Monday, 28 September 2015

STILL NO RESPONSE FROM PETER DEVLIN- CHIEF SOLICITOR-OF-HARTLEPOOL ?

IF THEY WON'T COMMUNICATE WITH US, WE HAVE TO GO PUBLIC LIKE THIS

 

JUST A THOUGHT- I BELIEVE HE’S PAINTED HIMSELF IN A CORNER- THER’S NO ESCAPE-THIS TIME-

 

HE HAS NO DEFENCE OR EVIDENCE-TO DISPIUTE - OUR CLAIM OF PURCHASE AND REGISTRATION-OF THE FREEHOLD PROPERTY-CE74844 “ABSOLUTE”-IN FEBRUARY 1984 . TRANSFERRED AND REGISTERED-BY- J ANTHONY BROWN-CHIEF SOLICITOR OF HARTLEPOOL COUNCIL-ON 29TH 3 1984.

HERE IS PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF THE UGLY –ILLEGAL-CARBUNCLE-OF THE KITCHEN EXTENSION-BUILT WITHOUT PLANNING PERMISSION- NOTE -THE COW-BOY -PLASTERING AND BRICKWORK IN THE TOP RIGHT HAND CORNER IT CAN BE CLEARLY SEEN- ATTACHED AND OVERLOOKING –OUR FREEHOLD PROPERTY-

 

CAUSING SEVERE LIFE THREATENING STRUCTURAL DAMAGE-BY DELIBERATELY -BLOCKING- OFF -THE GAS ESCAPE DUCTS- TO  STOP- THE UNINTERUPTED- FLOW- TO THE OUTSIDE ATMOSPHERE- OF ANY BUILD UP OF TOXIC AND EXPOSIVE GASSESS- FROM THE INTERNAL GAS HEATED HOT WATER BOILER-

HE NOW- DISPUTES-THE  VERACITY OF THE DETAILS- RECORDED-ON- THE  PRE-SALE LAND SURVEY- M44684- COMPILED BY THE CHIEF ENGINEER AND SENIOR LAND SURVEYOR-B.R. DAVIES-B.Sc.C.Eng.M.I.C.E. DATED SEPTEMBER 1983 ?

HE ALSO -QUESTIONS THE-HONESTY AND INTEGERTY OF HIS PREDESESOR -J ANTHONY BROWN-CHIEF SOLICITOR OF HARTLEPOOL COUNCIL-BACK STABBING OLD COLLEAGUES IS A SURE SIGN HE IS ABOUT TO THROUGH HIS TOYS OUT OF THE PRAM-AND SPIT OUT HIS DUMMY-

A CLAIM OF RIGHT IS A GENUINE BELIEF HELD BY A PERSON THAT THEY HAVE A BONA FIDE CLAIM OF RIGHT TO CERTAIN MONEY OR PROPERTY-'ABSOLUTE TITLE' TO A PROPERTY GIVES UNEQUIVOCAL RIGHT OF OWNERSHIP TO THE OWNER, AND CANNOT BE DISPUTED OR CHALLENGED BY ANYONE ELSE-

REMEMBER-HE’S –THE-CHIEF SOLICITOR OF HARTLEPOOL-WOULD YOU BELIEVE- BUT- HE EVIDENTILY DOES.NT KNOW- A PRE-SALE COUNCIL HOUSE CONTRACT-APPROVED BY HIS PREDECESSOR J ANTHONY JONES- ACCEPTED BY LEVINSON WALKER AND LISTER- SOLICITORS ON BEHALF OF THE BUYERS- IS LEGALLY BINDING ON BOTH PARTIES-

ASK YOURSELVES- HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN- HOW COULD THIS UGLY UNSAFE KITCHEN EXTENSION-BE APPROVED -GIVEN A CERTIFICATE OF LAWFULNESS AND  GRANTED-RETROSPECTIVE PLANNING APPROVAL-BY -RICHARD TROW-PROJECT PLANNING OFFICER-AND- MR.REECE- DEVELOPMEN CONTROL MANAGER –WITHOUT RECEIVING SOME INDUCEMENT- SOME-TYPE- OF REWARD- -BROWN ENVELOPES SPRING TO MIND- ABSOLUTELY -DISGRACEFUL ?

 

HOW MUCH EVIDENCE DO YOU NEED PETER DEVLIN

                             HOW MUCH EVIDENCE DO YOU NEED PETER DEVLIN

Photograph of the Carbuncle of a Kitchen Extension- Note the unsafe-ugly-Cow Boy Brickwork-brickwork in the top right hand corner- build without seeking planning permission from Hartlepool-Planning Authority- and illegally attached and overlooking- a neighbour’s freehold property- causing severe damage-but given a (Certificate of Lawfulness) by Richard Trow- Hartlepool Council’s Project Planning Officer- and Mr Reece- Development Control Manager despite our objections- and -

 (a) Breaching the Building Regulations-

 (b) Town and Country Planning Act-1990-erected on Freehold Property- NOT in the Retrospectives Planning applicants-legal Ownership-

“Ownership Certificates” are a Statutory Requirement of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990– sections 65(5) /65(6)-attempting to gain Pecuniary advantage by Deception- is also fraud under the Fraud Act 2006.

(c) Health and Safety Regulations- 1974- creating a life threatening –Confined space-when deliberately Blocking Off- the Gas Escape Ducts – positioned high in the rear wall of the wash-house building- to Vent to an Outside  atmosphere any built up of dangerous Gasses-including severe damage to the property-

(d) by allowing further work to continue- increasing the damage already done to the detached wash-house-by the illegal  building- now seeking retrospective approval-any further building work Should have Ceased-until urgent remedial work had started ?-

(e)The MOTIVE –why the Retrospective applicants-H/2009/0568-failed to originally apply to Hartlepool Planning authority for planning permission- was to save- MONEY- a deliberate-very simple-well thought out plan- deliberately intended to deceive the Hartlepool planning authorities-including ourselves--NO- Planning Application-means- NO- Neighbours –to be asked if they objected-

(f)Please - Remember- the Project Planning Officer- Richard Trow - had been- engaged by the retrospective planning applicants H/2009/0568-as their Draughtsman to supply the Drawings for their new kitchen extension-and-to ensure a (Certificate of Lawfulness) was obtained-including –ONE- for this monstrosity of an extension-Note the unsafe-ugly-Cow-Boy-Brickwork in the top right hand corner.

The motivation for committing such a devious deception- was- again quite simple- MONEY- it was-without doubt- much- CHEAPER- to have the Project Planning Officer- Richard Trow- in their pocket-to Guarantee a Certificate of Lawfulness-  than to have their- illegally erected- unsafe-Carbuncle of a kitchen extension- erected on private property- justifiably DEMOLISHED –which Would  and Should - have happened-if our objections- had been fully investigated or Discussed- which they were –NOT-by the Democratically elected- Hartlepool Planning Committee-

 

This-was a deliberate well thought out- ploy- by Richard Trow-who you -must -remember had been- engaged by the retrospective planning applicants H/2009/0568-as their draughtsman to supply the drawings for their new kitchen extension-and-to help them-with their retrospective planning application- to ensure and Guarantee-a (Certificate of Lawfulness) was obtained- ?

For Richard Trow-to achieve this devious- (Certificate of Lawfulness)-it was absolutely essential- to avoid at all costs the involvement of the Hartlepool Elected Planning Committee) - Who- on the irrefutable  evidence presented-would- have-rejected- the illegal Controversial Retrospective application H/2009/0568-resulting-in the astronomical financial Costs involved - to  DEMOLISH- the ugly- unsafe- Carbuncle of a Kitchen Extension

It should also be noted- that the Guidance notes -handed down by High Court Judge –Sir Thayne Forbes-sitting in the Queens Division-when dismissing the appeal- of Robert Fidler-pursuant-to s289-of the Town and Country Planning Act-1990-

-Guidance notes-for Local Council to follow BEFORE Granting a Certificate of Lawfulness to applicants Seeking Retrospective Planning Permission-were completely ignored – as were his notes on Retrospective Planning applicants -who had Previously & Deceitfully built Extensions without applying for Council planning- hoping to benefit from the four year rule-they  would-NOT-be- protected by the 4 year rule-if obtained by deception-?

Naturally- these guidance notes for councils to follow- were-quickly- and Contemptuously Dismissed by Richard Trow--project planning officer- and Mr Reece-Development Control Manager-as Irrelevant and unimportant-  NOT- Surprising when one Considers that these TWO (2)- Highly Paid- Hartlepool Council Officials- had NO repeat NO legal Qualifications-whatsoever, and did not wish to know-or-hear such Legal Guidance- notes Handed down by a High Court Judge –Sir Thayne Forbes-

Richard Trow-assisted by Mr Reece Development Control Manager- Criminally Conspired-Jointly-to sit in judgement on their OWN designed kitchen extension-to Grant a Certificate of Lawfulness –without any involvement of the planning committee-

This was a-Guaranteed- NO Loss Situation- for any dishonest-Council Planning Official –to be placed in- these two (2) despicable Council Officials- were allowed-to -sit and be Judge and Jury- on a legally flawed-unsafe- Retrospective Planning application- H/2009/0568- Designed by themselves–knowing- it was- unsafely-attached too-and overhanging- causing severe structural damage to a neighbour’s freehold property-and without any hesitation-they- gave it  a Certificate of Lawfulness-doesn’t that tell you something? 

This unsavoury despicable action by two highly paid council officials- in Public Office- is Unforgivable- they acted like-two (2) School Boys- alone in their Classroom- who-in the absence of a School teacher-saw the opportunity –to mark their own examination papers-naturally- they awarded themselves a very high score- their actions are –unforgivable--indefensible –a clear abuse of their positions of trust-in Public Office-

Planning Corruption is normal-in most towns-here in Hartlepool it is Endemic-  to prove my point- would you believe this outrageous decision- appears to be supported by no other-than Peter Devlin- the chief solicitor- of Hartlepool Borough Council- himself - ?

Read my Blog -http://alanflounders.blogspot.co.uk/ it’s all there

Wake Up Wake Up-Does anyone still think we have Democacy in Hartlepool.

My e-mail to Peter Devlin Chief Solicitor
From: alan harvey flounders [mail to:alanflounders@gmail.com] Sent: 10 September 2015 12:27 To: Peter Devlin Cc: Jo Slater

Subject: Misconduct of Council Officials Wednesday, 09 September 2015

Dear Peter,
Thank you for your prompt reply received yesterday, to my correspondence-informing you –the chief solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council-of my serious concerns- of criminal misconduct including the acquisition of property by theft or fraud, attempting to pervert the course of justice and abuse of trust in Public Office-by Hartlepool council officials.

To say that I am disappointed by your comments- would be an understatement- but your reply-was exactly what I expected-your reference that my criminal allegation had been previously investigated-is simply not entirely true-

It was an investigation that NEVER happened-I was refused copies of the planning applicants false documents- claiming ownership of part of our registered property CE74844 “Absolute”-by members of your Legal and Freedom of information team-Hilary Marin-F.O.I.officer and Alyson Carman-Solicitor/ Complaints Reviewer-who-was- without doubt-personally involvement in this organised conspiracy to defraud-by accepting-fraudulent and misleading-documents which I have proved- were false? a clear indication that they acted dishonourable in a Position of Trust in Public Office !

I honestly believe your statement-is totally without foundation- it is clearly meant to muddy the waters- another- red herring- you are obviously trying- to divert attention away from my very serious but true- allegations- an attempt to cover up the facts- you have deliberately avoided and totally failed to address -even one of my serious concerns- including-abuse of trust in Public office- property fraud-and attempting to pervert the course of justice- -allegations of criminality-that are well supported–with irrefutable legal documentary evidence-

May I remind you once again Mr.Devlin- we are the legally registered owners of the freehold land and property- Title-CE74844 “Absolute”- purchased in all good faith from Hartlepool Borough Council-in February 1984-

We paid- by Mortgage- a Considerable Sum of Money–to Hartlepool Borough Council-for this freehold property-therefore- we firmly and honestly believe we are legally justified and entitled to challenge and question the Motives -Behind-Hartlepool Borough Councils decision-in “Granting” the Legally flawed- certificate of lawfulness -to the Controversial retrospective planning application H/2009/0568-Gained by Criminal deceit-

It should also be remembered-this planning applicant has a long history of receiving- favourable and preferential treatment from officials in public office-an example would be-

(a) Being allowed to conduct a profit making-taxi-business while a weekly paying tenant of a Council House –strictly prohibited in Council House Tenancy agreements-

(b) Being allowed to purchase their council house accommodation in 1974- by special dispensation-when social housing was in short supply- by what special dispensation-if not by having the right influential friends- in positions of authority-

Our bundle of legal documents proves- beyond any reasonable doubt-(unless- Harlepool Borough Council were in the fraudulent habit-of selling the same parcel of land and Property- to numerous citizens ) We purchased-in all good faith-the ex-council house freehold property–CE74844 “Absolute”- from Hartlepool Borough Council in February 1984-and therefore it supports and confirms our allegations- that the retrospective planning application H/2009/0568- contained fraudulent claims of property ownership- ?

It is inconceivable that anyone is unable to see the discrepancies in the retrospective planning application H/2009/0568- we both could not have purchased the same piece of Freehold ex-council house property-from Hartlepool Borough Council- our documentary evidence-of purchase- in good faith-clearly it establishes and validates our allegation that Alyson Carman-Solicitor/ Complaints Reviewer-was- without doubt-personally involvement in this organised conspiracy to defraud- and abused her position of Trust in Public Office –when attempting- to pervert the course of justice-) simply-because- she- KNEW-beyond any reasonable doubt-that we were - the Lawful Registered Owners of the-ex-council house freehold property- purchased –in all good faith- from Hartlepool Borough Council-in February 1984-

Alyson Carman-Solicitor/ Complaints Reviewer- also KNEW-in December 2008- Months before the planning applicants-were Granted a “Certificate of Lawfulness”-that the retrospective planning applicants-were NOT-repeat-NOT- the Legal Owners of ANY-of the freehold land and property-already built on-causing structural damage to our property- a criminal offence- remember-

“Ownership Certificates” are a Statutory Requirement of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990– sections 65(5) /65(6)- what is your answer to that criminal offence- -Mr. Devlin.?

  (It should also be noted- as I previously stated- that Alyson Carman-Solicitor/ Complaints Reviewer- received from me-by hand- at her “Specific Request”- in December 2008/ an “Official Copy” of the register of Title-CE74844 ”Absolute” issued by Land Registry-Durham- on the 10th October 2008-

Which showed very clearly- the entries in the register of Title- on the 9th October 2008-at 10.55.27- (which under s67 of the Land Registration Act 2002 -is admissible in evidence to the same extent as Original”-) does’nt that indicate personal involvement - Mr Devlin ?

 No excuses can justify her- breach of trust !
What about the Nolan Principles in Public Office? let’s not forget-the fraud act 2006-and an- explanation-why- an “Official Copy” of the Title- CE74844 “Absolute” is NOT acceptable by Hartlepool Council- the Original “Sellers” of the ex-council- Land and Property ?   Will you now say- she never got it-?

Your support for your- other council colleagues-in “Granting” the legally flawed-“Certificate of Lawfulness” for the retrospective planning applicant-H/2009/0568!-clearly-indicates- you dispute- and doubt-the accuracy-of all property details-surveyed and recorded- on the “Pre-Sale”- Land Survey- No.M44684- Prepared by B.R. Davies-B.Sc.-C.Eng.-M.I.C.E.- Chief Engineer and Senior Surveyor of Hartlepool Borough Council- dated September 1983!

That’s a real stab in the back for a Professional Colleague- which- will most- certainly have –repercussions for everyone- who bought any- Ex-Council House Property from Hartlepool Council-under the “Right to Buy” Laws-1980 - are all their- Pre-Sale land surveys-and- registered property detains- suspected to contain false information- ?

This is not going away-Mr Devlin- you will be compelled- to answer –sooner or later? Simply because- you-have I honestly believe- effectively accused Hartlepool Borough Councils own Council House Selling team ! ( J Anthony Jones- B.R. Davies- ) of lying-when preparing the “Right to Buy- Pre-Sale Land Surveys)

You- have failed completely to supply- ANY - documentary evidence-acceptable -in any British- Court of law-- to Justify and Support your un-professional insinuations-doubting the Veracity of the “Pre-Sale”- Land Survey- No.M44684- Prepared by B.R. Davies-B.Sc.-C.Eng.-M.I.C.E.- Chief Engineer and Senior Surveyor of Hartlepool Borough Council- dated September 1983!

Is unforgivable –are you sure-you are in the right job- Mr .Devlin ? By doubting the Veracity of the “Pre-Sale”- Land Survey- No.M44684- Prepared by B.R. Davies-B.Sc.-C.Eng.-M.I.C.E.- Chief Engineer and Senior Surveyor of Hartlepool Borough Council- dated September 1983!

You clearly but undoubtedly-also-questioning- -the Honesty- Legal Integrity-and Professional Competence of your Predecessor-the chief solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council J Anthony Jones-who was-you must remember- the Principal Legal Official-Representing Hartlepool Borough Council- the “Sellers” of the ex-council house freehold property-who was Responsible for the conveyance transfer and recording the- registered title- CE74844 “Absolute” in the Land Register-on the
 29-3-1984 !

 He also accepted as true and accurate the “Pre-Sale”- Land Survey- No.M44684- Prepared by B.R. Davies- B.Sc.-C.Eng.-M.I.C.E.- Chief Engineer and Senior Surveyor of Hartlepool Borough Council- dated September 1983-


Mr Soloman Levinson- Senior Solicitor of-Law Firm- Levinson Walker and Lister- acting on behalf of us- the “Buyers” of the ex-council house freehold property- who also accepted as true and accurate the “Pre-Sale”- Land Survey- No.M44684- Prepared by B.R. Davies- B.Sc.-C.Eng.-M.I.C.E.- Chief Engineer and Senior Surveyor of Hartlepool Borough Council- dated September 1983- which you- Mr Devlin- obviously Dispute- without any documentary evidence- to support your –claim- is totally unacceptable-and unworthy of a Senior Council official.-the Present chief solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council-

Our Claim of Freehold Property Rights -the principles are as follows;-

1. The claim of right must be one that involves a belief as to the right of the property in the hands of another.

2. The claim must be genuinely -that is honestly held- the belief must be one of legal entitlement- to the property and not simply a moral entitlement-

3. A claim of right -is a genuine belief held by a person that they have a bona fide claim of right to certain property- we have the Original -Land Title Deeds -CE74844 "Absolute" Conveyed-(the legal process involved in "Buying" and Selling" of property-on behalf of the "Sellers" - Hartlepool Borough Council-Transferred-Registered-Recorded in the Land Register- Including both the "Property" and "Proprietorship Registers" at Land Registry-Durham- on 29/3/1984- by J Anthony Brown-the Chief Solicitor- on behalf of the "Sellers" of the Property-Hartlepool Borough Council-

There is NO disputing that-Mr Devlin ? Definition of Registered -Title Absolute-to a Property-that is free of any encumbrances or deficiencies- Absolute Title - Gives unequivocal right of "Ownership" to the Registered Owner-and- Cannot be Disputed or Challenged-by Anyone Else-this is opposed to Titles with Liens-attachments or judgments against them -Title "Absolute" is also known as a "Perfect Title".

Finally- Mr. Devlin- We view the theft of part of our freehold Land and Property –registered title CE74844 “Absolute” purchased-in all good faith-from Hartlepool Borough Council-in February 1984- more serious than you obviously do-

Nevertheless – I think it only fair- to inform your good self-that my formal complain to Cleveland Police-accusing you Peter Devlin- chief solicitor-Alyson Carman-Solicitor/ Complaints Reviewer- Hilary Marin-F.O.I. officer -Paul Burgon- enforcement officer-Mr Reece- Development Control Manager- of Property Fraud -abuse of trust and perverting the cause of justice in Public Office- is well advanced-

in addition- I intend to send - a copy of our all correspondence to the Home Secretary- the Ministry of Justice – the Law Society- European Convention of Human Rights-highlighting Hartlepool Councils-numerous- blatant breach of British Law- including Article 1 Protocol 1-of the European Convention on Human Right- and anyone else- who may be interested in Council Corruption- and our legitimate legal champagne- to have our stolen property- returned to us!

  If anyone named wishes to refute the allegations made against them-in a Court of law-they are of course-free to do so- indeed- I would welcome such action- they should be reminded- they will have to pay the own legal costs- Please Note, If anything I have Written or Published is NOT TRUE – why have NONE repeat NONE of the named Hartlepool Council Individuals Disputed any of my allegations-NOR Commenced ANY Legal Proceeding against ME for Slander-or whatever other crimes they can think of-

1. A Council Cannot Sue for Libel (Derby-shire vs Sunday Times House of Lords. 1993 )
2. A Council Cannot Indemnify a Councillor or Council Officer who wishes to Sue an Individual (Local authorities indemnity for Members and Officers ) order 2004

Could the reason possibly be-everything I have-Consistently-said- I can support with Documents to Prove-Categorically- my statements are TRUE-can I also remind them- they will have to use their OWN Money- and Take an Oath to tell the Truth in a Court of Law- PERJURY- and Perverting the Course of Justice-are very serious Criminal Offences !!!

STILL THINK VOTING LABOUR-IN- HARTLEPOOL- IS A GOOD IDEA

Wednesday, 26 August 2015

UPDATE of my statement posted- on F/B/on Tuesday 25th August 2015-and copied to Iain Wright.M.P.

Dear Chief Solicitor-PETER DEVLIN-in line with your letter of Censure to me - regarding contacting my elected- De Brus- Labour- Ward Councillors- in essence saying that any further Critical Comments -I wish to make to them- Should be submitted to YOU and NOT to my Elected  Labour Ward  Councillors – this is -I believe -an Un -Democratic-Unhealthy Situation-nevertheless- will you please forward to the De-Brus Labour Ward Councillors-particularly- ROB COOK- the following –up dated statement-on  Hartlepool Council Corruption- I maintain-that -Hartlepool Borough Council-it is absolutely riddled with corruption.

The present Hartlepool people’s representative in the Palace of Westminster- Iain Wright M.P. -is fully aware of my allegations of Conspiracy to defraud by the named Council Officials- Richard Trow Case Planning Officer and Mr Reece Development Control Manager, Who- Possessed NO Legal qualifications whatsoever-but were allowed and supported by the Freedom of Information Officer Hilary Martin - Solicitor and Complaint Reviewer- Alyson Carman and Paul Burgon- Enforcement Officer-

 to “Grant” the Retrospective Planning Application H/2009/0568 a Certificate of Lawfulness- All Knowing- that this particular-Retrospective planning application- H/2009/0568-was“Unlawful”and “legally flawed”-

it Contained- false claims to “Ownership” of part-of the Freehold Land and Property, Registered Title CE74844 “Absolute”- on which the Retrospective applicant -had already illegally built and attached-a kitchen extension onto.

“Ownership Certificates” are a statutory requirement of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990– sections 65(5) /65(6)-attempting to gain Pecuniary advantage by deception- is also fraud under the Fraud act 2006. fraud by

(a) abuse of position-in Public Office- in which he is expected to safeguard –or not to act-against-the financial interests of another person-

(b) intends, by means of abuse of that position-to cause a loss to another or expose another to a risk of loss!(c) obtaining property by deception—created by s15(1)of the Theft Act 1968

Our Claim of Freehold Property Rights -the principles are as follows;-
1.
The claim of right must be one that involves a belief as to the right of the property  in the hands of another.
2.
The claim must be genuinely -that is honestly held- the belief must be one of legal entitlement- to the property and not simply a moral entitlement-
3.
A claim of right -is a genuine belief  held by a person that they have a bona fide claim of right to certain  property-we have the Original -Land Title Deeds -CE74844 "Absolute" Conveyed-(the legal process involved in "Buying" and "Selling" property-on behalf of the "Sellers" of the Property- Hartlepool Borough Council-Transferred-Registered-Recorded in the Land Register-including both the "Property" and "Proprietorship Registers" at Land Registry-Durham- on 29/3/1984- by J Anthony Brown-the Chief Solicitor- on behalf of  the "Sellers" of the Property-Hartlepool Borough Council-

Definition of Registered -Title Absolute-to a Property-that is free of any encumbrances or deficiencies- Absolute Title - Gives unequivocal right of "Ownership" to the Registered Owner-and- Cannot be Disputed or Challenged-by Anyone Else-this is opposed to Titles with Liens-attachments or judgments against them -Title "Absolute" is also known as a "Perfect Title".

We believe we have Sufficient Legal Documentary Evidence of Purchase and Registered Ownership -to make a Formal Complaint to Cleveland Police and commence legal challenges of Fraud and attempting to pervert the Course of Justice

Anyone can clearly see -in the photographs –above--the Carbuncle of a kitchen extension originally built Without Planning Permission-attached too- and overlooking our Private Property- causing Structural Damage to that property-including–Blocking Off –the internal Toxic Gas Ventilation Ducts-positioned high in the rear wall of the outbuildings-by the original builder of the property- to ensure the safe uninterrupted flow to the outside atmosphere of any Toxic or Explosive Gas – from the Internal Hot Water Gas Boilers-a life threatening situation ! 

The Project Planning Officer- Richard Trow-  on his inspection- of our property- found it funny-  quite amusing in fact—particularly the 4 inch brass screws- protruding through the internal rear wall from our neighbours- kitchen Extention- which NOW forms a structural internal  part of the neighbours kitchen extension-  proving- if any further proof- was needed- that the kitchen extension built and attached to our  Property- was NOT repeat-was NOT- ever- in their “Ownership” –

the True Facts of “Ownership”  should have been  known to Hartlepool Council- has they were the Original  Lawful “Sellers” of the Ex-Council House Freehold Property-CE74844 “Absolute” –Conveyed- Transferred –Recorded and Registered with Land Registry-Durham- by the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Council- J.Anthony Brown – on the 29/3/1984.

A Dangerous life threatening situation-was also  discovered by ROB COOK after his visit to our home when canvassing for votes PRIOR to His Successful Election as the Labour Councillor for-the -DE-BRUS Ward in West-View –HIS-Spectacular Theatrical Performance- was outstanding-it had to be seen -for it to be fully appreciated-HIS-hand gestures-HIS- speech was of dramatic quality-intense-moving-and inspiring- worthy -in my humble opinion- of some theatrical reward- such as-being nominated for an OSCAR-such was the power of his delivery- “Who authorised that Horrible Carbuncle of a Kitchen Extension” it should be “Demolished”- “a Blot on the Landscape-”needless to say- both my wife and I –were delighted with his response- and immediately went and Voted for Him

Unfortunately-since his victorious election as a Labour Councillor- in the De-Brus Ward-  he has suffered a Severe Loss of Memory ( Known as Political Amnesia ) and his non action-  has revealed- to us-  that ROB COOK is a man of NO ethical principles-a Lying Scoundrel- an  Hyporcrit -an all-round-first class- Snake Oil Salesman- a First Class Gobshite -  a person most unworthy of being a Labour Party Councillor in Hartlepool- nevertheless, it established in the Memory of two (2) Previous Staunch  Labour Party Supporters- an  outrageous-but- unforgettable scene- of what  depths a Genuine Incompetent  would be Labour Politician & Compulsive Liar- would go to get votes!

I fully understand-the right to Freedom of speech- has never included the freedom to make an untrue insinuation regarding another person- to the detriment of their reputation.-If any of these named- Hartlepool Council Officials- Richard Trow Case Planning Officer and Mr Reece Development Control Manager- Hilary Martin-Freedom of Information Officer- Alyson Carman Solicitor and Complaints reviewer- -and Paul Burgon- Enforcement Officer-  De-Brus Labour- Ward Councillor ROB COOK- can Challenge or Disprove ANY statement made on this blog- http://alanflounders.blogspot.co.uk - then I would welcome them- to commence -legal action against me immediately-I will then be given the opportunity in open court- to expose- their corrupt fraudulent criminality-fire away bonny lad, fire away. The sooner the better- I have resolved to prove them guilty of wrong-doing in public office- I am completely innocent of any dishonesty- I did nothing wrong- but legally purchase- in all good faith – my ex council home from Hartlepool Council- in February 1984- and have irrefutable documentary evidence- as Proof of Purchase and Registered-Title-by the Chief Solicitor J Anthony Brown-on behalf of the “SELLERS” of the ex-Council House Freehold estate- Hartlepool Borough Council in February 1984-

My investigations of the Hartlepool Planning System has unearthed a very unhealthy and disturbing side of the present planning system- planning officers-can and are- bribed –there is no other way to describe their dishonest actions- they are allowed- even encouraged- by a Corrupt Labour Led Council –here in Hartlepool-for Planning Officers-in this case-Richard Trow-to sit in judgement on their OWN Planning projects-designed by themselves- to ensure–for a consideration of course- the planning or retrospective planning  application will be granted a certificate of lawfulness EVEN if the application is known to contain fraudulent “Ownership Certificates” as required  by the- Town and Country Planning Act 1990– sections 65(5) /65(6)- and therefore legally flawed-

Hartlepool Council as Employers have been responsible for the fraudulent misrepresentations of their employees since the mid-nineteenth century, under the decision of Barwick v English Joint Stock Bank.[76] This liability was extended in the early 20th century, to cover fraudulent actions which were not of benefit to the employer, a previous requirement.[77]  I honestly-believe- Hartlepool Council- can  be held vicariously liable for their employees in Public Office- the test for vicarious liability of fraud was whether it was within an employee's authority – either actual, or outwardly appearing –that Richard Trow-Planning Officer- and other Council Officials- to carry out the fraudulent actions that he did.[78]

Yours Sincerely -

Alan Harvey Flounders

Copies:- Iain Wright- M.P. for Hartlepool

I have been advised- rightly or wrongly- that Sending communication with the words “without prejudice” means that the communication and its contents cannot be used against the party making the statement in Court Proceedings. This protection is NOT restricted to communication between lawyers or between lawyers and their clients. Any party involved in a dispute that might result in litigation can communicate on a without prejudice basis.-having included that- I again repeat – that if ANY of the named Hartlepool Council or Land Registry Officials- wish to deny any of my allegations-which I refuse to withdraw- on the grounds that they are factual-and true-please- I repeat-please- challenge any of my statements- preferably in a court of law-