Monday, 28 September 2015

STILL NO RESPONSE FROM PETER DEVLIN- CHIEF SOLICITOR-OF-HARTLEPOOL ?

IF THEY WON'T COMMUNICATE WITH US, WE HAVE TO GO PUBLIC LIKE THIS

 

JUST A THOUGHT- I BELIEVE HE’S PAINTED HIMSELF IN A CORNER- THER’S NO ESCAPE-THIS TIME-

 

HE HAS NO DEFENCE OR EVIDENCE-TO DISPIUTE - OUR CLAIM OF PURCHASE AND REGISTRATION-OF THE FREEHOLD PROPERTY-CE74844 “ABSOLUTE”-IN FEBRUARY 1984 . TRANSFERRED AND REGISTERED-BY- J ANTHONY BROWN-CHIEF SOLICITOR OF HARTLEPOOL COUNCIL-ON 29TH 3 1984.

HERE IS PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF THE UGLY –ILLEGAL-CARBUNCLE-OF THE KITCHEN EXTENSION-BUILT WITHOUT PLANNING PERMISSION- NOTE -THE COW-BOY -PLASTERING AND BRICKWORK IN THE TOP RIGHT HAND CORNER IT CAN BE CLEARLY SEEN- ATTACHED AND OVERLOOKING –OUR FREEHOLD PROPERTY-

 

CAUSING SEVERE LIFE THREATENING STRUCTURAL DAMAGE-BY DELIBERATELY -BLOCKING- OFF -THE GAS ESCAPE DUCTS- TO  STOP- THE UNINTERUPTED- FLOW- TO THE OUTSIDE ATMOSPHERE- OF ANY BUILD UP OF TOXIC AND EXPOSIVE GASSESS- FROM THE INTERNAL GAS HEATED HOT WATER BOILER-

HE NOW- DISPUTES-THE  VERACITY OF THE DETAILS- RECORDED-ON- THE  PRE-SALE LAND SURVEY- M44684- COMPILED BY THE CHIEF ENGINEER AND SENIOR LAND SURVEYOR-B.R. DAVIES-B.Sc.C.Eng.M.I.C.E. DATED SEPTEMBER 1983 ?

HE ALSO -QUESTIONS THE-HONESTY AND INTEGERTY OF HIS PREDESESOR -J ANTHONY BROWN-CHIEF SOLICITOR OF HARTLEPOOL COUNCIL-BACK STABBING OLD COLLEAGUES IS A SURE SIGN HE IS ABOUT TO THROUGH HIS TOYS OUT OF THE PRAM-AND SPIT OUT HIS DUMMY-

A CLAIM OF RIGHT IS A GENUINE BELIEF HELD BY A PERSON THAT THEY HAVE A BONA FIDE CLAIM OF RIGHT TO CERTAIN MONEY OR PROPERTY-'ABSOLUTE TITLE' TO A PROPERTY GIVES UNEQUIVOCAL RIGHT OF OWNERSHIP TO THE OWNER, AND CANNOT BE DISPUTED OR CHALLENGED BY ANYONE ELSE-

REMEMBER-HE’S –THE-CHIEF SOLICITOR OF HARTLEPOOL-WOULD YOU BELIEVE- BUT- HE EVIDENTILY DOES.NT KNOW- A PRE-SALE COUNCIL HOUSE CONTRACT-APPROVED BY HIS PREDECESSOR J ANTHONY JONES- ACCEPTED BY LEVINSON WALKER AND LISTER- SOLICITORS ON BEHALF OF THE BUYERS- IS LEGALLY BINDING ON BOTH PARTIES-

ASK YOURSELVES- HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN- HOW COULD THIS UGLY UNSAFE KITCHEN EXTENSION-BE APPROVED -GIVEN A CERTIFICATE OF LAWFULNESS AND  GRANTED-RETROSPECTIVE PLANNING APPROVAL-BY -RICHARD TROW-PROJECT PLANNING OFFICER-AND- MR.REECE- DEVELOPMEN CONTROL MANAGER –WITHOUT RECEIVING SOME INDUCEMENT- SOME-TYPE- OF REWARD- -BROWN ENVELOPES SPRING TO MIND- ABSOLUTELY -DISGRACEFUL ?

 

HOW MUCH EVIDENCE DO YOU NEED PETER DEVLIN

                             HOW MUCH EVIDENCE DO YOU NEED PETER DEVLIN

Photograph of the Carbuncle of a Kitchen Extension- Note the unsafe-ugly-Cow Boy Brickwork-brickwork in the top right hand corner- build without seeking planning permission from Hartlepool-Planning Authority- and illegally attached and overlooking- a neighbour’s freehold property- causing severe damage-but given a (Certificate of Lawfulness) by Richard Trow- Hartlepool Council’s Project Planning Officer- and Mr Reece- Development Control Manager despite our objections- and -

 (a) Breaching the Building Regulations-

 (b) Town and Country Planning Act-1990-erected on Freehold Property- NOT in the Retrospectives Planning applicants-legal Ownership-

“Ownership Certificates” are a Statutory Requirement of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990– sections 65(5) /65(6)-attempting to gain Pecuniary advantage by Deception- is also fraud under the Fraud Act 2006.

(c) Health and Safety Regulations- 1974- creating a life threatening –Confined space-when deliberately Blocking Off- the Gas Escape Ducts – positioned high in the rear wall of the wash-house building- to Vent to an Outside  atmosphere any built up of dangerous Gasses-including severe damage to the property-

(d) by allowing further work to continue- increasing the damage already done to the detached wash-house-by the illegal  building- now seeking retrospective approval-any further building work Should have Ceased-until urgent remedial work had started ?-

(e)The MOTIVE –why the Retrospective applicants-H/2009/0568-failed to originally apply to Hartlepool Planning authority for planning permission- was to save- MONEY- a deliberate-very simple-well thought out plan- deliberately intended to deceive the Hartlepool planning authorities-including ourselves--NO- Planning Application-means- NO- Neighbours –to be asked if they objected-

(f)Please - Remember- the Project Planning Officer- Richard Trow - had been- engaged by the retrospective planning applicants H/2009/0568-as their Draughtsman to supply the Drawings for their new kitchen extension-and-to ensure a (Certificate of Lawfulness) was obtained-including –ONE- for this monstrosity of an extension-Note the unsafe-ugly-Cow-Boy-Brickwork in the top right hand corner.

The motivation for committing such a devious deception- was- again quite simple- MONEY- it was-without doubt- much- CHEAPER- to have the Project Planning Officer- Richard Trow- in their pocket-to Guarantee a Certificate of Lawfulness-  than to have their- illegally erected- unsafe-Carbuncle of a kitchen extension- erected on private property- justifiably DEMOLISHED –which Would  and Should - have happened-if our objections- had been fully investigated or Discussed- which they were –NOT-by the Democratically elected- Hartlepool Planning Committee-

 

This-was a deliberate well thought out- ploy- by Richard Trow-who you -must -remember had been- engaged by the retrospective planning applicants H/2009/0568-as their draughtsman to supply the drawings for their new kitchen extension-and-to help them-with their retrospective planning application- to ensure and Guarantee-a (Certificate of Lawfulness) was obtained- ?

For Richard Trow-to achieve this devious- (Certificate of Lawfulness)-it was absolutely essential- to avoid at all costs the involvement of the Hartlepool Elected Planning Committee) - Who- on the irrefutable  evidence presented-would- have-rejected- the illegal Controversial Retrospective application H/2009/0568-resulting-in the astronomical financial Costs involved - to  DEMOLISH- the ugly- unsafe- Carbuncle of a Kitchen Extension

It should also be noted- that the Guidance notes -handed down by High Court Judge –Sir Thayne Forbes-sitting in the Queens Division-when dismissing the appeal- of Robert Fidler-pursuant-to s289-of the Town and Country Planning Act-1990-

-Guidance notes-for Local Council to follow BEFORE Granting a Certificate of Lawfulness to applicants Seeking Retrospective Planning Permission-were completely ignored – as were his notes on Retrospective Planning applicants -who had Previously & Deceitfully built Extensions without applying for Council planning- hoping to benefit from the four year rule-they  would-NOT-be- protected by the 4 year rule-if obtained by deception-?

Naturally- these guidance notes for councils to follow- were-quickly- and Contemptuously Dismissed by Richard Trow--project planning officer- and Mr Reece-Development Control Manager-as Irrelevant and unimportant-  NOT- Surprising when one Considers that these TWO (2)- Highly Paid- Hartlepool Council Officials- had NO repeat NO legal Qualifications-whatsoever, and did not wish to know-or-hear such Legal Guidance- notes Handed down by a High Court Judge –Sir Thayne Forbes-

Richard Trow-assisted by Mr Reece Development Control Manager- Criminally Conspired-Jointly-to sit in judgement on their OWN designed kitchen extension-to Grant a Certificate of Lawfulness –without any involvement of the planning committee-

This was a-Guaranteed- NO Loss Situation- for any dishonest-Council Planning Official –to be placed in- these two (2) despicable Council Officials- were allowed-to -sit and be Judge and Jury- on a legally flawed-unsafe- Retrospective Planning application- H/2009/0568- Designed by themselves–knowing- it was- unsafely-attached too-and overhanging- causing severe structural damage to a neighbour’s freehold property-and without any hesitation-they- gave it  a Certificate of Lawfulness-doesn’t that tell you something? 

This unsavoury despicable action by two highly paid council officials- in Public Office- is Unforgivable- they acted like-two (2) School Boys- alone in their Classroom- who-in the absence of a School teacher-saw the opportunity –to mark their own examination papers-naturally- they awarded themselves a very high score- their actions are –unforgivable--indefensible –a clear abuse of their positions of trust-in Public Office-

Planning Corruption is normal-in most towns-here in Hartlepool it is Endemic-  to prove my point- would you believe this outrageous decision- appears to be supported by no other-than Peter Devlin- the chief solicitor- of Hartlepool Borough Council- himself - ?

Read my Blog -http://alanflounders.blogspot.co.uk/ it’s all there

Wake Up Wake Up-Does anyone still think we have Democacy in Hartlepool.

My e-mail to Peter Devlin Chief Solicitor
From: alan harvey flounders [mail to:alanflounders@gmail.com] Sent: 10 September 2015 12:27 To: Peter Devlin Cc: Jo Slater

Subject: Misconduct of Council Officials Wednesday, 09 September 2015

Dear Peter,
Thank you for your prompt reply received yesterday, to my correspondence-informing you –the chief solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council-of my serious concerns- of criminal misconduct including the acquisition of property by theft or fraud, attempting to pervert the course of justice and abuse of trust in Public Office-by Hartlepool council officials.

To say that I am disappointed by your comments- would be an understatement- but your reply-was exactly what I expected-your reference that my criminal allegation had been previously investigated-is simply not entirely true-

It was an investigation that NEVER happened-I was refused copies of the planning applicants false documents- claiming ownership of part of our registered property CE74844 “Absolute”-by members of your Legal and Freedom of information team-Hilary Marin-F.O.I.officer and Alyson Carman-Solicitor/ Complaints Reviewer-who-was- without doubt-personally involvement in this organised conspiracy to defraud-by accepting-fraudulent and misleading-documents which I have proved- were false? a clear indication that they acted dishonourable in a Position of Trust in Public Office !

I honestly believe your statement-is totally without foundation- it is clearly meant to muddy the waters- another- red herring- you are obviously trying- to divert attention away from my very serious but true- allegations- an attempt to cover up the facts- you have deliberately avoided and totally failed to address -even one of my serious concerns- including-abuse of trust in Public office- property fraud-and attempting to pervert the course of justice- -allegations of criminality-that are well supported–with irrefutable legal documentary evidence-

May I remind you once again Mr.Devlin- we are the legally registered owners of the freehold land and property- Title-CE74844 “Absolute”- purchased in all good faith from Hartlepool Borough Council-in February 1984-

We paid- by Mortgage- a Considerable Sum of Money–to Hartlepool Borough Council-for this freehold property-therefore- we firmly and honestly believe we are legally justified and entitled to challenge and question the Motives -Behind-Hartlepool Borough Councils decision-in “Granting” the Legally flawed- certificate of lawfulness -to the Controversial retrospective planning application H/2009/0568-Gained by Criminal deceit-

It should also be remembered-this planning applicant has a long history of receiving- favourable and preferential treatment from officials in public office-an example would be-

(a) Being allowed to conduct a profit making-taxi-business while a weekly paying tenant of a Council House –strictly prohibited in Council House Tenancy agreements-

(b) Being allowed to purchase their council house accommodation in 1974- by special dispensation-when social housing was in short supply- by what special dispensation-if not by having the right influential friends- in positions of authority-

Our bundle of legal documents proves- beyond any reasonable doubt-(unless- Harlepool Borough Council were in the fraudulent habit-of selling the same parcel of land and Property- to numerous citizens ) We purchased-in all good faith-the ex-council house freehold property–CE74844 “Absolute”- from Hartlepool Borough Council in February 1984-and therefore it supports and confirms our allegations- that the retrospective planning application H/2009/0568- contained fraudulent claims of property ownership- ?

It is inconceivable that anyone is unable to see the discrepancies in the retrospective planning application H/2009/0568- we both could not have purchased the same piece of Freehold ex-council house property-from Hartlepool Borough Council- our documentary evidence-of purchase- in good faith-clearly it establishes and validates our allegation that Alyson Carman-Solicitor/ Complaints Reviewer-was- without doubt-personally involvement in this organised conspiracy to defraud- and abused her position of Trust in Public Office –when attempting- to pervert the course of justice-) simply-because- she- KNEW-beyond any reasonable doubt-that we were - the Lawful Registered Owners of the-ex-council house freehold property- purchased –in all good faith- from Hartlepool Borough Council-in February 1984-

Alyson Carman-Solicitor/ Complaints Reviewer- also KNEW-in December 2008- Months before the planning applicants-were Granted a “Certificate of Lawfulness”-that the retrospective planning applicants-were NOT-repeat-NOT- the Legal Owners of ANY-of the freehold land and property-already built on-causing structural damage to our property- a criminal offence- remember-

“Ownership Certificates” are a Statutory Requirement of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990– sections 65(5) /65(6)- what is your answer to that criminal offence- -Mr. Devlin.?

  (It should also be noted- as I previously stated- that Alyson Carman-Solicitor/ Complaints Reviewer- received from me-by hand- at her “Specific Request”- in December 2008/ an “Official Copy” of the register of Title-CE74844 ”Absolute” issued by Land Registry-Durham- on the 10th October 2008-

Which showed very clearly- the entries in the register of Title- on the 9th October 2008-at 10.55.27- (which under s67 of the Land Registration Act 2002 -is admissible in evidence to the same extent as Original”-) does’nt that indicate personal involvement - Mr Devlin ?

 No excuses can justify her- breach of trust !
What about the Nolan Principles in Public Office? let’s not forget-the fraud act 2006-and an- explanation-why- an “Official Copy” of the Title- CE74844 “Absolute” is NOT acceptable by Hartlepool Council- the Original “Sellers” of the ex-council- Land and Property ?   Will you now say- she never got it-?

Your support for your- other council colleagues-in “Granting” the legally flawed-“Certificate of Lawfulness” for the retrospective planning applicant-H/2009/0568!-clearly-indicates- you dispute- and doubt-the accuracy-of all property details-surveyed and recorded- on the “Pre-Sale”- Land Survey- No.M44684- Prepared by B.R. Davies-B.Sc.-C.Eng.-M.I.C.E.- Chief Engineer and Senior Surveyor of Hartlepool Borough Council- dated September 1983!

That’s a real stab in the back for a Professional Colleague- which- will most- certainly have –repercussions for everyone- who bought any- Ex-Council House Property from Hartlepool Council-under the “Right to Buy” Laws-1980 - are all their- Pre-Sale land surveys-and- registered property detains- suspected to contain false information- ?

This is not going away-Mr Devlin- you will be compelled- to answer –sooner or later? Simply because- you-have I honestly believe- effectively accused Hartlepool Borough Councils own Council House Selling team ! ( J Anthony Jones- B.R. Davies- ) of lying-when preparing the “Right to Buy- Pre-Sale Land Surveys)

You- have failed completely to supply- ANY - documentary evidence-acceptable -in any British- Court of law-- to Justify and Support your un-professional insinuations-doubting the Veracity of the “Pre-Sale”- Land Survey- No.M44684- Prepared by B.R. Davies-B.Sc.-C.Eng.-M.I.C.E.- Chief Engineer and Senior Surveyor of Hartlepool Borough Council- dated September 1983!

Is unforgivable –are you sure-you are in the right job- Mr .Devlin ? By doubting the Veracity of the “Pre-Sale”- Land Survey- No.M44684- Prepared by B.R. Davies-B.Sc.-C.Eng.-M.I.C.E.- Chief Engineer and Senior Surveyor of Hartlepool Borough Council- dated September 1983!

You clearly but undoubtedly-also-questioning- -the Honesty- Legal Integrity-and Professional Competence of your Predecessor-the chief solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council J Anthony Jones-who was-you must remember- the Principal Legal Official-Representing Hartlepool Borough Council- the “Sellers” of the ex-council house freehold property-who was Responsible for the conveyance transfer and recording the- registered title- CE74844 “Absolute” in the Land Register-on the
 29-3-1984 !

 He also accepted as true and accurate the “Pre-Sale”- Land Survey- No.M44684- Prepared by B.R. Davies- B.Sc.-C.Eng.-M.I.C.E.- Chief Engineer and Senior Surveyor of Hartlepool Borough Council- dated September 1983-


Mr Soloman Levinson- Senior Solicitor of-Law Firm- Levinson Walker and Lister- acting on behalf of us- the “Buyers” of the ex-council house freehold property- who also accepted as true and accurate the “Pre-Sale”- Land Survey- No.M44684- Prepared by B.R. Davies- B.Sc.-C.Eng.-M.I.C.E.- Chief Engineer and Senior Surveyor of Hartlepool Borough Council- dated September 1983- which you- Mr Devlin- obviously Dispute- without any documentary evidence- to support your –claim- is totally unacceptable-and unworthy of a Senior Council official.-the Present chief solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council-

Our Claim of Freehold Property Rights -the principles are as follows;-

1. The claim of right must be one that involves a belief as to the right of the property in the hands of another.

2. The claim must be genuinely -that is honestly held- the belief must be one of legal entitlement- to the property and not simply a moral entitlement-

3. A claim of right -is a genuine belief held by a person that they have a bona fide claim of right to certain property- we have the Original -Land Title Deeds -CE74844 "Absolute" Conveyed-(the legal process involved in "Buying" and Selling" of property-on behalf of the "Sellers" - Hartlepool Borough Council-Transferred-Registered-Recorded in the Land Register- Including both the "Property" and "Proprietorship Registers" at Land Registry-Durham- on 29/3/1984- by J Anthony Brown-the Chief Solicitor- on behalf of the "Sellers" of the Property-Hartlepool Borough Council-

There is NO disputing that-Mr Devlin ? Definition of Registered -Title Absolute-to a Property-that is free of any encumbrances or deficiencies- Absolute Title - Gives unequivocal right of "Ownership" to the Registered Owner-and- Cannot be Disputed or Challenged-by Anyone Else-this is opposed to Titles with Liens-attachments or judgments against them -Title "Absolute" is also known as a "Perfect Title".

Finally- Mr. Devlin- We view the theft of part of our freehold Land and Property –registered title CE74844 “Absolute” purchased-in all good faith-from Hartlepool Borough Council-in February 1984- more serious than you obviously do-

Nevertheless – I think it only fair- to inform your good self-that my formal complain to Cleveland Police-accusing you Peter Devlin- chief solicitor-Alyson Carman-Solicitor/ Complaints Reviewer- Hilary Marin-F.O.I. officer -Paul Burgon- enforcement officer-Mr Reece- Development Control Manager- of Property Fraud -abuse of trust and perverting the cause of justice in Public Office- is well advanced-

in addition- I intend to send - a copy of our all correspondence to the Home Secretary- the Ministry of Justice – the Law Society- European Convention of Human Rights-highlighting Hartlepool Councils-numerous- blatant breach of British Law- including Article 1 Protocol 1-of the European Convention on Human Right- and anyone else- who may be interested in Council Corruption- and our legitimate legal champagne- to have our stolen property- returned to us!

  If anyone named wishes to refute the allegations made against them-in a Court of law-they are of course-free to do so- indeed- I would welcome such action- they should be reminded- they will have to pay the own legal costs- Please Note, If anything I have Written or Published is NOT TRUE – why have NONE repeat NONE of the named Hartlepool Council Individuals Disputed any of my allegations-NOR Commenced ANY Legal Proceeding against ME for Slander-or whatever other crimes they can think of-

1. A Council Cannot Sue for Libel (Derby-shire vs Sunday Times House of Lords. 1993 )
2. A Council Cannot Indemnify a Councillor or Council Officer who wishes to Sue an Individual (Local authorities indemnity for Members and Officers ) order 2004

Could the reason possibly be-everything I have-Consistently-said- I can support with Documents to Prove-Categorically- my statements are TRUE-can I also remind them- they will have to use their OWN Money- and Take an Oath to tell the Truth in a Court of Law- PERJURY- and Perverting the Course of Justice-are very serious Criminal Offences !!!