Alanflounders@gmail.com to Land Registry

Dear Sir or Madam,

May I remind you that after an internal investigation into my Allegations of Fraud and Misconduct in Public Office committed by Alan H Smith assistant Land Registrar and other Registry Officials employed at Durham, by the Complaints reviewer Mrs Derrington

I received an apology and was awarded £300.00!

which I refused to accept and returned it to Mr Joe Timothy of Land Registry London, as I believe we have sufficient evidence of Purchase to prove my Allegations of Fraud were NOT fully investigated.

I would be grateful if you would kindly provide me with a copy of that written legal authority which permits Alan H Smith assistant Land Registrar Durham and his Colleague Anthony Lowes to act, advise and represent our immediate next-door neighbours Mr and Mrs E Bennison in their absence at the meeting Held in the Offices of Land Registry Durham in December 2008 and  their failure to provide the Evidence they claimed to had had of their Purchase from Hartlepool Borough Council  in November1974

plus

·       I would be grateful if you would kindly provide me with a copy of that written legal authority that allows and permits Alan H Smith assistant Land Registrar Durham and his Colleague Anthony Lowes to alter any of the property details conveyed to Land Registry Durham for Registration by the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council J. Anthony Brown on behalf of the “Sellers” of the Land and Property and Levinson Walker and Lister, Solicitors acting on behalf of their Clients!

·       Finally, I would be grateful if you would kindly provide me with a copy of that written evidence of a previous purchase Categorically claimed to have been made by Alan H Smith the assistant Land Registrar Durham between our immediate next-door neighbours by Mr and Mrs E Bennison and the Mayor Aldermen and Burgees of Hartlepool on November the 3rd 1974!

·       I require a Copy of the written evidence of a previous purchase to enable me to legally Challenge in a Court of Law the authenticity of the Fraudulent Evidence of a Previous Purchase

·       Evidence which I believe was used by our Immediate next-door neighbours Mr and Mrs E Bennison to GAIN by Criminal Deception approval from Richard Trow the Hartlepool Project Planning Official acting WITHOUT   the approval of the Elected Hartlepool Planning authorities, for the illegal Planning application H/208/0467 later changed to Retrospective Planning Application H/209/0568

Government Departments like Land Registry

should be increasingly conscious of their reputation and their legal obligations, for providing safe and secure services to customers. Everyone should be entitled to rely on a Government Guarantee to a registered land title, the claim contained in the Land Registration Act 2002, highlighted in Guidance notes 8, stating a Registered Land Title is “Guaranteed” should be legally enforceable.

It is my Understanding According to the Land Registration Act 2002

That when Land Registry receive an objection, we will first consider whether or not the objection has any chance of success.

 If it cannot possibly succeed, whether on the facts or the law the REGISTRAR must give notice of the objection to the applicant and the application cannot be completed until the objection has been disposed of (section 73(5) of the Land Registration Act 2002)

The assistant Land REGESTRAR Durham, Alan H Smith, was satisfied that our objection to our immediate next-door neighbour’s Mr and Mrs E Bennison B141 application to alter some of the details recorded on our register land title CE74844 “Absolute was groundless, despite our overwhelming authenticated documentary evidence of purchase of the Ex-Council House Land and Property from Hartlepool Borough Council in al good faith on the 1^st February 1984 pursuant to the Housing Act 1980 in Consideration of £5,750.00 pounds. 
(Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds)

including the Letter from Land Registry Durham dated the 16^th February 1984

CONFIRMING the Purchase of the Land and Property Clearly Shown Edged in RED on the “Official Copy” of the Property Plan No.M44684 Title “Sale of Council House” dated September 1983.

If the Assistant Land REGISTRAR Alan H Smith was satisfied that our objection was groundless,

Despite our overwhelming authenticated documentary evidence of purchase of the Ex-Council House Land and Property 48 Ridlington Way Hartlepool  from Hartlepool Borough Council in all good faith on the 1^st February 1984

pursuant to the Housing Act 1980 in Consideration of £5,750.00 pounds.
 (Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds)

According to the Land Registration Act 2002), the registrar must give notice of the objection to the applicant and the application cannot be completed until the objection has been disposed of (section 73(5) of the Land Registration Act 2002) 

According to the Land Registration Act 2002

There are a number of ways in which the objection can be disposed of.

The parties may reach an agreement as to how the application is to proceed, the applicant may withdraw their application, or the objector may withdraw their objection.

If that does not happen, the registrar 

has no option but to refer the matter to the Land Registration division of the Property Chamber, First-tier Tribunal (the tribunal).

My dispute was NOT referred to the Land Registration division of the Property Chamber,

 First-tier Tribunal

I wonder  WHY-