A copy of a letter with a few allterations,and a few Omissions, in updating my allegations of Criminal Misconduct at Land Registry Durham , I sent to my Member of Parliament for Hartlepool Iain Wright M.P. on Sunday 27th April 2014.
Dear Sir,
Following a message I recently received from another Victim of Injustice by Officials of Land Registry I Revisited and Reviewed my archived Documents regarding my previous allegations of Criminal Misconduct commited by employees of Land Registry Durham which have revealed a number of Serious Issues still to be Resolved.
Following a message I recently received from another Victim of Injustice by Officials of Land Registry I Revisited and Reviewed my archived Documents regarding my previous allegations of Criminal Misconduct commited by employees of Land Registry Durham which have revealed a number of Serious Issues still to be Resolved.
In my Continued research of the Wide World Internet, I believe I have Discovered sufficient Irrefutable Evidence of Criminal Wrongdoing that give Credence and support to ALL my Original allegations of blatant Criminal Conduct by Officials employed by Land Registry, Durham , in Particular thr Conduct of ALAN H SMITH the Assistant Land Registrar Who Despite Land Registrys own Remit , that Property Disputes can ONLY be Resolved by a Court of Lkaw and employees of Land Registry Cannot give any Legal Advice, was I believe deeply and Personally involved in attempting to Pervert the Course of Justice by HIS abuse of of Public Office in Land Registry Durham.
My IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE of Criminal Misconduct in PUBLIC OFFICE Centres around an OFFICIAL COPY of the Register of Title CE 74844 Absolute Issued by Land Registry Durham thenselves , on the 10th October 2008, and Shows the Entries in the Register of Title, on the 9th October 2008, at 10.55.27.
The PROPERTY Register , Describes the Registered Freehold Land and Estate Comptrised in the Title, the Boundaries can be seen Clearly on this OFFICIAL COPY of the Register of Title and are HIGHLIGHTED in RED
The PROPRIERSHIP Register, Specifies the CLASS of Title ABSOLUTE and VERY CLEARLY Identifies the OWNERS as
ALAN HARVEY FLOUNDERS and HIS Wife JAQUELINE ! Registered and Filed at Land Registry Durham on the
29th .3.1984 !
ALAN HARVEY FLOUNDERS and HIS Wife JAQUELINE ! Registered and Filed at Land Registry Durham on the
29th .3.1984 !
THIS LEGAL ACCEPTED GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COPY OF REGISTERED LAND TITLE CE74844 ABSOLUTE Is INDISPUTERABLE , AUTHENTIC , Bona fide , DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE OF FREEHOLD PROPERTY OWNERSHIP
Yet this legally accepted IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE of FREEHOLD PROPERTY OWNERSHIP Issued by LAND REGISTRY DURHAM Themselves was Completely Ignored and REJECTED as IRRELEVENT by ALAN H SMITH the Assistant Land Registrar, Durham also REJECTED as IRRELEVENT Were the ORIGINAL LAND TITLE DEEDS, CE 74844 ABSOLUTE ,
Registered aby J. ANTHONY BROWN , Chief Solicitor of HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL,
Registered aby J. ANTHONY BROWN , Chief Solicitor of HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL,
A Number of Important Facts not Opinions to Remember
ALAN H SMITH the Assistant Land Registrar, Durham, was quite Prepared to accept as Greater Proof of Property Ownership , TWO COLOURED PHOTOGRAPHS Of an OUTSIDE TOILET , ONE WITH THE TOILET DOORS IN THE OPEN POSITION and ONE WITH THE DOOR IN THE CLOSED POSITION. This Unbelievable Conduct of a Government Employee
IN A SENIOR POSITION OF ASSISTANT LAND REGISTRAR , MUST RAISE VERY SERIOUS CONCERNS IN THE MIND OF ANY NORMAL RIGHT THINKING PERSON, IT CLEARLY INDICATES TO ME , THE VICTIM OF THIS FRAUD , A POSIBLE UNSTABLE MENTAL ATTITUDE, OR A DELIBERATE ATTEMPT TO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE BY A PERSON IN PUBLIC OFFICE, IT CERTAINLY HIGHLIGHTS THEIR INCOMPETENCE , NOT TO MENTION THEIR IGNORANCE OF THE LAW, IN PARTICULAR THEIR COMBINED LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAND REGISTRATION ACT 2002, AND THEIR INABILITY TO UNDERSTAND THE ADVANTAGES OF REGISTRATION , OUTLINED IN THE DECEMBER 2005 EDITION OF THE LAND REGISTRATION ACT 2002, LATER UPDATED AND EXPLAINED IN GREAT DETAIL IN PUBLIC GUIDE No.8, Which claimes that a REGISTERED TITLE is GUARANTEED
IN A SENIOR POSITION OF ASSISTANT LAND REGISTRAR , MUST RAISE VERY SERIOUS CONCERNS IN THE MIND OF ANY NORMAL RIGHT THINKING PERSON, IT CLEARLY INDICATES TO ME , THE VICTIM OF THIS FRAUD , A POSIBLE UNSTABLE MENTAL ATTITUDE, OR A DELIBERATE ATTEMPT TO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE BY A PERSON IN PUBLIC OFFICE, IT CERTAINLY HIGHLIGHTS THEIR INCOMPETENCE , NOT TO MENTION THEIR IGNORANCE OF THE LAW, IN PARTICULAR THEIR COMBINED LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAND REGISTRATION ACT 2002, AND THEIR INABILITY TO UNDERSTAND THE ADVANTAGES OF REGISTRATION , OUTLINED IN THE DECEMBER 2005 EDITION OF THE LAND REGISTRATION ACT 2002, LATER UPDATED AND EXPLAINED IN GREAT DETAIL IN PUBLIC GUIDE No.8, Which claimes that a REGISTERED TITLE is GUARANTEED
This Government Guarantee of Registered Title , Must Now be View with Grave Suspicion by Millions of British Property Owners who with or without a MORTGAGE still believe a Government Promise to Guarantee and Protect the FINANCIAL INTERESTS of Property Owners by REGISTRATION is UTTERLY and TOTALLY DISCREDITED , if any Suspicious Criminal activities such as I have exposed and Described above, are Ignored and kicked into the Long Grass, are allowed to go Unpunished and Uncorrected.
The Following should be Rembered by all victims of FRAUD . It is still the LAW,
The Rt, Hon.LORD DENNING . The Lord Chief Justice . His appeal Court Ruling, January 12, 13, 24, 1956, was,
NO COURT IN THIS LAND WILL ALLOW A PERSON TO KEEP AN ADVANTAGE WHICH HE OBTAINED BY FRAUD .
NO JUDGEMENT OF A COURT , NO ORDER OF A MINISTER, CAN BE ALLOWED TO STAND IF IT HAS BEEN OBTAINED BY FRAUD, FRAUD UNRAVELS EVERYTHING.
The Rt, Hon.LORD DENNING . The Lord Chief Justice . His appeal Court Ruling, January 12, 13, 24, 1956, was,
NO COURT IN THIS LAND WILL ALLOW A PERSON TO KEEP AN ADVANTAGE WHICH HE OBTAINED BY FRAUD .
NO JUDGEMENT OF A COURT , NO ORDER OF A MINISTER, CAN BE ALLOWED TO STAND IF IT HAS BEEN OBTAINED BY FRAUD, FRAUD UNRAVELS EVERYTHING.
I Honestly believe that you as my M.P. should be kept informed of my endevours to try and Rectify an Injustice , Particularly as it was you , yourself , who Initially requested the Head of Land Registry RICHARD DAWSON O.B.E. to Investigate my very Serious Allegations of Criminality by Officials employed by Land Registry DURHAM.
It beggers belief that the Head of Land Registry RICHARD DAWSON O.B.E. failed to Discover ANY of the Irrefutable Evidence of Criminal Misconduct I had previously Exposed, I Personally find it Difficult if NOT Imposible to accept RICHARD DAWSONS claim made to you , that HE had found nothing to Support my Serious Allegations of Criminal Misconduct by Officials Employed in Land Registry DURHAM
It Would appear to suggest to any Normal Right Thinking Person , that the Head of Land Registry RICHARD DAWSON
O.B.E. Would Himself accept , as did His Employed Assistant Land Registrar ALAN H SMITH, the TWO COLOURED PHOTOGRAPHS of an OUTSIDE TOILET as Sufficient Evidence and therefore Greater Proof of PROPERTY OWNERSHIP and would REJECT as IRRELEVENT the ORIGINAL LAND TITLE DEEDS CE74844 ABSOLUTE Registered at Land Registry DURHAM on the 29th .3. 1984. By J. ANTHONY BROWN, Chief Solicitor of HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL.
O.B.E. Would Himself accept , as did His Employed Assistant Land Registrar ALAN H SMITH, the TWO COLOURED PHOTOGRAPHS of an OUTSIDE TOILET as Sufficient Evidence and therefore Greater Proof of PROPERTY OWNERSHIP and would REJECT as IRRELEVENT the ORIGINAL LAND TITLE DEEDS CE74844 ABSOLUTE Registered at Land Registry DURHAM on the 29th .3. 1984. By J. ANTHONY BROWN, Chief Solicitor of HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL.
Could this very strange, stick your head in the sand, I See No Evil, attitude, be another example of Officials in Government Office, being very CYNICAL , Knowing or Thinking they are untouchable and above the Law , and therefore NOT being Entirely HONEST in HIS Claim to you a Member of Parliament that the ORIGINAL Survey Documents had been DESTROYED , This answer , is I believe , Highly Suspicious if NOT a Blatant Lie, His Claim to You that there was a
Authentic Copy NOT You Wll Note an OFFICIAL COPY of the Survey, still available, Could I Request that you Obtain a Copy of that Document on my Behalf, as it will no doubt be needed in any future Court Procedings I may be Required
To instigate, as it could be classed as Evidence of Property Ownership which would be in Direct Conflict of our ORIGINALL Land Title Deeds CE74844 , Absolute , Registered on the 29.3.1984 at Land Registry DURHAM by the CHIEF SOLICITOR of HARTLEPOOL Borough Council, J. ANTHONY BROWN. Which Could Question the HONESTY and the PROFESSIONAL INTEGRITY of ALL the HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL OFFICIALS INVOLVED IN THE ORIGINAL SALE OF THE EX COUNCIL HOUSE FREEHOLD PROPERTY, INCLUDING LEVINSON , WALKER AND LISTER , SOLICITORS ENGAGED TO ACT OF OUR BEHALF.
Authentic Copy NOT You Wll Note an OFFICIAL COPY of the Survey, still available, Could I Request that you Obtain a Copy of that Document on my Behalf, as it will no doubt be needed in any future Court Procedings I may be Required
To instigate, as it could be classed as Evidence of Property Ownership which would be in Direct Conflict of our ORIGINALL Land Title Deeds CE74844 , Absolute , Registered on the 29.3.1984 at Land Registry DURHAM by the CHIEF SOLICITOR of HARTLEPOOL Borough Council, J. ANTHONY BROWN. Which Could Question the HONESTY and the PROFESSIONAL INTEGRITY of ALL the HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL OFFICIALS INVOLVED IN THE ORIGINAL SALE OF THE EX COUNCIL HOUSE FREEHOLD PROPERTY, INCLUDING LEVINSON , WALKER AND LISTER , SOLICITORS ENGAGED TO ACT OF OUR BEHALF.
It is my understanding obtained while researching various Legal Channels on the Wide World Internet, that a Bona fide Purchaser is ONE who Purchases Property for a Valuable Consideration that is Inducement for Entering into a CONTRACT and WITHOUT SUSPICION of Being DEFRAUDED or DECEIVED by the SELLER in this Case HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL , He or She has no notice of Any Defects of the TITLE.
A Bona fide Purchaser Pays in GOOD FAITH Full Value for the Property and Without ANY FRAUD Goes into POSSESSION
Bona fide adj.Latin for Good Faith it signifies HONESTY and the Real Thing and in the Case of a Party Claiming Title as a Bona fide Purchaser or Holder , it Indicates Innocence or Lack of Knowledge of ANY Fact that would Cast Doubt on the Right to Hold TITLE .
It is also useful to have an ABSOLUTE Title as When the Property is SOLD , you Can be SURE that the SELLER is Legally Entitled to SELL it.
Yours Sincerely
Alan Harvey Flounders
Alan Harvey Flounders
