Notes on Misconduct in Public Office

·         HI Diana-I to Remain disappointed with Land Registry – their total lack of Positive Responses to my Request for a Review of my Complaints of criminal misconduct by Officials in Public Office , particularly after Ms. Derringtons recommendations that I should be awarded the £300. 00 for mistakes made by Land Registry, Durham Office,(this sum of money I have rejected and returned to Land Registry as unacceptable ) for their disgraceful criminal Conduct and attempts by the assistant Land Registrar of Durham-Alan H Smith-   to Deprive me by Fraud- Malicious criminal  deception & Misconduct in Public Office-   of part of the freehold of Land and Property which we Legally Purchased in all good faith- from Hartlepool Borough Council, on the 1^st February 1984 under the right buy law -introduced by Margaret Thatcher as the Housing Act 1980- in consideration of £5,750.00-Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds- Transferred-Recorded and Registered with Land Registry by J Anthony Jones- Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council on the 29.3.1984.

·          Consequently, I was left with no alternative but to report this serious matter of criminal deception & Fraud in Public Office to a higher authority, Cleveland Police- & the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council-Peter Devlin to request a Criminal investigation into my allegations-unfortunately I am still awaiting an acknowledgement of my complaint of Financial Fraud and Misconduct n Public Office  from both Cleveland Police -& the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council-Peter Devlin.

 I have also implemented my Right to complain to the Commissioner under Section 50. Of the Code of Practice, issued by the Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs, who have also failed to answer my concerns- - their silence might be a clear indication to me that they are ALL involved in misconduct in Public Office!

Land Registry have previously stated that Schedule 4 of the Land Registry Act 2002 makes provision for alteration of the Register of Title to correct a mistake, having searched the Office of Public Sector Information and the Land Registry Act 2002 Schedule 4, on the Internet.

This section I believe requires an explanation or a comment from Land Registry. What in these circumstances constitutes a mistake - is it a failure by Land Registry to Record and Register something recorded on some other Title Deeds?

It is also- my Understanding that H.M. Land Registry, pays out Indemnity ONLY where there has been a mistake on the Register and a Registered Proprietor has suffered loss due to the mistake (Schedule 8. Land Registry Act 2002.)

Alan H Smith- the assistant Land Registrar Durham- categorically stated in his letter to me signed & dated 3rd December 2008-that a previous conveyance/Purchase of the property in dispute had been made between the MAYOR =ALDERMEN & BURGESSES of the Borough of HARTLEPOOL in NOVEMBER 1974! Which contradicts ALL the Irrefutable Documentary evidence of Purchase available and therefore can only be a  

A BLATANT LIE- unsupported by ANY credible evidence- to CONFIRM such an OUTRAGEOUS STATEMEN- My previous requests to my Last Local Labour Member of Parliament Iain Wright- to request a “Copy” of this fraudulent purchase document was also kicked into the long Grass?

Blue Badge Criteria!

Blue Badge Criteria!

Of course, it is not until you really need help when you are really disabled and start looking into the qualifying criteria that you realise how complicated and difficult it is to get any of those things that help you make life more bearable- not only do the Government but Local Council seem to deliberately go out of their way to hinder you at every turn-

 After years without any financial government help whatsoever-simply because I had a small private pension- in addition to my state pension- which I had paid into all my working life after leaving Galley’s Field School- at the age of 14! I was continually told by Government Officials in Public Office-I was not entitled to any financial help to replace my bathroom for instance with a walk-in shower Ect! Ect!

I discovered after reading an excellent article published by the “Which” magazine- on “Attendance Allowance” I discovered that if you have serious walking disabilities & other chronic health problems as I have-  and require assistance and over 65 years of age you can apply for attendance  allowance which is NOT Means Tested – I was absolutely delighted -& applied – simply because with my catalogue of medical issues-although well treated and monitored by the Excellent N.H.S. & the Visiting Nurse I feel sure that I'm never going to recover but hope to improve, at last - six months before my 85^th Birthday I was awarded Attendance Allowance at the higher rate-How's that for care in the Community   

P.S.

I Recently received from Hartlepool Borough Council a Letter telling me that my Blue Badge I currently hold will expire on the 5/10/2017.consequently I phoned Hartlepool Council yesterday morning Thursday 07^thSeptember 2017- I was told to apply on line to fill in application form-having Attendance allowance does NOT--entitle you to a disability blue badge?

Do this not confirm that both this Government and the Local Council who issue the Disability Blue Badges – try to make things as difficult as possible-?