An
explanation-WHY –I continue my
Campaign- and WHY I have reported my
Concerns to Cleveland Police-
PLEASE SHARE -
remember just liking the post doesn't help spread it.
I don’t get a great deal
of pleasure from exposing the Corruption in Hartlepool-but I believe it is
necessary and in the public interest-
when you discover some Councillors and Council officials not all I agree- are morally unfit to hold positions of authority
in public office- they all get very well paid by the public to do a job- unfortunately-a few- start to believe
their own publicity- they think they can do and say what they like- they even
begin to think they are better than the average local- they also think they are above the law- they become big headed-
supercilious –and arrogant- these scoundrels should be exposed- unfortunately
some -Local authorities particularly Hartlepool-will
in my opinion- always try and pass the buck but I think you will find that it
is not possible when push comes to shove-particularly when you possess-as we do- the legal documents of Title- CE74844 “Absolute” including the receipt for the purchase-of-the
ex-council house-freehold-property- pursuant to the Housing Act 1980! The best class of title to have is
absolute.
This means
that the proprietor’s right to the land is absolute and cannot be Challenged?-
I believe Peter Devlin Chief Solicitor of
Hartlepool Borough Council- should know the law-we are led to believe -he is -after
all a Solicitor- particularly the
Law regarding Purchase of Land & Property-sold by Hartlepool Borough Council-and bought by local citizens-consequently his silence- indicates-he is NOT
taking my allegations of Perverting the
Course of Justice & financial
fraud-including abuse of Public Office-- by some of his Council
Colleagues regarding our legal ownership of the registered freehold land and
property-Title CE74844 “Absolute”- Seriously Enough - part of which was unlawfully
given to our immediate next door neighbour-In my view- this Conduct in failing
to pursue serious criminal offences reported to him-and I believe-Misconduct in a Public Office-Particularly his clear breach of the Fraud
Act 2006- Chapter 35-section 4-fraud by abuse of position-in which he is expected to Safeguard-or NOT act against-the financial interests of another person ? a breach of his
standards professional behaviour in the areas of Honesty and Integrity-
Does he need to be
reminded once again-that Hartlepool Borough Council- were the original sellers
and mortgage holders-of the land and property that we originally purchased in
all good faith from Hartlepool Borough Council in February 1984-Pursuant to the Housing
Act 1980-in Consideration of Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds £5,759.00-the
RECEIPT
on
the Land Registry-Official Copy- of the Document of Purchase.-is hereby acknowledged-by HARTLEPOOL
BOROUGH COUNCIL-of the CIVIC
CENTRE-HARTLEPOOL-
It was my understanding-
has explained by our Solicitors-Levinson-Walker
& Lister-that a Title Deed is a Legal Document by which Real Property
is Owned, Sold and transferred-once the Land and Property is
Purchased-Conveyed- transferred -recorded and registered by the Solicitor as
was ours-by J Anthony Brown- Chief
Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council on the 29th /3/1984.with Land Registry- Durham- the Property Deed is Proof that
the person named in it- owns the land described-edged in RED
on the Deed Title Plan- and all of
the buildings attached to it! It was also my belief
these entitlements are legally enforceable
This unfortunately
does’nt appear to be the opinion of the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough
Council-Peter Devlin- nor the
Opinion of the LABOUR Member of Parliament – for Hartlepool- Iain Wright M.P. who was informed of
the facts BUT remains
SILENT-
My continued research of
the some Legal site on the Internet- has expose some interesting data-that I
believe supports my allegation- that Alan H Smith-assistant Land
Registrar-and Anthony- Lowes-both Officials -of Land Registry Durham- Colluded and Conspired -with Officials of Hartlepool Borough Council- namely--Alyson Carman-Solicitor and Complaints
reviewer; Hilary Martin- Solicitor
and Freedom of Information Officer- Richard Trow Project Planning Officer-Mr-Reece- Planning Development Manager-Paul Burgon-Enforcement Officer- to Pervert the Course of Justice-in Public Office- Particularly their clear breach of the Fraud
Act 2006- Chapter 35-section 4-fraud by abuse of position-in which they-are-
expected to Safeguard-or NOT act against-the financial interests of another
person?
Here is Information
readily available in the Public Domain-
Land
Registry Proprietorship Register
The Land Registry’s
register of land is made up of three sections, or registers, called the
Property Register, Proprietorship Register and Charges Register. These three
registers contain information as to the ownership of a particular piece of
land, its extent, and any third party interests which affect it, such as
mortgages, rights or covenants.
The proprietorship register tells us the legal owner(s) of the land and
various other important pieces of information.
Proprietorship Register &
Class of Title
1.
Firstly, the proprietorship register tells us the “class of title” which the land is
registered with. There are six classes of title, three relating to freehold
land and three to leasehold land. The
freehold classes are absolute, qualified or possessory and the leasehold
classes are absolute, good leasehold and qualified.
2. The best class of title to have is absolute. This means that the proprietor’s right to the land is absolute and
cannot be challenged.
3.
Possessory title is at the
other end of the scale. This usually happens where the person who originally
applied to register the land could not prove his ownership, either because he
had lost the title deeds or he was claiming ownership through adverse
possession (often termed “squatters’ rights”).
4.
Possessory title can
be challenged by someone with a better claim to the land.
5.
Next we have the name(s) of the Registered Proprietor(s). These are the legal owners of the land and except in exceptional circumstances
(such as if a sole owner is bankrupt,
the property has been repossessed or
all owners are deceased) these are the people with power to transfer
the property to a new owner.
There can be a maximum
of four registered proprietors and a minimum of one. The date in brackets is
the date on which the property was registered in the name of the current
owners.
This will generally be
several weeks after the date on which they actually
completed their purchase.the Proprietorship
Register may state the price paid by the current proprietors when they
acquired the property. Any personal
covenants; they are covenants which are only binding on the current proprietor,
will be detailed here. The most common personal covenant found here is an
indemnity covenant.The Proprietorship
Register goes on to list any restrictions (entries which limit the way in
which the proprietors can deal with the title) and bankruptcy notices.
If anything I have
Written or Published is NOT TRUE why have NONE repeat NONE of the named
Hartlepool Council Individuals Disputed any of my allegations-NOR Commenced ANY Legal Proceeding against ME
for Slander-or whatever other crimes
they can think of-?
If anyone named wishes to refute
any of the allegations made against them-in a Court of law-they are of course-free
to do so- indeed-I would welcome such action- I am led to believe from my
internet research- a Council cannot
sue for libel-(Derbyshire vs Sunday Times-House of Lords 1993) nor can it indemnify a Councillor
or Council Officer who wished to sue an individual-(local authorities indemnity for members and officers)
order 2004!
If that is correct-they
should be reminded-before deciding
on such a Hazardous-Course of action-they
will have to pay their own legal costs-and prove-in a Court of law-our Documents
of purchase & Registration-to be fraudulent-?
10 years for Perjury- I think is the going rate at the moment!
Yours Sincerely
Alan Harvey Flounders
Tuesday, 14 June 2016
