MY MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT -IAIN WRIGHT M.P. AS REPLIED AT LAST TO MY LETTER

 

Wednesday 17^th November 2014

Would anyone believe  that after two (2) polite reminders -I today received a reply from Iain Wright M.P. Labour Member of Parliament for Hartlepool  to a  letter I originally wrote on Wednesday 23^rd July 2014 and  sent to  him on Thursday 24^th July 2014, some four (4) months- (12 repeat 12 weeks ago ) Unbelievable –but true- from my own past personal experience , receiving an answer to a letter containing any form of polite but  critical comments sent to my  Labour Member of Parliament for Hartlepool is in its self a rare event, it should also be noted he NEVER answers or attempts to address any critical comments, he just buries his head in the sand and hopes you will go away- naturally I have sent an acknowledgement back to Iain Wright Labour M.P Hartlepool with an explanation that unfortunately at the moment I am bedridden and rather unwell with a severe case of flu- being an octogenarian even  a minor cold  can make you ill, I will a reply to his belated letter later.

Therefore –I think it’s only fair to anyone who may be interested in my criminal allegations to read and digest the contents of my original letter which has taken the honourable gentleman some four (4) months to answer?

Iain Wright M.P. Member of Parliament for Hartlepool

Wednesday 23^rd July 2014

Dear Sir,

I thank you for your latest letter-  Unfortunately my reply is somewhat delayed due to  illness and computer problems your letter contains a number of contradictions and omissions from your previous correspondence – and leaves me a little confused-consequently- I have re-checked and re read your last letters to me, in which you clearly stated that you had written to Ed Lester Head of Land Registry London and had attached my letter containing a list of my serious criminal allegations of Fraud and criminal misconduct committed by Alan H Smith assistant Land Registrar, Andrew Schofield Land Registrar and others all paid employees of Land Registry Durham,

It is my Understanding from your letter,  that you have now received a reply to the originally letter you sent to Ed Lester Head of Land Registry London on my behalf-from F.V. Clough a senior lawyer of Land Registry Durham,

Am I to assume that Ed Lester Head of Land Registry London as no intension of replying to your letter personally and in addition has no wish to be involved or answer these Very Serious and Unsavoury Criminal Allegations, and by delegating his obligations and responsibilities to F.V. Clough intends to avoid at all costs being accused or criticised in the future of failure to take those reported criminal activities seriously.

I am an Honest Tax Paying British Citizen and an innocent VICTIM of this Conspiracy by Officials of Land Registry and Hartlepool Borough Council- to Defraud-me of part of the Freehold Land and Property CE74844 “Absolute” I purchased in all good faith from Hartlepool Borough Council in February 1984.

I believe I am fully justified and entitled to voice these Critical Concerns to you, I feel confident that you will fully understand my motives and  fully share my disgust by the lack of Interest shown by Land Registry- to address these Criminal allegations of Criminal misconduct by their own employees.
 

May I remind you, that your previous good intentions to bring my Criminal allegations to the attention of the Previous Head of Land Registry, Malcolm Dawson O.B.E was also  a Complete and utter Disaster-a complete waste of time- he deliberately and deceitfully misinformed and mislead you a Honourable Member of Parliament-  when he Claimed that  he had investigated my allegation of criminality- and found NO  evidence of Misconduct by any Official employed at Land Registry Durham despite the overwhelming irrefutable documentary evidence available for his examination--a ludicrous outrageous decision- a clear wilful and deceitful attempt to Pervert the Course of Justice and  a clear indication that he Malcolm Dawson O.B.E. would also have  accepted as Greater Proof of  evidence of Property Ownership -as did Alan H Smith assistant Land Registrar.

The Two (2) Coloured Photographs of an Outside Toilet- one Photograph showing the toilet door in the OPEN position and one Photograph showing the toilet door in a CLOSED positions- who willingly accepted them as greater evidence of  proof  of Property Ownership –  and would have rejected as groundless and Irrelevant -as did Alan H Smith assistant Land Registrar- the overwhelming irrefutable Documentary evidence produced including the Original Land Title Deeds CE74844 “Absolute” Conveyed, Recorded and Registered at Land Registry Durham by J Anthony Brown Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool on the 29^th 3.1984. 

Plus other Bona fide Documents including an “Official Copy” of the Register of Title CE74844 “Absolute” issued by Land Registry Durham on 10^th October 2008, showing the entries in the register of title on the 9^th October 2008 at 10.55.27.

Any normal person let alone a Head if Land Registry and an assistant Land Registrar would have to be Completely Brain Dead- Mentally Deranged to challenge the Veracity of those  Original Registered Land Title Documents CE74844 “Absolute” and accept as greater proof of Ownership Two (2)Coloured Photographs of an Outside Toilet Door !?

I have no deliberate intension of showing any disrespect to you as my Honourable Member of Parliament for Hartlepool but I would be insincere if I neglected to say, that I honestly believe that officials of Land Registry are deliberately showing NO respect to you as the Elected Member of Parliament for Hartlepool.

I believe they are  playing a game with you, as they did with me-  called “Pass the Parcel” or is it Pass the Buck- first Malcolm Dawson O.B.E. who’s answers to you, were not only nonsensical but blatantly untrue-  then you wrote to Ed Lester Head of Land Registry London, on my behalf- who obviously has no intension or wish to become involved in such and unsavory criminal affair that exposes employees of Land Registry as Corrupt -and has deliberately passed all responsibility to F V Clough –obviously to avoid any possible future repercussion that he the Head of Land Registry failed to take seriously or investigate the allegations of criminal misconduct in his Government Department - reported to him by the Iain Wright M.P. Honorable Member of Parliament- for Hartlepool  on behalf of a Constituent.

You cannot have failed to notice that F V Clough- who you said-was the most senior lawyer of Land Registry Durham, in his letter to you- also failed to address any of the allegations of Criminal misconduct you sent on my behalf to Ed Lester - Head of Land Registry London- on the Grounds that my criminal allegations had been fully investigate by Elezabeth Derrington

That is NOT repeat NOT entirely TRUE- my dealings with the Senior Complaints Reviewer Elizabeth Derrington were friendly and very courteous but I was totally dismayed and disappointed although she found in my favour and awarded me £300 and an apology for mistakes made by Officials of Land Registry Durham, she claimed “Correctly” that deciding the ownership of Registered Freehold Land and property was NOT in her Remit and closed  her Investigation rather quickly.

I draw your attention to  this bearing in mind that my Serious allegation of Criminality are directed and involve a number of Senior Land Registry Officials who I understand to be- if not Working Colleagues of F V Clough, are most certainly employed in the same building- Land Registry Durham.

To his credit, F V Clough did apologise and regretted passed mistakes  as had Elizabeth Derrington- Complaints Reviewer – he also raised the question of the £300 I had previously been awarded and returned to Land Registry London, it’s return was also offered to me, whether I accept this offer is still debatable-

Am I to understand that if I accept this Offer of £300- previously rejected – that  it will in no Way Prevent of Restrict any Future Litigation of any Description- I may contemplate- does it also indicate that F V Clough intends to fully investigate my Allegations of Criminality previously denied to me- and will he give an explanation WHY a Senior Employee in a position of Trust in Public Office Alan H Smith assistant Land Registrar- would accept as Greater  Proof of Registered Land and Property- Two (2) Coloured Photographs of an Outside Toilet Door and REJECT as Irrelevant the Original Land Title Deeds CE74844 “Absolute” Conveyed, Recorded and Registered at Land Registry Durham by J Anthony Brown Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool on the 29^th 3.1984

Am I correct into thinking that the illegal removal of Registered Property details from Land Title CE74844 “Absolute”   on the evidence of Two (2) Coloured Photographs of an Outside Toilet Door are to be reinstated correctly onto Land Title CE74844 “Absolute” and if not WHY not ?

It is important to remember if one is to understand and Gain an overall picture of this well-Orchestrated Criminal Deception  and Criminal Conspiracy -is to remember that the B141 applicant who submitted a request to Alan H Smith assistant Land Registrar Durham in October 2008 to ALTER the Registered and Recorded details in the Land register CE74844 “Absolute” when latter challenged to provide evidence to substantiate their claim- –submitted (2) Coloured Two Photographs of an Outside Toilet Door-( believed supplied by Anthony Lowes another Land Registry Official, ) as Irrefutable proof of their Registered Property  Ownership- are the very  same Planning applicants- who had previously submitted in August 2008 please note this date August 2008 (Two months before the above B141 was submitted in October 2008, to Land Registry) false claims of Registered Property Ownership to Hartlepool Borough Council in a Blatant attempt to obtain by Criminal  Deception- with is should be noted-  the willing assistance of Richard Trow - Hartlepool Planning Officer –a certificate of lawfulness from Hartlepool Borough Council for that part of their erected Kitchen Extension previously built on Registered Freehold Land and Property "CE74844 “Absolute” Which was NOT repeat NOT in the Planning Applicants Registered Land Title.

(Their B141 application to Land Registry - in October 2008 confirms they KNEW in August 2008 they did NOT own the Land and Property they had Previously Built part of their Kitchen Extension onto without seeking Planning permission or the property owners approval.

Not wishing to appear rude or disrespectful - I would like to ask you Iain Wright my Democratically Elected Labour Member of Parliament for Hartlepool what part if any of the above Scenario I have described do- you find difficult to understand- it is evident to any right thinking individual that I have exposed a Criminal Conspiracy involving Officials of both Land Registry Durham and Council Officials of Hartlepool Borough Council.

What if anything do you intend to do about it – if the answer is Nothing- then I am left with no alternative but to report my findings of FRAUD  to a Higher Authority

 

Yours Sincerely

Alan Harvey Flounders

Copies also sent to all three De-Brus Ward Councillors –Cook – Griffin- Stephen Thomas.