UPDATE of my
statement posted- on F/B/on Tuesday 25th August 2015-and copied to
Iain Wright.M.P.
Dear Chief Solicitor-PETER DEVLIN-in line with your letter of Censure to me - regarding contacting my elected- De Brus-
Labour- Ward Councillors- in essence saying that any further Critical Comments
-I wish to make to them- Should be submitted to YOU
and NOT to my Elected Labour Ward
Councillors – this is -I believe -an Un -Democratic-Unhealthy
Situation-nevertheless- will you please forward to the De-Brus Labour Ward
Councillors-particularly- ROB COOK- the following –up dated statement-on Hartlepool Council Corruption- I maintain-that -Hartlepool Borough Council-it is
absolutely riddled with corruption.
to “Grant” the Retrospective Planning
Application H/2009/0568 a Certificate of
Lawfulness- All Knowing- that this particular-Retrospective planning
application- H/2009/0568-was“Unlawful”and
“legally flawed”-
it Contained- false claims to “Ownership” of part-of the
Freehold Land and Property, Registered Title CE74844
“Absolute”- on which the Retrospective applicant -had already illegally
built and attached-a kitchen extension onto.
“Ownership
Certificates” are a statutory requirement of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990– sections 65(5) /65(6)-attempting to gain
Pecuniary advantage by deception- is also fraud under the Fraud act 2006. fraud by
(a) abuse of position-in
Public Office- in which he is expected to safeguard –or not to act-against-the
financial interests of another person-
(b) intends, by means of abuse of that
position-to cause a loss to another or expose another to a risk of loss!(c)
obtaining property by deception—created by s15(1)of
the Theft Act 1968
Our Claim of Freehold Property Rights -the principles are as follows;-
1.
The claim of right must be one that involves a belief as to the right of the property in the hands of another.
2.
The claim must be genuinely -that is honestly held- the belief must be one of legal entitlement- to the property and not simply a moral entitlement-
3.
A claim of right -is a genuine belief held by a person that they have a bona fide claim of right to certain property-we have the Original -Land Title Deeds -CE74844 "Absolute" Conveyed-(the legal process involved in "Buying" and "Selling" property-on behalf of the "Sellers" of the Property- Hartlepool Borough Council-Transferred-Registered-Recorded in the Land Register-including both the "Property" and "Proprietorship Registers" at Land Registry-Durham- on 29/3/1984- by J Anthony Brown-the Chief Solicitor- on behalf of the "Sellers" of the Property-Hartlepool Borough Council-
Definition of Registered -Title Absolute-to a Property-that is free of any encumbrances or deficiencies- Absolute Title - Gives unequivocal right of "Ownership" to the Registered Owner-and- Cannot be Disputed or Challenged-by Anyone Else-this is opposed to Titles with Liens-attachments or judgments against them -Title "Absolute" is also known as a "Perfect Title".
We believe we have Sufficient Legal Documentary Evidence of Purchase and Registered Ownership -to make a Formal Complaint to Cleveland Police and commence legal challenges of Fraud and attempting to pervert the Course of Justice 
Our Claim of Freehold Property Rights -the principles are as follows;-
1.
The claim of right must be one that involves a belief as to the right of the property in the hands of another.
2.
The claim must be genuinely -that is honestly held- the belief must be one of legal entitlement- to the property and not simply a moral entitlement-
3.
A claim of right -is a genuine belief held by a person that they have a bona fide claim of right to certain property-we have the Original -Land Title Deeds -CE74844 "Absolute" Conveyed-(the legal process involved in "Buying" and "Selling" property-on behalf of the "Sellers" of the Property- Hartlepool Borough Council-Transferred-Registered-Recorded in the Land Register-including both the "Property" and "Proprietorship Registers" at Land Registry-Durham- on 29/3/1984- by J Anthony Brown-the Chief Solicitor- on behalf of the "Sellers" of the Property-Hartlepool Borough Council-
Definition of Registered -Title Absolute-to a Property-that is free of any encumbrances or deficiencies- Absolute Title - Gives unequivocal right of "Ownership" to the Registered Owner-and- Cannot be Disputed or Challenged-by Anyone Else-this is opposed to Titles with Liens-attachments or judgments against them -Title "Absolute" is also known as a "Perfect Title".
Anyone can clearly see -in the photographs
–above--the Carbuncle of a kitchen extension originally built Without Planning
Permission-attached too- and overlooking our Private Property- causing Structural Damage to that property-including–Blocking
Off –the internal Toxic Gas Ventilation Ducts-positioned high in the
rear wall of the outbuildings-by the original builder of the property- to ensure the safe
uninterrupted flow to the outside atmosphere
of any Toxic
or Explosive
Gas – from the Internal Hot Water Gas
Boilers-a life
threatening situation !
The Project Planning Officer- Richard Trow- on his inspection- of our property- found it funny- quite amusing in fact—particularly the 4 inch brass screws- protruding through the internal rear wall from our neighbours- kitchen Extention- which NOW forms a structural internal part of the neighbours kitchen extension- proving- if any further proof- was needed- that the kitchen extension built and attached to our Property- was NOT repeat-was NOT- ever- in their “Ownership” –
the True Facts of “Ownership” should have been known to Hartlepool Council- has they were the Original Lawful “Sellers” of the Ex-Council House Freehold Property-CE74844 “Absolute” –Conveyed- Transferred –Recorded and Registered with Land Registry-Durham- by the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Council- J.Anthony Brown – on the 29/3/1984.
The Project Planning Officer- Richard Trow- on his inspection- of our property- found it funny- quite amusing in fact—particularly the 4 inch brass screws- protruding through the internal rear wall from our neighbours- kitchen Extention- which NOW forms a structural internal part of the neighbours kitchen extension- proving- if any further proof- was needed- that the kitchen extension built and attached to our Property- was NOT repeat-was NOT- ever- in their “Ownership” –
the True Facts of “Ownership” should have been known to Hartlepool Council- has they were the Original Lawful “Sellers” of the Ex-Council House Freehold Property-CE74844 “Absolute” –Conveyed- Transferred –Recorded and Registered with Land Registry-Durham- by the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Council- J.Anthony Brown – on the 29/3/1984.
A Dangerous life threatening
situation-was also discovered by ROB COOK after his visit to our home when canvassing for
votes PRIOR to His Successful Election as
the Labour Councillor for-the -DE-BRUS Ward in West-View –HIS-Spectacular Theatrical Performance- was
outstanding-it had to be seen -for it to be fully appreciated-HIS-hand gestures-HIS-
speech was of dramatic quality-intense-moving-and inspiring- worthy -in
my humble opinion- of some theatrical reward- such as-being nominated for an OSCAR-such was the power of his delivery- “Who authorised that Horrible Carbuncle of a Kitchen
Extension” it should be “Demolished”- “a
Blot on the Landscape-”needless to say- both my wife and I –were
delighted with his response- and immediately went and Voted for Him
Unfortunately-since his victorious election as a Labour Councillor- in the
De-Brus Ward- he has suffered a Severe Loss of Memory (
Known as Political Amnesia ) and his non action- has revealed- to us- that ROB COOK is
a man of NO ethical principles-a Lying Scoundrel- an Hyporcrit -an all-round-first class- Snake Oil Salesman- a First Class Gobshite
- a person most unworthy of being a
Labour Party Councillor in Hartlepool- nevertheless, it established in
the Memory of two (2) Previous Staunch
Labour Party Supporters- an
outrageous-but- unforgettable scene- of what depths a Genuine
Incompetent would be Labour
Politician & Compulsive Liar- would go to get votes!
I fully understand-the right to
Freedom of speech- has never included the freedom to make an untrue insinuation
regarding another person- to the detriment of their reputation.-If any of these
named- Hartlepool Council Officials- Richard Trow Case
Planning Officer and Mr Reece Development
Control Manager- Hilary Martin-Freedom of
Information Officer- Alyson Carman Solicitor
and Complaints reviewer- -and Paul Burgon-
Enforcement Officer- De-Brus Labour-
Ward Councillor ROB COOK- can Challenge or
Disprove ANY statement made on this blog- http://alanflounders.blogspot.co.uk
- then I would welcome them- to commence -legal action
against me immediately-I will then be given the opportunity in open court- to
expose- their corrupt fraudulent criminality-fire away bonny lad, fire away.
The sooner the better- I have resolved to prove them guilty of wrong-doing in
public office- I am completely innocent of any dishonesty- I did nothing wrong-
but legally purchase- in all good faith – my ex council home from Hartlepool
Council- in February 1984- and have irrefutable documentary evidence- as Proof
of Purchase and Registered-Title-by the Chief Solicitor J Anthony Brown-on
behalf of the “SELLERS” of the ex-Council
House Freehold estate- Hartlepool Borough Council in February
1984-
My investigations of the Hartlepool
Planning System has unearthed a very unhealthy and disturbing side of the
present planning system- planning officers-can and are- bribed –there is no
other way to describe their dishonest actions- they are allowed- even
encouraged- by a Corrupt Labour Led Council –here in Hartlepool-for Planning
Officers-in this case-Richard Trow-to sit in judgement on their OWN
Planning projects-designed by themselves- to
ensure–for a consideration of course- the planning or retrospective
planning application will be granted a
certificate of lawfulness EVEN if the
application is known to contain fraudulent “Ownership Certificates” as
required by the- Town and Country Planning Act 1990– sections 65(5) /65(6)- and therefore legally
flawed-
Hartlepool Council as Employers
have been responsible for the fraudulent misrepresentations of their employees
since the mid-nineteenth century, under the decision of Barwick v English Joint
Stock Bank.[76] This liability was extended in the early 20th century, to cover
fraudulent actions which were not of benefit to the employer, a previous
requirement.[77] I honestly-believe-
Hartlepool Council- can be held
vicariously liable for their employees in Public Office- the test for vicarious
liability of fraud was whether it was within an employee's
authority – either actual, or outwardly appearing –that Richard Trow-Planning Officer- and other Council
Officials- to carry out the fraudulent actions that he did.[78]
Yours Sincerely -
Alan Harvey Flounders
Copies:- Iain Wright- M.P. for
Hartlepool
I have been advised- rightly or
wrongly- that Sending communication with the words “without prejudice” means
that the communication and its contents cannot be used against the party making
the statement in Court Proceedings. This protection is NOT restricted to
communication between lawyers or between lawyers and their clients. Any party
involved in a dispute that might result in litigation can communicate on a
without prejudice basis.-having included that- I again repeat – that if ANY of
the named Hartlepool Council or Land Registry Officials- wish to deny any of my
allegations-which I refuse to withdraw- on the grounds that they are factual-and
true-please- I repeat-please- challenge any of my statements- preferably in a court of
law-
