright, M.P. for  Hartlepool-has “Never” indicated to me, “Nor” ever asked , to the best of my knowledge, to see this- evidence of a Authentic Copy” of the “Original” Survey Documents, which Claimed by Malcolm Dawson O.B.E .to have been “Destroyed”

I  don’t think it  would have been unreasonable- for Iain Wright, M.P. to have Requested Malcolm Dawson M.B.E. to produce and make available for “Examination” and “Validation” this contradictory and highly suspicious  evidence he undoubtedly claimed to have  discovered, in his internal investigation, which would have provided irrefutable substantial evidence, to seriously challenge all my previous  Serious Allegations of Corruption including Property Fraud and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice- by Officials of Land Registry, Durham,
 It must be Remembered that to accept this Statement from Malcolm Dawson O.B.E is to Cast Very Serious Doubts and Questions the Honesty and High Professional Standards and Financial Integrity which one would expect from “ALL” the Solicitors involved in the“Selling” and the “Buying” of this “Registered” Freehold Council House Property,CE74844 “Absolute” Purchased in all good faith- on the 1st February 1984- from Hartlepool Borough Council- pursuant to the Housing Act 1980- in Consideration of “Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds” £5,750.00.  Particularly Levinson Walker and Lister, Solicitors retained by the Buyers of the Freehold Property.
(a)
In addition to the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council, J Anthony Brown, who acts on behalf of the “Sellers” Hartlepool Borough Council, Conveyed, Transferred, Registered and Filed all the recorded Property details in Both the Property and Proprietorship Registers  at Land Registry Durham on the 29th March 1984,  
There is also an “Official Copy” of the Register of Title CE74844 “Absolute” issued by Land Registry Durham on the 10th October 2008 shows the entries in the Register of Title CE74844 “Absolute” on the 9th October 2008 at 10.55.27. Which Confirms & Validates the “Original” Property Registration with Land Registry Durham on the 29th March 1984,
Under s67 of the Land Registration Act 2002, this “Official Copy” which is admissible in evidence to the same extent as the “Original”
(b)
This Statement, from Malcolm Dawson O.B.E. must also seriously question the Honesty -Integrity and Professional Competence of the Chief Engineer and Senior Surveyor of Hartlepool Borough Council -B.R. Davies, B.Sc., who it is important to remember- was the Responsible Person even prior to 1972? for the Production of “All” Written Pre-Sale Land Title Property Surveys & Land Plans-  of Council House Freehold Land and Property, sold by Hartlepool Borough Council, including the Land and Freehold Property Survey Title Plan Number M 44,684-Sale of Council House 48 Ridlington Way-Hartlepool-dated September 1983,and was acting in his Official Capacity of Senior Surveyor on Behalf of the “Sellers” Hartlepool Borough Council, who it Must be Noted, Confirmed and Validated , in Writing that “All” the details including the Detached Outside Wash-House Buildings as Specifically Requested by the “Buyers” Solicitors Levinson Walker & Lister  Recorded on the Property Survey Number M 44,684 in September 1983 and on the Land Title Deeds CE 74844 “Absolute” were confirmed as “Correct”  
(c )
In addition it is very important to remember that the Solicitors Levinson Walker and Lister, Legally Representing and Acting on behalf of the “Buyers” of the Council House Freehold Land and Property, CE7488 “Absolute” in February 1984, accepted, Unreservedly in all Good Faith all the Bono-Fide Legal Documents of the Sale and Purchase of the Freehold Council House Land and Property, from J Anthony Brown, the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council,
If anyone was to Seriously accept Malcolm Dawson O.B.E Statement, it must also bring in to question the Honesty Integrity and the Legal Competence of the “Buyers” Solicitors, Levinson Walker and Lister, and Must also cast doubts on the Honesty & Integrity of “All” the “Original” Signatories Appended on the “Original” Land Title Deeds, CE 74844 “Absolute” Including the Lord Mayor of Hartlepool J. JONES, and the Chief Executive-Mr-ABRAHAMS- who were all involved in the “Selling” and “Buying” of Council House Property from Hartlepool Borough Council in 1984
All the “Ownership” details first Registered in the Register of Title CE74844 “Absolute” on the 29th March 1984 were “Confirmed” and “Validated” on the “Official Copy” of Title CE74844 “Absolute” showing all the “entries” recorded in the register of title CE74844 “Absolute” on the 9th October 2008 at 10.55.27 issued by Land Registry Durham, on the 10thOctober 2008,
The “Original” Land Title Deeds, CE74844 “Absolute” Purchased in all good faith- on the 1st February 1984- from Hartlepool Borough Council- pursuant to the Housing Act 1980- in Consideration of “Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds” £5,750.00. was conveyed- registered at Land Registry Durham, and the “Pre-Sale” of Council House Property “Title Plan No. 44684 was confirmed and validated as correct by J Jones, the Lord Mayor of Hartlepool, plus the following Senior Council Officials, the Chief Solicitor J Anthony Brown, the Chief Engineer and Senior Surveyor B.R. Davies, B.Sc. representing the “Sellers” of the Council Property and accepted as Correct by Levinson Walker and Lister Solicitors representing the “Buyers” of the Property
For Alan H Smith Assistant Land Registrar Durham- to support this B141 application to claim ownership- on the spurious drawing SP 78983-dated 1971-When both council houses were owned by Hartlepool Borough Council-and were occupied by two separate weekly rent paying tenants-and later  two (2) coloured Photograph of an Outside Toilet , is absolutely Unbelievable  and would clearly indicate to any law abiding individual that Alan H Smith assistant Land Register Durham, is without any doubt  either total incompetent of the Law or totally dishonest, masquerading as an Assistant Land Registrar without “Any” knowledge of the Land Registration Act 2002, or the Guidance Notes No 8 which very clearly explains and Clarifies the Registration Process which states a “Registered” title is “Guaranteed ”
Land and Property purchased and paid for by a Mortgage “Must” be a serious consideration ,by everyone who Purchased a Council House Property by a “Mortgage” what Freehold Estate was purchased and is it legally in our  ownership, I firmly believe –although not legally qualified- that the following  Officials of Land Registry, Durham,
Richard Fernley Land Registrar Alan H Smith, Assistant Land Registrar -Andrew Schofield,Office Manager, Anthony Lowes,Position Unknown should  be jointly held “vicariously liable” and are certainly Guilty of “Fraud” for allowing some of their employees to Fraudulently and therefore Illegally attempt to deprive us of Land and Property we legally purchased, in all good faith- on the 1st February 1984- from Hartlepool Borough Council- pursuant to the Housing Act 1980- in Consideration of “Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds” £5,750.00. Conveyed and Registered in the Register of Title on 29th March 1984.

To accept a B141 Application in “October 2008” as did  Alan H Smith  to alter the entries in the Register of Title CE74844 “Absolute” first registered some 24 years previously on 29th March 1984, is not only Highly Suspicious but contradicts the Land Registration Act ,see Public guidance Notes No 8- and for Alan H Smith, Assistant Land Registrar Durham, who  also later accepted- Two (2) Coloured Photographs of an Outside Toilet Door has greater proof of Land and Property “Ownership” than the original registered Land Title CE74844 “Absolute” is beyond belief and understanding to give credence to the fraudulent B141  documentation produced to falsely claim ownership of Land and Property “Must” be questioned and produced for examination-
Why are there No other documentary Proof of “Ownership“ NO entries whatsoever recorded in the register of title, DU37533, which was claimed to have been purchased from Hartlepool Borough Council and Conveyed to Land Registry Durham-in 1972.

These original documents were ALL Inspected and Closely Examined in our home on Monday-11th August 2008,
No Documentary evidence of purchase or proof of any description-was –produced to say or indicate that any part of the Registered Land and Property CE74844 “Absolute” was ever Purchased-from Hartlepool Borough Council in 1972. ? WHY –if they were “Genuine claims of purchase”
There are absolutely NO additional entries shown or described on the “Official Copy “of Title Plan No.M44684- dated September 1983-. by the Chief Engineer and Senior Surveyor B.R.Davies, B.Sc. of Hartlepool Borough Council and counter signed by the Mayor of Hartlepool Borough Council, J Jones and endorsed by N.S.Abrahams Chief Executive- stamped with the Hartlepool Town Seal.

The Title Plan No.M44684- Title –Sale of Council House- 48 Ridlington Way-Hartlepool- dated September 1983- clearly shows-ALL-the Land and property edged in RED- Purchased  & Transferred-from Hartlepool Borough Council on the 1stFebruary 1984- in Pursuant of the Housing Act 1980 in Consideration of Five Thousand Seven  Hundred and Seventy five Pounds £5,750.00 . HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL hereby conveys to ALAN HARVEY FLOUNDERS and JACQUELINE PFLOUNDERS his WIFE-the land shown and edged in RED on the above Title Plan-
ALL the above legal documents of Purchase & Registration of Land Title CE748844 “Absolute” are available for Examination-if required to further prove Confirm and Validate that WE are the Lawful owners of the Land and Property in dispute.
IT MUST BE REMEMBERED WE ARE THE VICTIMS SEEKING JUSTICE –
My Research Of Various Legal Sites On The Internet-Has Revealed Numerous Interesting Facts-On Land And Property Law-The Registration Act 1925-Law Of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions ) ACT  1989-My understanding of Land Registry-Guidance Notes No.8 explains the Land Registration Act 2002 in that Registered Title is “Guaranteed” by Government Legislation further more-it is also my understanding –“That Land Registry’s  ONLY Remit-is to Record- ALL The Information Conveyed To Them-By The Solicitors Acting On Behalf of the Sellers Or Buyers Of The Property-Land Registry Have No Legal Authority –to Alter ANY  of the Details Submitted  for Registration of ANY Land/Property Bought or Sold by Conveyancing/Solicitors-  could this be the real reason that Alan H Smith –assistant Land Registrar and his assistant Colleague-Anthony Lowes-where a little nervous in our presence at the Land Registry meeting in December 2008- see my Blog- https://alanflounders.blogspot.com. Or Google-the Coffin Dodger! To read more ?

Without Prejudice also found in: Medical, Financial, Acronyms, Wikipedia.-Without any loss or waiver of rights or privileges.
Yours Sincerely
Alan Harvey Flounders