Sunday, 24 July 2011

Be Prepared to Stand Up and Fight for Your Right to Own Your Home

Instances of Land and Property Fraud are Increasing.
Friday 22nd July.
While surfing the Internet to-day, I read that  Stephen Parry, commercial director at Landlord Assist, stated that landlords should have a correspondence address held by the Land Registry to ensure they are notified if anyone tries to interfere with their title to the property.

 “I say any law abiding citizen would agree.”

He further  says: “In addition,  Property owners should  include in their title a restriction requiring the Land Registry “NOT”  to register any change to the title, including change of ownership or mortgage, without their consent.”

“Sound Common Sense.”

I personally find his words of wisdom very refreshing in deed. So much so, that having at this very moment in time, after nearly three (3) years  of swimming up a river of treacle , in  my attempt to have a Government Authority Land Registry,  commence an  Internal Investigation into my Serious Allegations of Land and Property Fraud, by Officers of Land Registry, Durham. With very little success,  they  did apologise and award me £300,  for some mistakes, which I returned, (more on this later )

I have  decided to seek the assistance and support  of my Democratically Elected Member of Parliament, for Hartlepool,  in my attempt to exposed to Public View those officers who have committed dishonest and unlawful acts in Public Office. (I leave readers to form their own opinions of Motive )
By posting on this Blog a weekly update of my Three (3) years struggle with Land Registry and Hartlepool Borough Council , who’s Internet Complaints Procedure is  Unworkable and a Complete and Utter waste of Time.

Friday 22nd July 2001.
Letter  to Mr Iain Wright, Member of Parliament, Hartlepool.

Dear Mr. I. Wright, M.P. for Hartlepool.

It is with some hesitation that I write directly to you, as my Member of Parliament for Hartlepool,  but as you were  Parliamentary Under-Secretary, Department for Communities and Local Government (28 Jun 2007 to 10 Jun 2009) in the last Government , I honestly feel  you will be keen to be made aware of my Allegations of wrongdoing both by Land Registry and some officers of Hartlepool Borough Council.

Land Registry have shown a total Indifference to Commence any Investigation into my  Allegations of Property Fraud, by officers
of Land Registry, Durham.

in a  B.B.C.  T.V. News  Programme “ Land Register too Open  to Fraud”  Broadcast  to the General public on Monday, 30th March 2009
Julie Jenkins,  who claimed to be Head of Fraud , stated:-

"We need to ensure there's a balance between Protecting the Individual
 and Protecting the Property and that's what we're “HERE”  to do ,

“ Protect People's Assets - One of the Most Important Assets they've got."

Land Registry  told the B.B.C. they  had an “Aggressive Anti-Fraud Policy”
and reported that Land Registry has paid “ Out £36 million pounds”  in compensation for “ Fraud “ since 2005, and suggested that
“ANY” Allegations of Land or Property Fraud should be Reported to “Julie Jenkins” Head of Fraud at Land Registry ?.
Which I have repeatedly done, all to no avail, Land Registry no longer wish to correspond with me ---I wonder why ?

Sondh Gurmale  Freedom of Information Officer for Land Registry,
on June 30th 2010, in reply to my request regarding the above , informed me that Land Registry do “NOT” have a Dedicated Department to Investigate
“ ALL “ alleged Land Property Frauds, therefore how can “” Julie Jenkins “
be HEAD of a Fraud department that does “NOT”  exist.

The B.B.C. have confirmed that a search by B.B.C. Engineers following my  additional F.O.I. request , had  Confirmed my inquiry and that the interview with Julie Jenkins  had been Broadcasted  to the General Public on 30th March 2009 and  was in fact recorded. ?

The Responsibility for Broadcasting  such Misleading and  Completely Untrue  Statements by Land Registry and  Julie Jenkins to the General Public  must  rest with Land Registry and not the B.B.C.

There is Definitely something Suspiciously Unsavoury if not Downright
Criminal and Dishonest about Land Registry’s Continued “SILENCE”
and Obvious Reluctance  to Investigate  “MY”  very Serious Allegations of Land and Property Fraud Committed by Employees of Land Registry.

 It would not be right or proper for you as the Democratically Elected   Member of Parliament for Hartlepool , not to be made fully aware of  MY  Serious  Allegations,  and I feel sure that you will agree with me that “ALL”  Despicable Dishonest Activities are clearly not in the “Public Interest” and should be fully Investigated by the Proper Authorities. and any Dishonest and Criminal activities should be Exposed in the Public Domain and  those responsible held accountable for their actions.
 (a)
May I ask you Mr. Wright as my Member of  Parliament for Hartlepool,  to Inquire of Land Registry “WHY” my Serious Allegations .of  wrong doing, incompetence, negligent misrepresentation, and misfeasance in public office, by Andrew Schofield, Office Manager, Richard Fernley , Land Register, Alan Smith , and Tony Lowes all employed at Land Registry, Durham. Have not been Investigated, or Reported for a Police Investigation. or Alternatively brought to the Attention of the Parliamentary Ombudsman.


In addition can you  Re-Assure and Confirm to  the General Public and in Particular all Hartlepool Citizens who “Purchased Council Houses” ,(myself included)) that all Ownership  Details , of Property, Conveyed, Registered and Recorded with  Land Registry, is as  Land Registry Publicly Claim, in their Land Registration Act 2002, Public Guide  8, August 2009,  that a “Registered Land  Title” is     “GUARANTEED”,
(c )
Or is this another Misleading and Completely Untrue Legal Statement  as was the Julie  Jenkins “Aggressive Anti-Fraud Policy” Broadcast on B.B.C. T.V. Broadcasted  to the General Public on 30th March 2009.
(d )
Does it allow Land Registry Authorities to Override the  Legal Conveyance of Property ( from seller to buyer )  as they do now ? if they don’t like the details  recorded.  They appear to be above the law.

“Somebody needs to go into the Land Registry , and find out what actually is going on there. It is clear that Land Registry at present is unfit for purpose.”

A full history of my Complaints and  FOI requests and all Correspondence, to   Land Registry Durham  and Hartlepool Borough Council relating to these Serious Fraudulent matters, which are combined, are available on the Internet at these addresses.

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/alan flounders
http://alanflounders.blogspot.com/  To ensure that a Full Record of this Correspondence is available in future I Intend to include it on my Blog.

More to follow, I intend to post my History of my Objection to a B141 Application next.

No comments:

Post a Comment